04-11-2002 05:05									#1
	Conquering Cities Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

When playing multiplayer, whenver you conquer a city you do not get the option to raze it. Is this no longer possible, or is there a setting to change to allow razing? War is kind of useless far from home if you cannot raze cities.

	04-11-2002 21:47									#2
	Remove this text

Guess that's a no to pillaging a city?

	04-11-2002 22:03									#3
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

you can always right-click and abandon the city

	05-11-2002 05:32									#4
	Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

Its better to conquer a city and keep it a little while anyhow, it won't flip for a couple of turns even without many troops garrisoned.
You want to be able to see what buildings survived the takeover and its useful to have the expanded city boundary, so you can move troops out and in fast, even if its just a settler to put in place of that city.

I think ruins are a good idea, civ3 isn't a game based on graphics, if you had a game looking like quake 3 or 4 you wouldn't get the depth of gameplay.. designers only have a limited time due to economic money constraints.
The original terrain graphics do suck in general though, they should have done better with the forests and roads(though the wriggliness is nice)

	05-11-2002 06:01									#5
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I understand why its good to keep cities, I am just not happy I can pillage them if I choose to.

	05-11-2002 06:32									#6
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

just abandon the city, jeez

-Mellian

	05-11-2002 06:34									#7
	Increase the size of your Attachments

LOL, well ya but I want all them workers you get otherwise!

	05-11-2002 10:04									#8
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Umm if you raze a city I dont think you get the workers.