 |
|  |
 |
|
notyoueither
|
 |
of naught
Aug 2001 time: 22:23
|
|
Step right up and sign up.
There are 3 schools. Economic, Tactician, and Diplomat.
Each member may sign up for 2 of the schools. Each school decides on a leader (or chief) to guide the Player(s). All of the members of the school help the Chief to formulate the plans for their area. The Economists is where most of the work is, but the Diplomats have to put out too. The Tacticians either bring home silver for alva to polish, or they might as well not come home.
The Economists: they run most of the show.
alexman
Arrian
asleepathewheel
FrustratedPoet
ManicStarSeed
nbarclay
Randolph
Sir Ralph
Velociryx
Conqueror
The Tacticians: they think they run the show.
alexman
Arrian
Dominae
FrustratedPoet
Meshelic
nbarclay
Randolph
Sir Ralph
Theseus
Velociryx
alva848
Conqueror
The Diplomats: they tell the rest of us what to do.
alva848
asleepathewheel
DeepO
Dominae
ManicStarSeed
Meshelic
zeit
People assigned:
alexman
alva848
Arrian
asleepathewheel
DeepO*
Dominae
FrustratedPoet
ManicStarSeed
Meshelic
nbarclay
Randolph
Sir Ralph
Theseus*
Velociryx
zeit*
Conqueror
People unassigned:
notyoueither
OPD
* 2nd pick pending
Last edited by Meshelic on 26-11-2002 at 02:44
|
|
|  |
 |
|
zeit
|
 |
Meet my blade!
Sep 2002 time: 06:23
|
|
It would seem that politicaly wise no one should pick being a member of only one school, as being a member in two schools means you can vote for leaders on two schools, promote your actions in one school with that of the other and being overall more influencial- However, since i rather being Diplomat than a politician- Sign me up for the Diplomats.
And to quote the wise Sun Tzu, that his compilation of "The art of War" should not only serve as a guide for the tacticians, but also for us the diplomats: "How to achieve that which foils the foe's ploys, and prevents his victory- that is a feat thet commoners cannot understand. Every man can see those tricks i use to triumph, but no man can see that strategy which leads me to victory"
This was written in the context of the basics of ploys and tricks, and this gets to the bottom of it, and makes the Diplomacy school different from the Economist and Tacticans- the first are concerned with analysis and problem definition, the second are with- what is the best course of action to achieve this goal or that goal, and diplomats are the strategists, that make the connection between the two other schools.
That was pretty much philosophical- but it would be interesting to see how this really turns out- will we see different schools have different attitudes in the process of decision making in the inter-school discussion that reflect those differences?
edited: missing word.
Last edited by zeit on 14-11-2002 at 04:27
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:23
|
|
I'll sign up as:
economist
diplomat
not claiming I'm adept at either, but will help balance groups out :P
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Meshelic
|
 |
Bringer of Peace, Destroyer of Worlds
Sep 2002 time: 21:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by zeit
It would seem that politicaly wise no one should pick being a member of only one school, as being a member in two schools means you can vote for leaders on two schools, promote your actions in one school with that of the other and being overall more influencial- However, since i rather being Diplomat than a politician- Sign me up for the Diplomats. |
Alright someone to help beef up the diplomatic end!.. 
But Zeit really you should sign up for another school....it would help you out by giving your vote more impact and help the team out as well. I also think that being a part of a schola that you may not be used to or very good at will help you to learn better through being around other experienced players... 
That's one of the reasons I joined Tactician. I'm good in SP tactical things, but haven't done it ever in a Democracy game. So it's new to me but I'd like to see how I can improve my skills.
I'm hoping to learn from this, too! And I hope everyone else learns from this somehow as well...
quote: Originally posted by Zeit
That was pretty much philosophical- but it would be interesting to see how this really turns out- will we see different schools have different attitudes in the process of decision making in the inter-school discussion that reflect those differences?
edited: missing word. |
Not sure what you mean but this might help. Seeing as how all the members in this team will be divided into 3 schools of 4 or 5 people each, then if the members of those schools wish to join forces and influence a particular vote then they can, and if that's close to what you mentioned I'm glad you did.
The schools are mostly a learning tool, but also serve as a unique way to elect the ministers; for example : all the guys 'trained' in Diplomacy elect a 'speaker' or 'chief' to represent the foreign ministry, while the remaining 'students' act like his deputies in a way, helping him with jobs, this and that, etc.
As far as schools influencing votes, I'm not sure how that would work out. Since every member is in two schola's (presumably) then the impact of schola's siding with each other or against each other is lessened overall, because everyone in a way has two votes....
this sound right? 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
zeit
|
 |
Meet my blade!
Sep 2002 time: 06:23
|
|
Actually i didn't join any other school, what i meant was that the way i see it Diplomats are more aligned towards Strategic thinking, Tacticians are towards tactical thinking and Economists are more into analysis and breaking down a problem to its basic components/varibales. What i might find interesting to observe is: Are our diplomats going to influence more on the startegic part of decision making- What are main goals should be over long periods of time or what is our policy towards pillaging cities for example. Are the representatives of the two other schools will reflect oter approaches towards issues like: the Economists will come with a report regarding corruption and revolts in future occupied cities compared to where we stand or will stand if we sack the cities, all the while the tactician will try to influence in the practical matters, at the field level- how many units we should assign to attack on this city or that city if we plan to sack/keep the city.
Does this make more sense?
Oh, and i rather stick with Diplomacy school, but thank you Meshelic for your encouragement. As you said- schools are for teaching and learning, and as such i don't think i see them as a real decision making bodies, and if they are, i rather concentrate my efforts in one of those, in this case, the Diplomacy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:23
|
|
Question re: economists
do we determine how the land will be worked? citizens to be managed?
Who will determine the science researched, the economists or the tacticians?
how will the groups work together when analyzing trade issues?
Have these questions been answered in another thread?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Meshelic
|
 |
Bringer of Peace, Destroyer of Worlds
Sep 2002 time: 21:23
|
|
Hmmm I'll leave the *official* response to NYE, but in simplest terms I think it goes somewhat like this.
Tactical Schola - Heads up the areas of city construction (settlers), commanding military units, naval units, etc.
Economical - connects cities with construction of roads, irrigation, mines, etc. (Infrastructure) , adjusts luxury bar, domestic duties
Diplomatic - foreign affairs, deals solely with human players (and AI of course) , helps draft government plans
The President is voted from one of these and Science is decided by ALL
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|