 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
That design is horrific.
|
Don't worry, its not the one being considered.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:23
|
|
fly too high youll burn your wings...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:23
|
|
boreholes
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Adagio

|
|
I just re-read an article about, what plans there have been for Ground Zero...and that one beats them all...in ugliness and boringness...
The pictures in that article were much greater...
Btw...the article was from a science magazine (I believe that's the word...)
Last edited by Adagio on 23-11-2002 at 20:36
|
|
|  |
 |
|
123john321
|
|
I seen it, WAY too unreasilies, COPPER PADS!!! Really, some one could hijack it, put guns on it, and treeorist the cities, REALLY!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DRoseDARs

|
 |
"My god, it's full of peas..."
Jul 2002 time: 21:23
|
|
ADG, those are atrocious designs. The "Mutant Aliens from Pluto" look is so hideous it makes me physically ill. The only time that such designs remotely look appropriate to me is when they're used for Art Galleries/Museums.
And Kepler, FLW's Mile High was meant for Chicago, not New York (I was born in Chicago, so for me to say otherwise would be blasphemous ). They should get a design tailored for their skyline, not someone else's.
For the naysayers of the link I provided, I like that design not because of its looks (which yes, could be better...), but because of its practicality. It makes efficient use of the space alotted to it, in that instead of a cluster of short buildings seperated by large, open spaces, it's a tight group of four 1300 foot towers inter-connected and cross-braced for support in the event of a major disaster. The sheer girth of the building almost garauntees (sp?) that the impact of a commercial jet would not be enough to bring it down. Such a large building allows more opportunity for escape and more ways of bringing in resources like water and electricity to combat fires. And in addition to the above, this is Lower Manhattan we're talking about people, on of the most valuable and expensive stretches of land in the world. Do you really believe that the WTC site is going to be made into a 16 acre park? It just won't happen, despite the emotional charge of the issue. The WTC was too important an institution to allow it to remain as dust. They must rebuild it and its former site is the most sensible place to rebuild.
Like I said, the design I linked to may not be the most creative and inspiring design, but it is the most practical, given the economy and also the public's traditional jitteriness/cautiousness/warriness towards mega-projects of bizarre designs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
Oh, great, another kitsch monstrosity by that hack Ghery. It'll be the equivalent of looking at a tacky 60's strip mall in 20 years. Build three of them!
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|