 |
|
Keygen
|
|
Athens, Hellas
Jan 2000 time: 07:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Maestro
How can a moderator see if any of those cheats is used ? |
I think it can work with private or public accusations as long as the moderator keeps the past 20-30 turns or so otherwise he will have to study every single turn he receives and compare it with previous ones, a task that is practically inapplicable. Some cheats might be improssible to be tracked but then again we can do nothing about it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Keygen
|
|
Athens, Hellas
Jan 2000 time: 07:23
|
|
Any first opinion?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Keygen
|
|
Athens, Hellas
Jan 2000 time: 07:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Franses
Good work, Keygen. Will you adapt it for CIVIII at some point? 
|
For sure! If they have some sort of success here of cource.
quote: Originally posted by Franses
I do have some questions/remarks. These are:
|
Good 
quote: Originally posted by Franses
I prefer the Email notification instead of posting in the thread. Posting in the thread means that you have to go to Apolyton which takes more time than sending an e-mail. The same is true for the players. Deleting an e-mail takes less than 1 second. Going to a thread to check upon the status takes much more time (and I have cable, this is even more important for our friends with a dial-up connection)
|
I think many players would prefer that. If their time is quite limited and the connection slow or if the games are too many then they can simply send an email only. I do refer that within the rules anyway. However it can have its negative points like a) someone that might not receive the email or is having temporary email problems might not be able to figure out what is going on, b) people that prefer that method will most likely visit the forum less often, c) the threads will slowly fade away and d) people that play in many games will be forced to receive dozens of more emails in their mailbox.
For those that do prefer that method I propose something between. Send email but post in the threads as well periodically.
Personaly I always send an email notification and when I am not very busy I post in the threads as well.
quote: Originally posted by Franses
Regarding the 24 hour rule:
1. IMO people should be allowed to be away for a weekend or for a couple of days. Of course they should notify the moderator and ask permission from the other players.
2. How realistic is the 24 hour rule? IMO we should strictly adhere to it but I notice that many moderators (if not all) are not that strict. I do not do it either because I doubt whether strict adherence to this rule would be really appreciated. But if we define the rule as is, we really should all DO it. It will certainly take down game time needed. If not (as now), let us define another rule.
|
1. The player can have a couple of days if he notifies the moderator or if not any the rest of the players. It is in the rules. If you want my opinion if the game doesn't suffer from delays and is pretty fast then even more days can be given if done only a few times. Under such ideal conditions some rules can be a bit elastic once in a while. We are not robots or the gestapo here 
2. I beleive that it is very hard to enforce this rule but if we remove it or extend it in more days then things will get worse. I do agree with you but in busy days, we the moderators can't ensure 100% enforcement of this rule. Generally if a moderator persistently fails to do his job correctly he should be replaced. It has been done in the past and can be done in the future 
However we can all be as consistent as possible and I agree with that but the only person here that I've never seen failing in his typical community obligations is Paul so far.
quote: Originally posted by Franses
Players nexted:
I don't think the moderator should be asked to really play the turn. It may get rather time consuming, he may know the position of the opponent etc. Just open the game and hit end.
|
That is because you've never seen a game been changed hands and been nexted in between from the inner probably The last who will take over will have a damaged from neglect civ!
That was one of the fundamendal reasons for the first appearance of the whole moderator idea.
At list the moderator can do some basic moves and deliver it in a little better situation. Not to mention what can be saved in a critical situation which is not something completely rare.
I expect that moderators are as much objective as possible. He will work for the benefit of the civ but will not take advantage of his possible knowledge of an opponent. He doesn't have something to gain anyway.
quote: Originally posted by Franses
Reporting rated games:
IMO this should be done by the creator not the moderator. If things go well the moderator does not need to look at a game for many turns (did never happen to me, though ). That's good. Reporting the status would force him to keep track of the game even if things go well. Also the creator will be much more interested in the game status and therefore it is easy for him to make the ten turn report.
Frans |
I do refer in the rules that the reporting of the ratings can be done from a player, either the creator if he plays in the game (I have created lot of games that I do not play in ) or even better the player who has the higher PG and is rated. He will surely not lose any chance to report the ratings 
I personaly do not report the ratings in the games I moderate. They are quite many and don't have the time and will to calculate them and reporting them 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Keygen
|
|
Athens, Hellas
Jan 2000 time: 07:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by redbull
No problem Keygen, anytime It's great to see the all the effort you put into CtP PBEM show for something.
|
Thanks for that 
quote: Originally posted by redbull
Another note:
If a player has been found cheating, and the moderator has called a council, I believe this should happen:
If a majority is found, then that decision goes. If it is even, then a re-vote will happen, with the moderator voting.
EDIT: I think the votes should go to the mod via PM, rather than on the thread, to keep the suspect from knowing, or having a vendetta against the people who voted against him/her |
I think if there is a draw in the voting result then the moderator should decide. No need for re-vote. Good point though, thanks for bringing this up 
I guess the process of the voting will be decided from the players in the game when the time comes.
That is a detail, kind important though but a little extreme situation that someone will have a vendetta but who knows . It can be added as a comment in the next version. Thanks 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Keygen
|
|
Athens, Hellas
Jan 2000 time: 07:23
|
|
Any other commend?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|