 |
|
tandeetaylor
|
|
Las Vegas
Apr 2001 time: 21:23
|
|
Fez has all of the imperfections of the human race without being able to lay claim to any of its genius.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tandeetaylor
|
|
Las Vegas
Apr 2001 time: 21:23
|
|
And I'm rubber you're glue?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tandeetaylor
|
|
Las Vegas
Apr 2001 time: 21:23
|
|
I figured it was some such thing. I was just messing...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tandeetaylor
|
|
Las Vegas
Apr 2001 time: 21:23
|
|
So let me ask you something Lincoln, since you have stated opposition to the premise of the United Nations, do you think we should make war against Iraq if it refuses to comply with the UN's wishes?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tandeetaylor
|
|
Las Vegas
Apr 2001 time: 21:23
|
|
And you still haven't answered my right or wrong demand....
EDIT: It's OK if you want to go back on something you said in order to align all your opinions with themselves. I won't hold it against you, as long as you'll admit it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
I am not eager for the UN to do anything because I think it IS and international debating club. I think their resolutions are a joke whether they be against Israel or whoever. And I am not eager for an invasion into Iraq or Israel. I would simply like to know what the answer is from those who do place some faith in the UN. Bush seems to have called their bluff which apparently is what their resolutions are.
In clear answer to Tandy's question I would say that the whole war against terrorism is a joke with or without the UN. I am not for invading anyone. In my opinion it is an unwinable war. We are hated because our women do not wear Burkas among other things. We can't fight fanatics who hate anything not Muslim.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
The solution is to start buying burkas from Iraq and to force our women to wear them and walk two (or is it three) steps behind their husbands. Then voila! End of international terrorism!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lawrence of Arabia
|
 |
of the Gulag Archipelago
Apr 2001 time: 06:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tassadar5000
Yes, and before Saddam releases his twenty nukes at us! But luckily, he'll be stepping down.....oh wait, thats CHINA.
So yeah your right, we shouldnt wait for Saddam to begin harbouring terrorists and letting them train in his country. And boy, does he have a high chance of nuking his...Oh wait a minute, thats PAKISTAN.
But....you do have a point. Some people in this world really hate the US. And this entire world is powered by money....and Iraq has a ton of it. I mean, they finance terrorists every day! Oh my, wait just a second....thats SAUDI ARABIA.
And didn't Iraq violate that No Nukes treaty? Oh wait.....that was (haha) NORTH KOREA.
And hey, who says you can trust former foes turned allies...Iraq already has a HUGE stockpile and I highly doubt they'll abide by the arms reducation treaty.....Oh yes, thats RUSSIA.
And heck, you definately can't trust Iraq....theyre defeated in WW1, and then again in WW2.......Oh my, that was GERMANY. My mistake.
And when people tell you size doesnt matter.....It really does. And Iraq is a HUGE country, second largest in the world.....Wait a minute, I'm talking about CANADA.
Iraq used to be our greatest ally....they helped us win our independance AND they even gave us a large statue thats one of the most recognizable symbols of America to date....Oh wait, thats FRANCE.
ALL THESE COUNTRIES COULD ATTACK THE US AT ANY TIME. Probably all these countries have access to checmical weapons. All these countries pose a threat to the United States and her interests.
Should we attack all these countries using the Bush Doctrine? Cause the only way to eliminate every single threat to the US would be to attack them...well, not ONLY them but the entire world in fact. Heck, I'll add another one for you Fez.....
Iraq is such a threat, theyre provoked by the littest things! Some worthless island that they really didnt even have control over was taken by someone, and...THEY WERE WILLING TO GO TO WAR! See, so how can we trust him to be stable..? Oh wait, thats SPAIN I'm talking about.
So yeah, one day Spain could launch a massive attack on, oh NYC using chemical and biological weapons....Or France could. Or maybe Russia will nuke us! Germany might invade Britain....We gotta attack them all pre-emptively.... |
This is greatest post ever in the history of Apolyton.

|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
My my, you have been busy! That must have taken a lot of work. I don't personally believe in killing anyone and I would not fight in a war (although I did in the past). I do believe however that the civil governemnt of a nation has the right and duty to protect its citizens and support right things and condemn that which is wrong. I debate these issues as a poster on Apolyton who has an idea of the historic perspective. I thought you were referring to the UN as being an entangling alliance by the way. In any case, I do agree that we should not have entangled ourselves with any nation. But now that we are hopelessely entangled in world affairs I do not think we should forsake Israel to pacify those who cannot be reasoned with regardless of what we do.
Again, I am a student of history so this is largely an abstract problem for me. I think we are going down the tubes as a nation and world. The enemy is not international terrorism. That is just the tip of the iceburg.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
quote: Originally posted by tandeetaylor
Are you trying to be funny? No offense, but it ain't working for ya... |
Yes, I noticed that you are a little dense.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
I thought you had a sense of humor... I admit that mine is a little dry but I thought you would catch on. I will try to be more obvious next time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
tandeetaylor
|
|
Las Vegas
Apr 2001 time: 21:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lincoln
I thought you were referring to the UN as being an entangling alliance by the way. In any case, I do agree that we should not have entangled ourselves with any nation. But now that we are hopelessely entangled in world affairs I do not think we should forsake Israel to pacify those who cannot be reasoned with regardless of what we do. |
I agree that the UN creates entangling alliances, but I don't know how you could have mistaken what I was talking about, as I specifically mentioned Israel, and was, in fact, repsonding to one of your posts about Israel.
And I don't give a **** about "pacifying" or "reasoning with" anyone. You're so desperate NOT to do those things that you let it cloud your judgement of what is right and what is wrong. I am interested in doing what is right, and incidentally, what is best for this country. Continuing to do what is wrong is NOT doing what is right, nor is it, by any stretch, what is best.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
tandeetaylor
|
|
Las Vegas
Apr 2001 time: 21:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lincoln
I thought you had a sense of humor... I admit that mine is a little dry but I thought you would catch on. I will try to be more obvious next time. |
I'm sorry, but me not laughing at your pathetic sense of humor does not make me dense.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lincoln
|
|
I think that some people cannot be reasoned with. I used to work in a prison. Maybe that clouded my judgment but there are some people I will not turn my back to. Fanatics by definition are beyond reason. We might as well face up to that. Imagine being on a rack during the inquisition and telling the priest that you really love God and your fellow man. *crank squeal...*
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|