 |
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by connorkimbro
The amount of the defense budget really doesn't matter for ****. What percent the defense budget is of the overall GDP is what OUGHT to be compared.
And does anyone know what kind of results you get from that calculation? I'll give ya a hint, the US is nowhere NEAR the top. |
That's already been discussed. For the record, IMO, the amount of the defense budget is FAR MORE important than what it is as a percentage of GDP. The latter only measures how well a country can (presumably) afford the level of spending it has. In terms of calculating military strength in absolute or relative terms, it is totally meaningless.
Again, it comes down to how much do you ultimately need. Dan and CG argue that there are ulterior motives behind the US expenditure, others may not. It still doesn't change the fact that Saudi Arabia at 50% of GDP (even though it's really 14.5%) still couldn't hold a candle to the US at 1% (even though it's really 3-4%)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kontiki
FISCAL YEAR 2002 — BUDGET AUTHORITY
(Dollars in Billions)
Military Personnel $82.3
Operations and Maintenance $125.7
Procurement $61.6
Research and Development $47.4
Military Construction $5.9
Family Housing $4.1
Other $1.9
In other words, the US is spending approximately 57% on ops, maintenance and procurement. That's over $187 billion. |
One Submarine today cost 1 billion, 1 Aircraft Carrier cost between 2 and 3 billion, so if you just build one Carrier and Sub., you have just spent 4 billion of the 61.6 for the year.
It has been reported that during the Clinton years we did not buy any new Planes, Ships, Tanks etc. The items that were produces during these year was authorized in prior years before Clinton.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Lonestar
|
 |
AECCP Dark Lord of the Sith
Aug 2000 time: 00:23
|
|
Lonestar would like to point out that he is a member of an all-volunteer Navy, and as such the USN has to do a lot more to keep us worker bees happy.
For instance, I suspect our base salary, Health Care, dental, housing allowance, "BAS"(food), "immient danger pay", "Sea pay", "Relective re-enlistment bonus", Morale Welfare and Recreation is all wwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaayyyyyy higher than the case nations with conscription armies fork out.
Oh yeah. Forgot 100% payed College tuition.
And you wonder why the American defense budget is so large....
Which is not to say I wouldn't mind a pay raise.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:23
|
|
Well, they also get billions in military aid from the US. My understanding is that we give them something like 3 billion in aid every year that they must spend on military procurements from US contractors. Could be wrong, just something I heard somewhere.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
"When past and future wars are factored in, we spend more than half our government budget on war."
Don't know where you get that sound-bite, Che. Even if you only consider discretionary spending plus interest on the debt as the "government budget", you don't get there. This doesn't even consider Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, and other "mandatory" spending in the mix. |
Okay, you're right. Currently past, present, and future wars only account for 46% of the budget.
The War Resisters' League.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
heh heh
europe is fooled by our defence department
maybe they are fooled by UN peacekeepers also?
maybe we should rename the defense department, the peace department to help releive their confusion
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|