 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I notice that the other civs are starting to have foreign ministers and the like
I think that our controller should be the foreign minister, so that everyone gets the chance to do foreign ministery stuff
Jon Miler
|
|
| |
|
|
|
flash9286
|
|
i think we should assign everybody a team
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jon Miller
|
|
but than everything will be ineffient
Jon Miller
|
|
| |
|
|
|
flash9286
|
|
ineffient? what does that mean
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jon Miller
|
|
sorry misspelling
basically the idea is that if there is more than one foreign minister at a time, thatwe will ose coherency in our foreign affairs
also, what is done in the foriegn affairs office might be different than what the controller wants
I think that it is best that at a given time, we have one person for every duty (the controller controlls all)
now if the controller chooses to give away some of his duties, that might be fine (or might be grounds for no confidence)
Jon Miller
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000
time: 07:24
|
|
IMO the job of foreign minister is not to decide whether we accept certain trade deals or other stuff at some specific turn, but to keep contacts with leaders of other civs, arrange long term agreements etc.
So instead of giving every controller the option to completely change our deals and alliances every 10 turns, we need someone keep all these stuff in one frame, with steady progress(unlike the erratic one that will happen if every controller does what he wants).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jon Miller
|
|
but if the actions of the controller are different than the minister?
what than
IT hink that is giving the minister to much power
Jon Miller
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jon Miller
|
|
basically the controller should be how we show ourselves
the controller should speak with our voice anyway
everybody should get a chance to lead the team, and to do so in evrey way
and to ahve that be the same person, gives us the advantage of coherence
Jon Miller
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Eli
IMO the job of foreign minister is not to decide whether we accept certain trade deals or other stuff at some specific turn, but to keep contacts with leaders of other civs, arrange long term agreements etc.
So instead of giving every controller the option to completely change our deals and alliances every 10 turns, we need someone keep all these stuff in one frame, with steady progress(unlike the erratic one that will happen if every controller does what he wants). |
the controller is eld responsible to us as a group and to the no confidence vote
the arranging of long term agreements should be done wiith us as a group, and take place through the offices of the controller
Jon Miller
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jon Miller
|
|
basically the controller is picked to represent us in the game
to be our voice
as such he should be our voice outside of the game as well
for as long as he is in office
Jon Miller
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Jon Miller
|
|
the controller is responsible for current affairs right now
if he chooses to have others help him that is cool
if people disagree make up a poll offering an alternative and we can argue and vote on it
Jon Miller
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24.
Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-11-2002 22:50
Always keeping your options open, eh Jon? 
|