 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Saint Marcus
another false argument. |
No -- "another false argument" is a false argument.
Do you have any clue how logic works, Marcus? When people are giving an opinion, how can it be a "false argument"? And for that matter, what *IS* a "false argument"? 
quote: Freedom is a human right, but if someone kills someone else, that freedom is taken away. Same with nations. |
Freedom is therefore a privledge, if it can be taken away if you screw something up...
quote: says who? for centuries, millenia, it was very RIGHT. What makes your claim more valid than the claim of someone who lived in the American South in 1800, of the Roman who lived in 200 AD, etc. |
Very good attempt to try to once again avoid the issue.
My ideals are different than the people back then. My ideals are that people should do whatever they want, provided it doesn't hurt other people. If it does hurt other people, it should be stopped.
For that reason, if a country supports terrorism, it loses its right to sovereignty.
When a person commits murder, it loses its right to sovereignty.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
Slavery doesn't work with capitalism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
Well, John Howard shook the tree, and look at all the little acorns that came falling down.
I hope it helped the various authorities in the countries of origin of the "spokesmen".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ravagon
|
|
Australia
Sep 1999 time: 13:24
|
|
That statement is much more bark than bite if you consider the Australian power-projection capabilities (or rather, the lack thereof).
Very few countries are geographically threatened in any way - Indonesia and perhaps New Guinea at most.
Only real effect is in generating sound-bytes for the National press, and the other SE-Asian leaders have to know it and are just responding in kind.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
That may be true.
But, whilst we may be able to "kick ass", there's no way we could hold on to conquered territory.
There's just too many of them, and not enough of us.
In reality, there is little doubt, that if we knew such a group was present and was planning a terrorist act in Australia, the best course of action would be to catch them entering Australia - then do them in.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lars-E
|
|
John H wants to treat Asia the way the US has treated their own backyard?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:24
|
|
I would love to see Australia try this stupid little policy...
As for the people out there demaniding an end to national sovereignty to fight 'terrorism': its a two way sword. There are plenty of toehr states that might just as well challenge old US policies and state that the US, or at least certain US personel or government officials have supported Terorism in the past, and thus the US must hand over these individual or face consequences.
NOw, you hawks might state: hell, the US is stronger, let them try. And then we start having diplomats thrown out, and anti-US riots, and all sorts fo nasty little things happen. Fine, you and I won't care, but plenty of Americans, and Australians, will. Interestingly enough, the people who deman the sovereignty of these states are the biggest boosters of their own: HYPOCRITES.
"Terrorism" is a definition, not a 'thing'. You don't get to chose law, or chose rights. Devalue one, and all of them go.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|