 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:24
|
|
imran just because you prefer your books written for children and therefore easier to comprehend in less amount of time doesnt mean that they are better...
i will always find the world tolkien wrote about and the people in infinitely more interesting than the christ child potter.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:24
|
|
http://travel.guardian.co.uk/galler...4317647,00.html! take that poofter!
oh my god, you have to be kidding me...rush better than zeppelin!?!?!? rush had great musicians but that singer was terrible...terrible!!! you cant listen to that without your **** getting hugified by men...
and i dont even think gay people like Rush...at least i hope they dont, that would set bad precident...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:24
|
|
shhhhhhhhhhh!
no, i understand the concept of opinion, i just like prodding the old folks on the board about their love with children books...
if you like potter so be it, it doesnt matter really.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:24
|
|
Flying monkeys, best villians ever
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:24
|
|
i do indeed...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:24
|
|
i just dont like mania among adults for childish things
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:24
|
|
rowling uses cliches and similar plot devices through all the books...and harry is a little poofter brat
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Six Thousand Year Old Man
|
 |
Ad Rock
Aug 2000 time: 00:24
|
|
I liked LOTR. I tried to read one of the Potter books - I think it was the second - but lost interest. So I can't say whether I got hold of a bad one, but personally, if the others are like it, there's no comparison.
To me, LOTR has so many levels - the genealogies, the elvish poetry, the developed, varied cultures - that it's a much more impressive work, IMO. Consider the era when Tolkein wrote the books - diversity in culture was much less accepted, fantasy literature wasn't a genre at all. In that sense, LOTR was groundbreaking, IMO. Besides enjoying the story itself, I enjoyed the breadth of the story, and the attention to detail.
I read the Hobbit, and that is a book that was more intended for children, IIRC. It didn't appeal to me as much, because it seemed a very 'bare bones', simple story. I guess I like detail - to me, that's art.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
1. LOTR is boring. Sure, it invented fantasy, but there are a number of books that are much better; for instance, the Song of Ice and Fire series.
2. Harry Potter is like anything by Turtledove. It's amusing, but it isn't anything special; no deep meanings, no great literature. It's crap, but it's amusing crap (though, I've only read 30 or so pages from a single book). Really, they're ideal pre-teen books.
3. Zep is God. Any other opinion is blasphemy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: 2. Harry Potter is like anything by Turtledove. It's amusing, but it isn't anything special; no deep meanings, no great literature. It's crap, but it's amusing crap (though, I've only read 30 or so pages from a single book). Really, they're ideal pre-teen books. |
My suggestion: Read more than 30 pages .
It may not have deep meanings (well maybe other than be tolerant) or great literature, but many, many books don't fit that. You are going to have a Hell of a lot of books labeled crap then. Every Steven King novel, every Tom Clancy book. They may not be great literature or have deeper meanings (and let's be serious, LOTR doesn't have a deeper meaning either), but that doesn't mean they are crap.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: @ the idea of comparing Turtledove and Rowling together…
Not making any value judgements here, just saying it's ridiculous to even say them in the same sentence! |
I'm totally serious. The only reason I read Turtledove is because the alternate historical genre in general is so bleak, and I love alternate history! 
quote: That's the problem with you anarchists, you see the world in black and white.
Good or crap. No middle, and you wonder why people think you guys are nuts . |
It's not bad, it just isn't all that good. I mean, I'd read it if it fell into my lap and I'm not reading anything interesting at the moment, but I wouldn't go looking for it.
quote: :shrug: That's what I thought after reading the first book (frankly it is difficult to put a HP book down after you pick it up). You have the same fantasy crap, but a world filled with wizards in the background and even a boarding school for them. One word: COOL! |
Errr.. right. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|