 |
|
Maquiladora
|
|
During a turn chat is obviously the best option and itll feel more like a community game but it could be dodgy for the President to constantly alt-tab out of the game, i get crashes after about 8 or 9 times or it freezes.
I vote in Turn Chat/Thread still though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
H Tower
|
|
while turn chat would be nice, it would be difficult to do. and besides i think that well written orders by the ministers would be able to prvent the need for the turn chat
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gilgamensch
|
|
France
Jun 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
I admit, I voted: play on its own.
My reason behind:
1.) Some people have only limited online time.
2.) different time zones (could be fairly hard to get it under one hat) (like those funny Americans +6, and the Aussies -9 and above)
3.) and couple of other ones..........
If the orders are clear, also in general terms, we shouldn't need a chat while playing. This would defently make life easier for the Pres.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
H Tower
|
|
if the pres wants to hold a turn chat, its fine by me, but i don't want him to be limited to a turn chat.
a detailed blow-by-blow account for each turn should keep the citizenry sufficiently updated on what happs int he game
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gilgamensch
|
|
France
Jun 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
Lemmy,
doesn't sound to bad, but let's apply WCS again:
What do you want to do if the Pres. is choosing the worst option for us, the citizens?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mapfi
|
|
Zurich, Switzerland
Jul 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
As I've stated before I don't want to make the pres hold a turnchat - play on specific orders works just as well. He can always hold a turnchat if he wants to, and we might only elect a pres that promises to do so but no need to fix it in the constitution.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gilgamensch
|
|
France
Jun 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
That's kind of what I had in mind......
Follow the normal orders and in case needed set up a chat, like with 1-2 days notice.
And no, we should have it in the connie, that we could nail somebody to it, WCS!!!!!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
H Tower
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Gilgamensch
Lemmy,
doesn't sound to bad, but let's apply WCS again:
|
* H Tower figures out after a few minutes of pondering that WCS==Worst Case Scenario 
quote:
What do you want to do if the Pres. is choosing the worst option for us, the citizens? |
blame the ministers for bad orders 
Seriously though, I don't think playing the game poorly is a good reason to impeach the pres, the minister's orders, as expressed through the people should provide ample support to the president. If the pres plays poorly for a round, the people are responsible for giving constructive criticism (not the other kind fo criticism) and telling the pres how to fix the mistakes.
If the President makes bad decisions after not following orders, I still don't think that is enough reason to impeach, I believe that if the President can offer a good reason for disobeying orders, (like an order to shrink the military if the largest nation which is right next door to us declares war upon us). I'm not huge fan of removing people from office easily, I think that at heart, every member of the government will want to make the right decision, but there are grey areas, afterall, computer games are not well defined math formulas
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gilgamensch
|
|
France
Jun 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
Sorry gent's,
I saw it somewhere and thought: let's make it easy for myself and use it as well. Normally I am not a fan of abbreviations, but I couldn't resist 
H Tower
I also don't like to throw people out of the office, at least not directly. And Yes, I am also more a fan of positive feedback.
For the impeachement: It would depend on his reasoning, if he has a good one, OK, it not 
(Sorry to say, but computer games ARE math formulas )
General:
I still hope to get as a result: play on his own.
And as already stated in the connie, the Pres. has all means to distribute/collect information. I just don't want to press anyone to hold turnchats, even if it is not needed. We could add that on the request of a resolution poll, 50% of ministers agreeing on or a court request, the Pres. has to hold a turnchat, what about this?
As already said: Some people might not want to spend 3 hours a day chatting about one turn..... but still want to see it passed via normal polls........
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pedrunn
|
 |
of Natal, Brazil
Jul 2001 time: 02:24
|
|
C'mon people we need more votes. I want to close this poll tomorrow
Last edited by Pedrunn on 05-12-2002 at 16:52
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gilgamensch
|
|
France
Jun 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
We said 1/3 of the citizens, would make 10 votes needed,as we have 11 we 'could' close it anyway...........
But let's hope more people will participate.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zaphod Beeblebrox
|
|
aachen, germany
Aug 1999 time: 05:24
|
|
on his own, reasons see a lot of above posts
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|