 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:23
|
|
Well, the Olympics should help Beijing as a city.
Overall, I'm optimistic about China's future, although I think it will be more tumultuous than hoped. The Party is planning on about 7.5% real growth per annum for the next 20 years (faster than the last 20 years, even though population growth is slowing drastically). I can't say it's unrealistic, but it's extremely tough to accomplish, and relies a good deal on luck.
For instance, about 1/10th of China's economy (currency basis) is tied to exports to the US. This should grow, but I don't think it will grow at 7.5% a year every year during this time.
Last edited by DanS on 17-11-2002 at 07:03
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Alinestra Covelia
|
 |
I sense the dodgy presence of Bing - a presence I've not felt since...
Feb 2000 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
"Probably ousting him in some way, like the other Hu before him."
Could somebody describe what actions were taken to do this on Hu #1? Who was Hu #1 and what got him in trouble?
Educate DanS. |
If I recall rightly (and I was only eight years old at the time, living in Beijing) the "first" Hu was a liberal who advocated democracy in Chinese politics. This split the Communist party leaders, with a hard core opposing but a largely younger generation trying to iron out how a system could work.
In the end, Deng Xiaoping dismissed the idea, and Hu's following diminished as political fallout took place, although he did remain within the CCP itself.
Fast forward to 1989, the year of Tiananmen. This is the same year that Hu died of liver failure (?) and university students express their sorrow with memorials, which the government discourages. The CCP believes the issue has been decided.
During Gorbachev's visit, the students demonstrate in Tiananmen and Li Peng opens talks with their spokespersons. Posthumously, Hu becomes something of a figurehead during Tiananmen.
After the violent crackdown, the hardliners took power. Deng, however, continued to institute economic changes while carefully avoiding any potential political destabilizers.
The result is that China is currently running a weird hybrid of Free Market *** Planned economics, while still remaining much of a Police State.
(This translates roughly to +2 Support +2 Econ +2 Growth +2 Industry -4 Efficiency -2 Police -2 Planet and an outlay of 195 energy credits over around four years or so.)
Note - the present Hu has no blood relation to the previous Hu. Nor is he related to my housemate Hu Man Bing, whom I fervently hope never gets admitted into any government anywhere.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ranskaldan
|
 |
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Winston
There are numerous reports of organized, forced sterilizations of women in Tibet. |
There is, frankly, no official advocation for sterilizations of any kind. This is often done by local officials who are eager to up their records.
quote: Also the ongoing massive, centrally controlled, migration of ethnic Chinese into Tibet have been reported several times, along with some reports that these immigrants are not under any restrictions wrt. number of children. |
Migration, yes.
On the other hand, it is people of Chinese descent who are subject to the one-child policy, while minorities (i.e. Tibetans) are not.
quote: Of course the same concerns apply to mistreated native populations elsewhere, but I'm talking about what China does to Tibet. |
Tibetans, btw, are full Chinese citizens, with no "colonial" "sub-special" status. You might as well ask what China's leaders are doing to China.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
Just like the European immigrants once colonized the North American continent, Tibet will be colonized by the Chinese. The main difference here is that Chinese will not kill off any significant portion of the natives, unlike the Europeans.
If some Europeans can somehow think they can behave morally superior in these matters, they are wrong.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Winston
Except for the 400 years' difference in time and enlightenment. |
So, you are basically saying that you Europeans can get away with genocides after the passage of time.
Well, that shows what kind of person you really are and what you really think.
Tibet or else, they are just something you could use to make other countries look worse compared to yours and thus make yourself feel superior.
Still the same European obsession with cultural and moral superiority.
Last edited by Lord Merciless on 17-11-2002 at 12:40
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
Well, Tibet had suffered quite a bit from the late 50s until the mid 70s, with famine, cultural revolution, and all. But Tibet was hardly alone in this aspect, since the whole China was equally messed up during the same period. Mao's crazy social engineering experiment basically screwed over everyone.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|