 |
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
Yeah, I was thinking on the upload feature. Would it be possible if we top one head, "current information" (again ), in where one member posts a few images like the screenshot, F11, power, F1 with some cryptic names. After that, uploading each turn the newest images with the same name should keep the post in the thread up to date, and if certain images don't change, the last one is still valid and displayed.
The only problem is that it's one step more to do for the players, or somebody should come forward and volunteer to upload these pictures each turn to his account. We can't really change the uploaders, or we have to edit the post each time.
It's not exactly a chronicle, but.... oh Alva? Feeling interested? 
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Soren Johnson Firaxis
|
|
Hunt Valley, MD
May 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
oh, while I'm at it, could you include me in these mailings as well... I'm beginning to have a hard time visualizing what you are talking about...
sjohnson (at) firaxis.com
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Soren Johnson Firaxis
|
|
Hunt Valley, MD
May 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Shiber
Soren, you can find the up-to-date screenshots in the GS common mailbox (see page 1 of this thread). Soon we shall switch to uploading and posting the shots in the forum. |
what were people posting their e-mails for?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Soren Johnson Firaxis
|
|
Hunt Valley, MD
May 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DeepO
We have a mailing list which we use, the gatheringstorm address is just as backup and for those not listed. At least at my side you're included, but Sir Ralph and Nathan should include you in their lists if you want to receive all turn screenies.
DeepO |
yeah, I'd like to get the screenshots if possible... thanks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Soren Johnson Firaxis
|
|
Hunt Valley, MD
May 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Theseus
Amy, my fiancee, says: "I bet you wo-ooould."
(she's from Alabama)
Soren, we've got a situation here.
Participation in GS vs. Firaxis vs. both.
We are pretty creative people, and (speaking for the team, unauthorized) can see our way toward a win-win-win situation.
Any ideas?
Everyone contribute, please. |
hey, it's up to you guys... my current interest simply stems from paying a little more attention to how your democratic process works as we are starting up one of your own. So it is mostly just a request of convenience. Believe me, we hold out little hope of outminmaxing you guys...
at any rate, if you are uncomfortable with me being here, it would seem like you would be more concerned about me reading this forum (which has more strategic-level content) than viewing screenshots (which have mostly game-specific content).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
Gathering Storm is not very democratic...we mostly just debate everything to hell and post polls to spice things up. I'm still not quite sure how decisions are made.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
In regard to how our team is governed, there seem to be four basic elements:
1) People who take the time to post (and push) proposals tend to set the agenda for what gets discussed.
2) We have discussions and votes on broad policy matters (e.g. how to balance REXing, military, and wonder building). Ideally, we seek a consensus that most people like or at least don't object to too strongly rather than having the majority simply steamroll over the minority.
3) I tend to run the day-to-day economic matters more or less myself, in accordance with the policies we've set. In theory, people are always welcome to suggest alternatives to the moves I post in the turn threads, but in practice, people generally seem content to let me do the dirty work. (Which is fine with me since I happen to like the economic aspect of the game.)
4) When an urgent decision is needed, it's generally made by a consensus (or a majority if no consensus can be reached) of whoever happens to be around when the decision needs to be made.
I'm not sure what a government major would think of such a system, but it seems to work fairly well for us. Granted, people who want to have influence in setting the agenda, rather than just in voting on the agenda once it's set, have to put forth the time and effort to present and argue their positions. But I view that far more as a strength than as a weakness because it helps ensure that a good bit of thought will go into major policy decisions.
Nathan
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
DeepO

|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
Re: e-mailing screenies, or posting them: I'd rather still receive them by e-mail. The bandwidth is not a problem, and I don't forget to save them if I receive them by mail. Also, if you are present, you always immediately know when a turn is played, and don't need to wait until the board gets updated.
Re: Soren: Of course he's still welcome here, I don't see any problems with him lurking in this forum. We should maybe look out that we don't discuss IDG strat in here, but why would we do that, we've got a separate forum for that.
And I like it very much that Firaxis as a team has joined the IDG; I doubt that they are going to put as much discussion in it as the apolyton team does, and even with superiour background knowledge, outminmaxing us (nice term, BTW!) is unlikely. Most importantly, Firaxis keeps in touch with the game, and is more directly involved in the problems or wishes of the MP community, so every help we can deliver will be gladly given.
DeepO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
Could I please get back on the list as well?
a underscore petryk at hotmail dot com
Thanks.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|