 |
|  |
 |
|
Tuberski
|
 |
ACK!!! PTHBBPPPTTT!!!!
Feb 2002 time: 23:23
|
|
This release of PtW has unleashed a torrent of debate over whether people have been screwed or not.
Either way, you knew what you were buying and you new the previous release history of Civ III.
If you are disappointed, serves you right, you should have had a pretty good idea what to expect.
If this game never gets patched properly, it will serve the "fanboys" right, for placing faith in something that may not be possible.
I am the third type, I learned after the initial release of Civ III and will await developments in the patch process. If the game gets better I may buy it, if it doesn't, I will not.
Just like a Firaxian told me once, you show your support by buying the game, whether you support them or not.
ACK!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Random Passerby
|
|
Even without previous history, the game had hardly hit the shelves before Firaxis came up and said "Give us a moment, we're working on it."
Personally, I don't care much one way or another if the netplay is functional or not functional or won't be functional for another few weeks. Buying a Civ game for netplay makes about as much sense to me as buying a toaster for washing the dishes with. Doing it and then complaining about it strikes me as being about the same either way, too. :P
|
|
|  |
 |
|
[FX]Roman
|
|
Uhh... Be more specific when you talk about the release of Civ3.
I bought it within like a week of it going gold, Civ3 that is, and it was fine. I was absurdly much more happy with it than I am with PTW.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ecthelionII
|
|
Western New York
Apr 2002 time: 00:23
|
|
I agree with you about people whining about the game. I could sit here and point out all of the little things that are buggy while playing CivIII and PTW, but I don't, because to me, the bottom line is that both games are very enjoyable and the bugs do not take away that much from the game.
If you don't like it, don't buy it. That's why reviews should be read before you spend money on something your not 100% sure about. I knew I wanted CivIII and PTW, so I bought them, and I have no regrets even if I have to patch it. That's the beauty of PC games.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:23
|
|
I always thought the place for complaints and problems was in the bug thread. Or in the Civ3 help forum.
Or in the alternative, have a thread with constructive criticism, ala discussion over the late game tedium. Which led to the group movement feature.
I don't understand the expectation that it will work perfectly out of the box. Maybe I've been unlucky in the past, but it seems like I've had to tweak my computers for NEARLY EVERY GAME I've ever purchased. I've had hardware problems, OS problems, RAM problems, Video Card problems, patch problems etc. etc. etc. but I played with the computer, read the readmes and the online helps, and I've gotten everything working. Now that I have a semi new 1.7ghz Dell, I don't have many software problems, but I still tweak by getting rid of the background programs.
For me, civ3 and PTW have worked fairly well. I have played several mp games to the end, but I admit that its not perfect. it has flaws, which are being addressed. If you can't get a feature to work, there are people here that can help you. And what isn't working is being patched, like it was when Civ3 was originally released.
I fail to see how calling Firaxis idiots or retards is constructive. Maybe I just expect a level of maturity that some can't display in an anonymous forum.
Thanks
|
|
|  |
 |
|
georges bonbon
|
|
To all the whiners:
GIVE ME A GOOD ALTERNATIVE GAME
I am always willing to learn.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
I'm confused by people who seem to confuse problems with the entire computer software and technology industry with Firaxian errors. Anyone who gets a copy of any software on the day of release is going to get burned in some way as I see it. Software industries unfortunately see the period after release as a major part of development.
I'm not defending Firaxis here, just a little suprised by all the people who are suprised.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DJ RRebel
|
|
CANADA
Jul 2000 time: 05:23
|
|
Hmmn ... I think some of you are overlooking a key point ...
When Civ 3 came out ... it made the claim it was the next generation of Civ ... and althought it could have been cleaned up a bit ... it still was playable ... in fact, I never installed any of the patches (didn't want to corrupt games in progress for the most part) .. and yes ... I got a bit frustrated at a few things, but in the end, the game was both playable and enjoyable ... and most importantly, lived up to it's claims ...
Now ... the problem with PTW ... is that on its cover ... it says MULTIPLAYER ... in big bold letters ... It does not say:
"MULTIPLAYER plus or minus 5% of the time if you're lucky under unexplained and unknown circumstances that we're working on and hope to have it fixed at some point in the future for some of you but we're not making any promises and do not recomend you holding your breath ... but we promise a new expantion pack with units with blue faces for those of you who do hold your breaths for too long"
lol ... the fact remains ... for me ... Civ3 was playable and enjoyable out of the box (even if it was far from perfect) ... and the key selling point for PTW (Multiplayer) ... is not even functional out of the box !!!
To me ... that is a BIG difference !!!
Anyhow ... let's just hope they get things fixed before a class action suit is started !!! lol
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Minuteman
|
 |
Brooklyn, NY
Jan 2002 time: 05:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DJ RRebel
lol ... the fact remains ... for me ... Civ3 was playable and enjoyable out of the box (even if it was far from perfect) ... and the key selling point for PTW (Multiplayer) ... is not even functional out of the box !!!
To me ... that is a BIG difference !!!
Anyhow ... let's just hope they get things fixed before a class action suit is started !!! lol |
Actually, I disagree with you on that point, though you have made a good argument overall. For me, MP wasn't the key selling point for PTW, rather it was addition of 8 civs and a few new units.
Unlike you, I had nothing but problems with Civ3 out of the box (1.07f). My problems were so severe that Firaxis offered to send me a no-cd patch, something I had never needed with any other title. However, before they could send it to me they released 1.16f, which solved whatever problem I was having.
With PTW, I haven't experienced one crash, bug, or glitch. To me, because I'm partial to SP, that's the key difference between the two. Therefore, I'm satisfied with the product thus far.
For those who want this game solely for MP, they probably are better off waiting for the next patch. If Firaxis' track record regarding fixing outstanding problems with Civ3 is any indication of how they'll address the ones in PTW, then I'm confident that they will remedy whatever problems exist.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Antonin
|
|
quote: Originally posted by [FX]Roman
I bought it within like a week of it going gold, Civ3 that is, and it was fine. I was absurdly much more happy with it than I am with PTW. |
I bought Civ3 the day it arrived in stores, and thought it was just fine. I enjoyed it when I bought it and still enjoy playing it.
I have not bought PtW yet and I'm glad I didn't. I'll wait for the problems to be sorted....
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|