 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:23
|
|
Election results are just coming in, so things are still unclear, but I have a very bad feeling that the Republicans wil gain control of the senate, keep the house, and that democrats will win the govenorships.
This is a terrible outcome in my opinion: BUsh will be able to pass more of his agenda and judges, while the democrats will get the wonderful job of handling the implosion of state budgets in the next few years.
Now, Let Jimmy and Fez and other gloat and dance around and be obnixious: I am sure I would not be very likable to them if the democrats swept everything. At the same time, in my opinion this is a horrible possible outcome and bodes badly for the US. But I do not blame voters (you never can), This is a huge failure by Democrats, a huge one. The democratic leadership over the last 2 years has been utterly spineless and without principles. I hate the principles of this admin, but at least they have some.
Bush is a man that won only because more votes for Gore were deemed invalid than ones for him. Yet the democratcs never sought to savage a man who had 0 mandate, in fact, less than zero mandate. They did nothing to derail the tax cut: many went along, and even during this election most backed it. After 9/11 the allowed the santification of Bush and the growth of his cult of personality. What have they done with their control of the Senate? At best, they fought to block his judges, but on most issues have fought cheap battles with no aim, such as the one over homeland security , yeah, we back this idiotic idea, as long as the jobs stay union....oh, you don't want them to be union? Then we fight! They sought only soundbites about corporate responsibility, then just sat and did nothing as Mr. Pitt and the industry went along to undermine all 'reform'. it was not democrats at all that have forced Pitt out: most dems. would have happily let him stay.
The democrats have shown no vision for the country. Were Bush is popular, they back him. On the issues that Republicans are weak on, all they do is talk, but never take action. You don't win by fightign only to save your petty hide, you win by fighting the good fight, and the democratic party simply has not done so these last foru years.
So, I will sit back and let the conservatives gloat. Let them. I think they are leading us down a terrible path, but most people will always go with the one that's at least moving, never with the one who just sits there like a lump.

|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:23
|
|
Eevn if the democrats hold the senate by one miserable seat, whats the point?
Most fo them already abcked Bush on the Tax cut (disaster 1) and the Iraq resolution (possible disaster 2). I have yet to hear a single democrat offer some sort of plan or idea for action, something to look forward to in the future. you don't need control fo the senate to hold up judges. you still need 2/3 (I believe) for a lot of seats, so as long as the dems have 41 solid seats, they can filibuster any really objectionalbe ones.
The republicans, to win this election, ahve also watered down lots of their ideas, specially on Social security, but still, only the admin. seems to have a plan. again, I think it is a hideaous plan: that right now we should have a national themesong, and it shoul be the one playing as the guy on the look out post on the Titanic looks out at the dark sea, and slowly notices this starge black shape there... But again, since the democracts have none, even if they keep the senate all they can do is stall the Bush plan, but its all still about the Bush plan.

|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
However the Senate race turns out it is truely amazing that in an off year election after two years of economic turmoil the sitting President's party is holding its ground in Congress.
Has this ever happened before?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
MtG 
|
Thank you for your endorsement. You've confirmed I was correct in my statements.
GePap - not 20 years, and not 200. The ideology of the Greens and Libs is too fringe, and there's no particular advantage to being both centrist and independent.
Sava's the personification of what's wrong with the Democratic party - blame flag waving propaganda, those evil Republicans, a vast right-wing conspiracy, whatever, and never mind that your world view, ideology, and approach to governance is out of touch.
The Democrats should have had a field day with the economy and the latest revelations about Bush's buddy Harvey Pitt and his fun and games with William Webster's nomination.
18 years ago, Mondale undid Gary Hart with "Where's the beef?" Right now, the Democratic party has undone itself with "Where's our balls?" The touchy-feely party is afraid to offer any vision or any sense of leadership, because that's just soooo white male. Ooooh.
Hey John - were you callin' me whiny? 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
nationalist
|
 |
None of your Goddamned business
Nov 2001 time: 00:23
|
|
Sava, you're hilarious. How much of a difference do you think there really is between the Republican and Democratic parties? Not very much. Waving the bloody shirt, huh? How many Congressional Democrats voted for the Iraqi Resolution? Us Americans think that our parties are these diametrically opposed entities representing yin and yang or whatever. In reality they are anything but. If we were in Europe, the Democrats would be called left liberal, the Republicans right liberal, they'd both be put around the center of the spectrum and would probably draw about a combined 20% of the vote, if that.
However, our system is so different from the European model that party tags don't mean all that much. Afterall, John McCain and Jesse Helms share the same party, as do Joseph Lieberman and Al Sharpton. Party label doesn't mean nearly as much as personality. Congressmen almost never vote on party lines, as they do in Europe. Your stereotypes about the parties are untrue for the large part. Get a grip. We have two large parties that are so moderate and inclusive that it is hard to get anything accomplished even if the same party controls the Presidency, the House, and the Senate. Personally, I belong to neither party, I didn't vote, and I don't really care too much who wins. I personally feel disenfranchised by our system. Both sides have almost identical messages, anyway. I just take joy in watching the Libertarians getting crushed .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Carver
But the flag waving rightwing BS (US or Confederate flag, its all good) works dang well apparently. The Republican Senate canidate in Georgia won largely because he painted the Dem, Max Cleland - a veteran triple amputee, as weak on defense. What bullsh_t.
Americans are so stupid and prejudiced...my God. |
You know this stuff never fails to amaze me.
People say George Bush is stupid. People say Americans are stupid. George Bush is the immensely popular leader of the most powerful nation in the world.
God forbid we get smart huh.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|