 |
|
Dominae
|
|
I was away this weekend and after reading the results of the vote this morning I specifically resisted the urge to "make my vote count". Doesn't holding out in order to see everyone else's votes sort of make the whole process undemocratic?
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
Arrian, I'm not really bothered by it either way (like you, I believe both Egyptians and Iroquois to be fine choices), but by voting last your vote does "count more" than the earlier votes (especially with such a small population). If I were the last to vote with Egypt and Iroquois neck in neck, then it would be my vote that decided it, ultimately. Based on less information, I can't be help responsible for more than my share of the vote.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:23
|
|
Right, I do think that Legoland was considering Egypt. We don't know what civ the new team will pick either.
edit: I think its legoland;s second choice.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:23
|
|
When do we reveal this to the world? do we hold onto it for a few more days, closer to the start date?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:23
|
|

At least our civ is known... so it's time to tackle the next big issue: city placement! 
As to choices: I think the blocks were considering it as a second choice, after Cartaghe (in which the RPGers were also interested). Logically, if they decide it to be 2nd choice, and we take it as a first, we should get it. However, if it comes to that I do propose we at least consider giving it to them, as a fair play thing. I would like Cleo more then that other guy (I can't even remember the Iroquois chief), but this will certainly mean that we could find an ally here.
Or, another idea, if the legos don't get Carthage, and would be forced out of Egypt because we picked it first, why don't we sell it to them? I know the perfect thing to sell it for: Their worker. We could negotiate in which turn they should give it up (but certainly not later then turn 20), and this would give us most of the benefits of Egypt anyway. Ohh... that seems like a good plan 
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:23
|
|
Well... think about it: that first worker is relatively fast replaced. It will mean that your empire is lacking some 5 turns behind everyone else, but if this means you get your preferred choices.... Besides, as builders the options aren't that great, we as a balanced team could make any tribe work, but not them.
And, as we first have to meet, it is a risk before we know the map: if we meet in turn 10, they are hampered, if however me meet in turn 50, we don't get anything out of that one worker. (the Iroquois aren't industrious, so one slave is nothing, and we even have to pay upkeep for him as he was bought, and not conquered)
DeepO
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|