 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
I dont know what the hell is up with the Role Players. Togas does not know what to do. I just wish they pick a civ and get over with it. Maybe they should just flip a coin or something.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
Here is a message I got from Togas:
"Jack,
Here's a few things that have been discussed in our thread about what to do with the Carthage dilema.
Some of my tribesmen have felt that we could "trade" favors for Carthage. I'll list of few of their more reasonable requests here:
Agree to give us two of the ancient era techs, or one of the middle ages techs after our civs meet up.
Declare war on someone we're at war with ... sort of an early game mutual defense agreement.
Agree to give us "most favored nation" trade status where you guys would sell us techs and maps at a cheaper price than other nations.
Promise not to declare war on us at any point in the game prior to 1000 AD.
What do you think? Do any of these requests sound like a reasonable trade?
But all that aside, I DO want to stress that I want to see our nations work together in the coming game. I hope that we can engage in a healthy and productive trade agreement ... research different techs and trade them, exchange maps, do RoPs, back each other in alliances, etc. I hope that this early Carthage issue doesn't affect our relations in the game and I look forward to working with you further.
--Togas"
Thus as you can see we can still play Carthage, we will just have to make a deal with them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:23
|
|
I agree with
- the "most favored nation"
- the non-war clause
I'd negociate on :
- giving techs. I prefer offering them very pleasing deals, but not giving them completely offhand.
I'd refuse :
- The automatic alliance clause. I'm very glad the Roleplayers want to have a good relationship with us, and we should be more willing to ally with them. BUT, we cannot commit ourselves so much before knowing what the precise situation will be.
Overall, if the Roleplayers are sincere (which will be known only once the game starts), those "concessions" they ask for is simply a good allied policy. I'd be very happy if we could have trustful allies in the game, and I assume they'd be very happy too. 
Carthage is good, and we can make concessions for it. However, it's not great enough to accept blindly all the suggestions.
With my position, I assume the roleplayers will be happy to give us Carthage, because I assume they don't expect us to accept everything.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|