 |
|  |
 |
|
MrWhereItsAt
|
 |
New Year's Resolution: 2005 is the year of Where It's At - come get some.
Nov 2001 time: 17:23
|
|
The Civ3 game is getting to the point where we have enough cities to worry about that occasionally we miss something. IF each citizen interested had one, two or even three bases to administer, disorders would be prevented, resources would be best used etc.... the only drawback I see is that the independence of Governors might clash with overall objectives. If these Governors just made suggestions to the DBP and DTC, and these two Directos had the final right of approval or disapproval, then we need not elect anyone new, just delegate to whoever was interested. The Governors would keep things as efficient as possible, following general guidelines given by the DBP and DTC (eg no military units, improve energy in your base etc.), and all important things like potential riots would be dealt with before they were missed, which is something the DBP can't keep up to date with fully all the time, even with the small number of basews we yet have.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darkness' Edge
|
|
I'd much rather see the job done completely.
T&C, I&E, and maybe BP could be merged into a larger ministry, and elected regional governors, covering regions of four cities each, would cover those tasks in their cities, reporting back to the Director, who would have power of veto.
This would be useful in giving newbies some experience and a chance to prove themselves - without taking out the responsibility and making the positions completely useless, or creating positions that we won't be able to fill.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pandemoniak
|
 |
of Xanadu, French Section of the Apolyton Must Crush Capitalism Party
Jul 2002 time: 06:23
|
|
quote:
Governors either have a point and a use or they don't.
|
Well, they can be given a use. But its up to the Directors to share their powers. Im sure you can understand a director cannot share his power with a non-existing governor.
quote:
I wish you'd stop pushing city governors - I think it's a moot point, because we simply don't have the people.
|
Well, thats according to the districts-making, thus according to the AT in my idea. If we have enough citizens to have one governor per base, I guess the AT will make districts like that. If we havent enough citizens, the AT will make other districts. Its all up to the AT intelligence, nothing to do with the number of bases and citizens, since its regulated by the AT (or whoever else, my first idea was to give tha AT this task, but it can be done by someone else, this is has to be discussed).
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|