 |
|  |
 |
|
Ghengis-Sean
|
|
Okay, here's a question for all you smart kids out there. When a Civ's UU kills something for the first time your Civ rolls into a Golden Age. Now Korea's UU is that Rocket launcher thingy; the hwach'a (how in the hell is that supposed to be pronounced by the way?) Any way, the question is, the hwach'a a bombarment unit, when was the last time you bombarded someone to death???
I mean a cannon can do 1 hp of damage, no matter how cool the hwach'a is, it's going to be a pain in the but to go out and actually KILL something with it. Artillery is not designed to kill in this game, it's designed to soften units up so your attack units can kill them off. Killing something with the hwach'a is going to be tricky I think.
So I guess the Koreans either get really lucky with their rocket launcher, or they build a wonder and get lucky from that. Sucks to be them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sheik
|
|
It does not have any lethal bombard but does have the starts golden age flag checked.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Minmaster
|
|
So Cal
Nov 2001 time: 21:23
|
|
it says it does on civ3.com civ profiles, but it doesnt in actual game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ghengis-Sean
|
|
The Koreans are a Commercial Scientific civ, and the Hwach'a replaces the cannon, has a move of 1, ROF 1, bombard 12 (versus the cannon's 8) . Based on the artwork I'm assuming that it's some kind of rocket launcher, which is pretty good figuring that artillery also has a bombard of 12. It's a good unit, just don't expect to rush out and start your golden age off. Generally speaking I don't tend to build alot of artillery units, so I'm not sure how hot I am to try this one out.
A better unit might be the "Turtle" ships the Koreans used to cut the Japanese army off from Japan with (thereby forcing the Japan to get out of Korea) in the 1590's. They were a sort of armor plated galleon, used to interdict shipping. Considering the Koreans were never really noted for amazing artillery, it's interesting that Firaxis chose this particular unit. Of course alot of their other choices are pretty goofy too, the Berserk requires INVENTION??? uh, my history might be off but didn't the Vikings come BEFORE knights and pikeman and longbowmen? and the reason they went away is because knights and longbowman and pikeman sort of beat them out? Well not in Firaxis land apparently

|
|
|  |
 |
|
CJM
|
|
Can you even build cannons as the Koreans? Or does the hwach'a replace it? I wonder this, first, because I don't have my manual handy and can't recall, and second, because the C'pedia is somewhat dynamic; the upgrade paths described take into account UU's. Maybe the C'pedia is not showing cannons as upgradable because you cannot build them...?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
vondrack

|
 |
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002 time: 06:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Chronus
Anyway, the part that kind of throws me off is this: catapults and hwach'as can upgrade to artillery . . . but cannons cannot???? At least, that's according to the Civilopedia. I haven't tried upgrading a cannon yet so I was wondering if someone can confirm this. |
Cannons DO upgrade to artillery. Personally upgraded some yesterday, playing my second PtW game (which I lost, too ).
Koreans were one of my rivals in that game and, guys, they rocked! The commercial+scientific combo made them RICH. I have never seen an AI civ wallowing in so much money (Standard Map, Monarch: 15000+ gold in 1600's? ...). And they had just an ordinary sized (maybe even a bit smaller than others) empire.
The funny thing was that they built the UN (yes, I know, I sucked terribly... ...but can you imagine fighting not a single war throughout the whole game? Not a single leader, no GA... next time, I will allow myself at least a small war... ), prevented the vote at first, but 11 turns later, allowed the vote to take place. Guess what? They lost to Cathy... 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ghengis-Sean
|
|
according to the Civlopdea, if you build the internet you'll get a golden age (if you haven't had one already) regardless of what your civ stats are.
The problem with Korea getting a golden age from a wonder is that none of the wonders are both Commercial and scientific. The Chinese are militaaristic and Industrious, so if they build the Great Wall, off they go.
Korea is pretty screwed as far as Golden ages go. As a civ, they do pretty well, at least in my games (all three of them) not too big, not too bad, but decent, great culture, and wealthy. A Golden Age could push them from being good to great. Did Firaxis play test this? Didn't one of the players say, hey, Korea doesn't get golden ages, what's the deal? I guess everyone was playing the mongols 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zero
|
 |
Bouncing back and forth
Sep 2002 time: 00:23
|
|
First of all this post has been filled with many many confusion among whats said in manual, chat and in civlopedia. If you played civ 3 already you should know no source is 100% reliable since they make llast minute changes and they just stupidly make errors sometimes.
anyway, like warpstorm says, you can't give them a lethal bombardment cause that would make them TOO powerful. I agree. Hwach'a is a great UU its just that it can't trigger a GA (huge handicapp) but with lethal bombardment, that will make it almost godly... Players who make 30+ artillery know what I'm talking about. We're talking something of a equivalent to a unit that can shoot out mini cruise missles every turn without killing itself. Thats sick. Why even radar artillery will look inferior to the mighty hwach'a w/ lethal bombard...
any experienced early industrial era warmongers will tell you artillery support is crucial in times when defense seems to reign supreme. Having a UU not too far around that era, PLUS being lethal will just totally unbalance the game.
Tho I don't think Hwach'a is terrible or godly, In my mod, i took out the hwach'a and gave the korean a UU longbowmen. They are 5/1/1 same cost. they are pretty famous for their archery skills so i thought it was appropriate.
Americans have the same problem except the air superiority option allows you to intercept enemy aircraft... so they can get away with not having to rely entirely on wonder building. Still, US and Korea is pretty much on the same boat in that they often rely on wonder build.
I generally rely on wonder building as a trigger to GA, I understand this method is a bit trickier then having a UU win a battle, but I find civ like aztec, iroquois, persia, rome and especially greek and zulu annoying because of their early GA. I prefer to have mine at mid to late Medieval age as much as possible. God I hate having primary defender as UU since when enemy comes to attack, you have no choice but to cause GA!
Last edited by Zero on 22-11-2002 at 11:23
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|