 |
|
H Tower
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
They were there because your government asked for them, and Canada honoured its commitment under NATO.
|
NATO has nothing to do with this. Afghanistan is not within the specified area of concern for NATO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
Well one thing is for sure, not a single one of us, was at the site when this accident happen. So until we find out all the facts, repeat all the facts you should keep cool heads.
And for all of you non-veteran keep a lid on it. You have zero ideal what goes on in the military and yet a war zone flying at night and seeing tracer jumping all over the place.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
joseph1944: Two inquiries have concluded with the same result -- what are you talking about waiting for the facts?
It's impossible for us to be there, but both the Americans and Canadians have investigated and came to the same conclusion... | Did they release every thing to the public? If they did I would be real surprised. The Military never releases every thing to the public. Remember I was in and worked for the US Navy for 33 + years and they never admitted to anything with 100% of the trued.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Venom
Yeah! We legally bombed the Chinese! | What we told them was to keep their nose out of our business.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Seeker
I can't believe people are actually rallying around these jerks!
They should get nailed right to the wall, I don't care if they were totally green and panicked, they put on the unifrom, they gave up their rights.
right to the ****ing wall. |
The above is the reason why people are lining up to defend them. If it turns out to be the case that they screwed up, then yes, they should be punished appropriately. And frankly, friendly fire is something that happens in war, get over it. If the case is, as the pilots allege, they weren't properly briefed, then they shouldn't be punished at all.
I think y'all should wait to hear the evidence before convicting these men.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MOBIUS
|
 |
Prifysgol Caerdydd
Dec 1999 time: 15:23
|
|
quote: No, that's not what I said. I'm saying that My Lai was unquestioningly worse - this friendly fire incident was an accident, while My Lai was on purpose. It makes no sense to punish an accident greater than an intentional slaughter, wouldn't you agree? |
Sarcasm old boy… The point is that it is unfortunately impractical to bring up the past and punish the perps of My Lai, what we can do however is prosecute new cases to the fullest of our ability – if only to show the military of today that it cannot get away with the excesses (My Lai) of the past…
quote: And I'm sure I can dig up instances in history where British friendly fire killed American soldiers. |
I’m sure you can, but I have to say that the Germans killed an awful lot more US soldiers in WWII than the British did…
quote: Look, I'm not saying these guys should get off scot free - I'm simply saying that these guys are people too, and made a mistake. Kick them out of the military, give them a dishonorable discharge, even, but don't ruin their lives by locking them up for the rest of their lives. |
That they are – in which case there are far too many ‘people’ in the US military and not enough soldiers…
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat Mostly because our troops are the ones who actually fight. Of course, we know what you're really mad about. It ain't our fault if your guys can't properly call in a target, identify themselves, and then stay out of the target zone. |
Which is precisely why I don’t understand how you can kill so many British and Canadian troops – there are so few of us around!
The war of independence finished hundreds of years ago, OK! You won, so please stop killing us!
quote: Let's see what you do under fire. |
I don’t have to, I get some poor grunt to do it for me – preferably from another country. 
I am ‘cool under fire’ in an office situation…
quote: Well, if you'd agressively engaged the goddamned Iraqis, maybe they would have had more chances to shoot your troops asses off. Did you ever stop to think for a minute how maybe the reason the Iraqis were so generally ineffective at inflicting casualties was due in large measure to the overwhelming number of close support sorties that were effectively on target? |
Uh, riiiiight – so your logic is that because we’re not at the front fighting the Iraqis, we can’t be killed by them. OK, makes sense – so how come British troops got killed by the US, if they were obviously so far away from the fighting?
Yes, you’re right about the sorties that were so effectively on target – they did a good job annihilating a routed Iraqi army on Highway of Death. Bravo!
quote: At least ours fight. |
Well ours don’t get the chance because apparently as you would have us believe they’re killed behind the lines or on exercise – they would but they keep getting killed…
I notice you can’t even argue against the fact that they are too trigger happy.
I’d check the US casualty list in Afghanistan if I were you – at one point something approaching 50% of US casualties KIA or wounded were are a result of US fire…
Not to mention the Canadian friendly fire/hostile fire ratio.
You even almost killed Hamed Karzai before he came to power – imagine what a colossal f*ck up that would have been!
There was that artillery incident about a year ago in Saudi or Kuwait that plastered those poor hapless Kiwis, hell the US has even shot down at least one airliner – not to mention all the many ‘000’s of civilians in Afghanistan, Somalia, Panama, Iraq, Serbia…
Face it – the US army is hooked on blowing innocent people away, something needs to be changed to prevent this from happening as often as it does! 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rogan Josh
|
|
I think the two pilots should be disciplined, but I also think there should be some attempt to tackle the root problem. It looks very much like they were not adequately trained for the mission - they did not follow procedures and were not properly briefed.
I hope that some heads roll (metaphorically of course) in the command hierarchy too. To say that this was entirely the two pilots' fault in making them scapegoats I think.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:23
|
|
A lot of issues here.
The pilot was told to wait, but he didn't. He violated standing orders that were designed to prevent these accidents. Based on the information that has been released, he didn't have any need to break the orders.
However, according to a leak transcript of the radio transmission, he was cleared to bomb moments after he pulled the trigger.
So, if he hadn't been so trigger happy, he wouldn't be in so much sh!t.
There have been two investigations, but most of the facts have not been released. We don't know why the AWAC cleared the pilot to bomb. The AWAC should have been told about the training exercise.
The investigating officers said the pilots should have known about the training exercise, but it was never said whether the pilots did know about it.
This looks like the pilots are being set up as scapegoats.
However, the pilot dropped a bomb. The pilot is ultimately responsible for ensuring that he gets all the information that he requires before a flight. It may not be fair that he gets screwed because someone didn't tell him about the exercise, but that's the life of a pilot.
What bothers me is there is no indication that the American or Canadian military have tried to learn from this accident.
As for the Governor, he's being a complete idiot. Sure, he has to stay loyal to his men, but as the commander-in-chief of the Illinois National Guard he also has to show loyalty to the military investigators and uphold the legal system.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
- Groucho -
|
|
The thing I don't get is that both the pilot and the AWAC seem to have decided (if the leaked transcript is correct) on the basis of unidentified ground fire to just bomb something. How did they know those weren't American special forces down there? It was ground fire, not directed at the plane, so how could they not think that SOMEBODY on their side was likely down there fighting?
It just seems insane to drop a bomb on a firefight that doesn't threaten you when your own guys could be involved.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|