 |
Please read the questions below.
This poll is closed. |
| 1: farm&condenser |
   |
8 |
61.54% |
| 1: farm&collector |
   |
1 |
7.69% |
| 1: forest |
   |
5 |
38.46% |
| 2: farm&condenser |
   |
3 |
23.08% |
| 2: farm&collector |
   |
7 |
53.85% |
| 2: forest |
   |
4 |
30.77% |
| 3: farm&condenser |
|
2 |
15.38% |
| 3: farm&collector |
|
4 |
30.77% |
| 3: farm&mine |
|
1 |
7.69% |
| 3: forest |
|
6 |
46.15% |
| 4: farm&condenser |
|
3 |
23.08% |
| 4: farm&collector |
|
6 |
46.15% |
| 4: farm&mine |
|
1 |
7.69% |
| 4: forest |
|
4 |
30.77% |
| 5: write-in |
|
1 |
7.69% |
| Total: |
13 voters |
100% |
|
| |
|
|
Maniac
|
 |
Gent, Belgium
Jul 1999
time: 06:23
|
|
It’s time to fulfill an electoral promise, so I present TBHGTPFTT, or more specifically The Big Huge General Terraformation Poll For Term Three. (seven days, multichoice  )
Let’s explain:
The Big Huge
This poll exists out of no less than four parts.
Part one, this one, about what to do with rainy terrain.
Part two, click here, about what to do with moisty tiles.
Part three, click here, about rocky terrain.
Part four, click here, about several matters such as arid & sea terrain, and fungus.
General Terraformation Poll
I would like to draw your attention to the word “general”. I know of course the answer on the question “What to terraform?” is “It depends.”, but that information isn’t quite useful for running this directorate in a democratic way. What I ask you is what terraformation you would most likely use on what terrain under normal circumstances. When you answer this question, I won’t need to poll every terraforming action of every former this term. I’ll only need to poll about special squares, about base locations and where to focus our terraforming powers. Also the bureaucracy involved with this directorate will be reduced to a workable level, and I won’t need to resign out of desperation as Pandemoniak did.
For Term Three
That’s right. I will use the results of this poll for the entire month. I’m sure you wouldn’t like to answer the same questions over and over every week.
Anyway, the questions of this part:
1) What terraformation should we perform on flat&rainy terrain below 1000 metres?
Farm&condenser
Farm&collector
Forest
2) What terraformation should we perform on flat&rainy terrain above 1000 metres?
Farm&condenser
Farm&collector
Forest
3) What terraformation should we perform on rolling&rainy terrain below 1000 metres?
Farm&condenser
Farm&collector
Farm&mine
Forest
4) What terraformation should we perform on rolling&rainy terrain above 1000 metres?
Farm&condenser
Farm&collector
Farm&mine
Forest
5) And of course…
Write-in
Just post any remarks in this thread.
Last edited by Maniac on 31-10-2002 at 00:30
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Kirov
|
|
Warsaw, Poland
Sep 2002
time: 06:23
|
|
What's the point of planting condenser on rainy terrain, esp when we don't know how moist are tiles surrounding it?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Kirov
|
|
Warsaw, Poland
Sep 2002
time: 06:23
|
|
TKG, agreed, but Drogue wrote about rolling, not rocky squares.
It's better to forest flat&rainy than rolling&rainy tile. You can also condense/farm the latter, and have additional one mineral.
IIRC, it's the presence of mine, not the actual rockiness, that decreases nuts by one.
I think that rolling&rainy tiles should almost never be forested, but rather farmed. On the other hand, flat&rainy should almost always be forested.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23.
Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
31-10-2002 00:05
. Good point, though, we should prioritize their placement according to which will most effectively improve the usefulness of adjoining squares.
|