 |
|
Zylka
|
|
quote: So what you're saying is you have no possible explanation for how they'd find out? |
In the cases that they do find out? Of course. As a relationship grows, deeper layers of one's personality are revealed through empathetic discussion - you should know this. Many may hide the truth even after the relationship is over (I honestly couldn't set a range at what portion), but many tell - at one point or another. It happens
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Faboba
OK... i'm confused now. What the hell's the difference. You don't know... they don't tell... listen if you're the one that slept with HIM/HER/IT/THEY you obviously don't have any problems with how they look or act or screw or don't have high enough standards to care in which case... what's the difference. |
It's absolutely disgusting either way. Are you saying there's no difference if you never find out you were drugged and date-raped?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
quote: If you want my honest opinion, Zylka, if you're being serious -- I think you and your attitude are far greater a threat to far more people than any transvestite ever will.
|
Please, do elaborate.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
The cause of (in this case) filth and rape must be destroyed. I'm defending the rights of a greater society and all you're worried about is access to a twisted mistake (mistaken as a right) of a handfull of people in need of serious help.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
That's not what I said at all.
But it's the same logic used behind wanting homosexuality outlawed. You can't stand the thought that you may have had sex with someone who was born a man and became a woman later so it "ruins" the family, and some people can't stand the thought of having a homosexual "ruin" the family.
Same argument, different nouns, same ****. |
Don't keep too close to your rhetorical experience on homosexuality: I haven't mentioned the family unit once. This is about the individual versus the individual, and one of them is placing a terrible crime on the other
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
Fair enough, then.
Why don't you just cut to the chase and make it mandatory for people who got a sex-change to notify future sexual partners that they have had a sex change? Much like they'd need to do if they had HIV or other STDs.
I still don't think that's right, but I wouldn't go protesting a law passed like that though... |
I didn't know there was a law concerning STDs and AIDs, but that's good news. Unfortunately, this is a necessary evil - I'd rather outlaw the two sources themselves, but obviously enough, you can't outlaw disease.
A sex change is a practise which can be stopped through law. Allowing the core problem to go on and then policing the results is a little creepy and contradictory IMO. As well, there is too much of a grey area and not enough assurance of obedience and enforcement.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Stefu
|
 |
CLOWNS WIT DA DOWNS 4 LIFE YO!
Jan 1970 time: 07:23
|
|
Rather... telling... that Zylka posts this thread after Friday night.
Last edited by Stefu on 30-11-2002 at 15:55
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|