 |
| |
|
|
Brutus66
|
 |
Virginia
Nov 2001
time: 05:24
|
|
I just read the Open Letter thread and was pretty surprised by what I saw.
Here was an assurance of commitment from someone representing the makers, and he was drawing a lot of hostile fire.
I didn't notice much return fire from the old time defenders of the faith like asleepatthewheel, alicecooper or vondrack to name but a few.
I remember posting a thread that claimed "civ3 still stinks out loud" about a year ago, and I was virtually burned in effigy.
Now I have tried PTW, and aside from the poor internet play, I liked what I saw.
I thought the advanced unit commands were excellent. I found the single player game to really hum right along with all those commands, and I didn't need to remember any shortcut keys to move stacks, etc.
And the new game modes like regicide are lots of fun.
I found that some of the suggestions I had made on this very forum had been incorporated into the game, like the ability to name units. I asked for that, and it's in!!
It also seemed to me that some of the old annoyances are still around. For example, while playing my first LAN game, a spearman killed a tank. It happened, I swear it did. The tank was low on health, and the spearman had terrain in his favor, but it really happened.
I also saw sailing frigates sink subs.
But for the most part I really enjoyed it.
So I feel obligated to give those devils at Firaxis their due and say that I approve of their final product (especially since I am not that interested in internet play).
To all you die-hards who wanted so desperately to drag me out into the square and hang me, I concede that you have a pretty good game now. But I have a few more suggestions...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Coracle
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Brutus66
I just read the Open Letter thread and was pretty surprised by what I saw.
Here was an assurance of commitment from someone representing the makers, and he was drawing a lot of hostile fire.
I didn't notice much return fire from the old time defenders of the faith like asleepatthewheel, alicecooper or vondrack to name but a few.
I remember posting a thread that claimed "civ3 still stinks out loud" about a year ago, and I was virtually burned in effigy.
Now I have tried PTW, and aside from the poor internet play, I liked what I saw.
I thought the advanced unit commands were excellent. I found the single player game to really hum right along with all those commands, and I didn't need to remember any shortcut keys to move stacks, etc.
And the new game modes like regicide are lots of fun.
I found that some of the suggestions I had made on this very forum had been incorporated into the game, like the ability to name units. I asked for that, and it's in!!
It also seemed to me that some of the old annoyances are still around. For example, while playing my first LAN game, a spearman killed a tank. It happened, I swear it did. The tank was low on health, and the spearman had terrain in his favor, but it really happened.
I also saw sailing frigates sink subs.
But for the most part I really enjoyed it.
So I feel obligated to give those devils at Firaxis their due and say that I approve of their final product (especially since I am not that interested in internet play).
To all you die-hards who wanted so desperately to drag me out into the square and hang me, I concede that you have a pretty good game now. But I have a few more suggestions... |
What a curious post.
Internet MP play was the main purpose of PTW, and why it was pushed at us. MP should have been in the original game, and now, after the patch, it merely is bad instead of not working at all. So PTW fails in its main purpose - what people paid for.
Does PTW have several very minor useful features for SP? Yes. They should have been in the original game - or patched in - without my having to pay upwards of thirty dollars for them.
You thought "Civ 3 stinks out loud". So you earlier posted. Of course to the True Believers, the Defenders of the Faith, that was heresy. Why they defend the game I have no idea; this site promotes the game for business reasons, and that's understandable. But now, you think the game, after five patches including for the expansion, is OK? Well, let me surprise you with the following.
The Firaxis Faithful, to whom the game is a religious experience, the ones who thought it "great" twelve months ago before even the first patch, attacked me a lot more than you, and were allowed to do so by this Firaxis-friendly site. I could care less. But even I will admit that now, with PTW and its patch, the game is passably OK, if you are not interested in MP. (That's assuming that Culture Flipping stupidiity can indeed be turned off with PTW).
It still has many problems: simplified history; AI cheats; REX/settler diarrhea; pathetic naval warfare, and many other things. So it remains disappointing to me. But in it's present form it is not a rip-off. The turn-based, unit by unit, strategy game also seems rather a dinosaur now.
But that is not the point.
Firaxis ripped us all off by the beta products they sold. If I paid fifty dollars for Civ 3 (with the latest patch installed) with the features of PTW (with its latest patch), I would have complained about some faulty concepts - but I never would have been angered at their rip-off selling us buggy products. That is what they did, and they wasted a tremendous amount of my time. I never volunteered to be a beta tester spending countless hours trying to improve their product, rushed to market for the Holiday season as with PTW, not only by downloading and installing patches, but by editing the game to have it make sense, not that the editor was all that good either. And no scenarios for most of the time, and still no cheat mode as in Civ 2.
As for patches, when someone sells me defective merchandise I EXPECT it to be fixed.
I also found Briggs' letter disingenuous, and all but admitting the game wasn't playtested enough. The fact that he's being pushed by Infogrames doesn't matter to me. Firaxis will be hard-pressed to overcome their bad reputation for Civ 3 and PTW.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Traelin
|
|
Miami, FL, US
Nov 2001
time: 00:24
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Coracle
What a curious post.
Internet MP play was the main purpose of PTW, and why it was pushed at us.
|
The main purpose of PTW was indeed MP play. I agree with that. However, I guarantee the overwhelming majority of people that bought PTW did so for the SP improvements. I know I'm at least one of them. To me, the fixes in PTW were enough to buy it -- and we can't expect any gaming company to infinitely patch a product and stay in business. In fact, the only thing I'm really frustrated about is the sluggishness of the F3 (Mil. Adv.) screen. Other than that, I'm quite pleased with the end product.
quote:
Originally posted by Coracle
MP should have been in the original game, and now, after the patch, it merely is bad instead of not working at all. So PTW fails in its main purpose - what people paid for.
|
I really don't know if MP should or should not have been included in the original game. I think that's a matter of opinion. But I can say that people have the choice whether or not to buy it, and whether or not to return it.
quote:
Originally posted by Coracle
Does PTW have several very minor useful features for SP? Yes. They should have been in the original game - or patched in - without my having to pay upwards of thirty dollars for them.
|
Like I said above, how many patches can a company be expected to produce? When it comes right down to it, any for-profit company is in the market for just that -- profit. We wouldn't have any good games if it weren't for capitalism. The beauty of capitalism is that people are motivated by money, and that's a good motivation indeed.
quote:
Originally posted by Coracle
You thought "Civ 3 stinks out loud". So you earlier posted. Of course to the True Believers, the Defenders of the Faith, that was heresy. Why they defend the game I have no idea; this site promotes the game for business reasons, and that's understandable. But now, you think the game, after five patches including for the expansion, is OK? Well, let me surprise you with the following.
The Firaxis Faithful, to whom the game is a religious experience, the ones who thought it "great" twelve months ago before even the first patch, attacked me a lot more than you, and were allowed to do so by this Firaxis-friendly site. I could care less. But even I will admit that now, with PTW and its patch, the game is passably OK, if you are not interested in MP. (That's assuming that Culture Flipping stupidiity can indeed be turned off with PTW).
|
I have no idea what the motivations of this site are, and neither do you. Making assumptions can be a dangerous thing. You may be right, but when you're wrong, man will you get flambasted.
quote:
Originally posted by Coracle
It still has many problems: simplified history; AI cheats; REX/settler diarrhea; pathetic naval warfare, and many other things. So it remains disappointing to me. But in it's present form it is not a rip-off. The turn-based, unit by unit, strategy game also seems rather a dinosaur now.
But that is not the point.
|
The simplified history is obviously due to the fact that the game is an abstraction of real life. It's not meant to represent every little tiny nitpicking detail of real life.
AI doesn't exist in its purest form. I'll actually debate that it never will, or that it won't in the foreseeable future. We can be fooled into thinking it does based on sheer computing power alone, but this is another discussion for another time. Therefore, AI cheats are going to exist.
Settler diarrhea is not a problem to me, since it makes the game more challenging. IF AI ever truly exists, then maybe I'd have a problem with the notion of settler diarrhea, but as of now I consider it a challenge.
quote:
Originally posted by Coracle
Firaxis ripped us all off by the beta products they sold.
|
How was anyone ripped off? You could have taken it back if you didn't like it. I challenge anyone to find a store where being courteous and explaining the situation wouldn't at least get you an exchange for your money. I have honestly never had a problem in this arena, and I've returned/exchanged all types of products. The only way I can see them debating this is if you kept the game for six months or something. In which case I'd argue that you liked it enough to keep it for six months.
quote:
Originally posted by Coracle
If I paid fifty dollars for Civ 3 (with the latest patch installed) with the features of PTW (with its latest patch), I would have complained about some faulty concepts - but I never would have been angered at their rip-off selling us buggy products. That is what they did, and they wasted a tremendous amount of my time. I never volunteered to be a beta tester spending countless hours trying to improve their product, rushed to market for the Holiday season as with PTW, not only by downloading and installing patches, but by editing the game to have it make sense, not that the editor was all that good either. And no scenarios for most of the time, and still no cheat mode as in Civ 2.
|
Fifty dollars is a joke in a capitalist's grand scheme of things. Anyone that has fifty bucks to spend on a game should feel himself/herself fortunate. And for the replayability of Civ 3, fifty bucks is a huge joke. Look at the sales figures and return figures.
quote:
Originally posted by Coracle
As for patches, when someone sells me defective merchandise I EXPECT it to be fixed.
|
Well then you may as well never own a CPU, because you'll never be happy with any OS. Every OS is buggy, regardless of how many patches are released. Such is the nature of S/W. People are generally just satisfied with stability in S/W, and ignore minor glitches. All the major glitches were patched in Civ 3, with the exception of the auto-declaration of war when an AI uses nukes. that was fixed by PTW v1.00 though.
quote:
Originally posted by Coracle
I also found Briggs' letter disingenuous, and all but admitting the game wasn't playtested enough. The fact that he's being pushed by Infogrames doesn't matter to me. Firaxis will be hard-pressed to overcome their bad reputation for Civ 3 and PTW. |
I'm not going to speculate on what Jeff Briggs was implying or not implying. It's not fair to put words in someone's mouth.
Firaxis has hardly developed a bad reputation for Civ 3. Especially not when you compare their released product to those of companies of the same size, market capitalization, etc. Civ 3 IMHO rocks.
PTW? Well I know I'm happy with it. And I can see why the MP community has been fairly displeased. But for my money -- and for the majority of those that bought it, the SPers -- I am happy.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
cronos_qc
|
 |
Québec City
Nov 2002
time: 00:24
|
|
traelin:
You said:
"I guarantee the overwhelming majority of people that bought PTW did so for the SP improvements"
Maybe some people have money to spend or people are really generous with company?... But I know Civilization it's like for some, a religion, and we have to close our eyes even if they make some bad things...  ... cause the SP add-on not worth 30$. I'm sure that it took longuer to make the TETurkhan Mod than the new add-on in Civ3 PTW(Single Player). You understand, for 30$ buck(US)... the SP not worth what we/you paid.
All the scenario are just some rip-off burned on CD, and burn with some errors(like missing file), new civilization are easy to made by yourself, the new stacks command are just a things that can be give in a patch... The only thing that make PTW worth paying 30$(US) or44$(CDN) bucks is the MP plus SP Improvement...
I bought it, cause I love Civilization, and I wanted to play good game with friend. Play with human it's totally different to play with CPU.
I just really dont think the PTW Single Player worth 30$, otherwise you have money to spend, if yes, please send me money!!!I want to pay my school debt FAST!!
have a nice evening
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Brutus66
|
|
Virginia
Nov 2001
time: 05:24
|
|
Yes, Coracle, I can't argue with several of your points. They did rip us off in a few ways- the whole limited edition tin thing, putting off mp for an expansion, etc.
Personally I think computer games are very overpriced to begin with. You get a cd that's worth pennies, a pamphlet of a manual (so they can rip you on a "strategy guide") and an oversized box. You don't even get a jewel case for the cd anymore with most games- just a paper sleeve. And to top it all, pushing unfinished products out is getting to be the norm. And don't even get me started with how aggravating CD keys or checks are. One quick trip to Computer Gaming World and they are rendered useless- the only purpose they serve is to inconvenience.
My point in my post was that I think the game, after all the patching, as far as LAN and sp play is concerned, is a lot of fun. The patching should not have been necessary to an extent, but I understand that they would want to tweak some things in accordance with popular demand, so a couple patches I can overlook.
I am not entirely satisfied, and I don't think I ever could be unless I designed the game myself and was able to put in everything I think it needs and changed the rules, etc. to my liking.
Maybe when artificial intelligence is perfected, and computer players acted in a way that was truly logical and reasonable for world leaders...maybe when Civ XXIV is released we might get everything we want and achieve nirvana, but I can't wait that long.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002
time: 00:24
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Brutus66
My point in my post was that I think the game, after all the patching, as far as LAN and sp play is concerned, is a lot of fun. The patching should not have been necessary to an extent, but I understand that they would want to tweak some things in accordance with popular demand, so a couple patches I can overlook.
I am not entirely satisfied, and I don't think I ever could be unless I designed the game myself and was able to put in everything I think it needs and changed the rules, etc. to my liking.
Maybe when artificial intelligence is perfected, and computer players acted in a way that was truly logical and reasonable for world leaders...maybe when Civ XXIV is released we might get everything we want and achieve nirvana, but I can't wait that long. |
I agree.
Glad you like the game. It will never be perfect, but what is?
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24.
Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
03-12-2002 07:33
ACK!
It's true. I'll admit, on occasion I"ve turned a blind eye on some of the mistakes amde by Firaxis. I just couldn't admit that my most anticipated game wasn't perfect....far from, in fact 
I understand your frustrations, but for me I'm pleased with the XP. I can understand how MP people are frustrated though.
|