 |
|
spartak
|
|
Fez
You have to remember that the cold war was costing the Soviet Union something in the region of half of its GCP by the time it collapsed. Its hard to maintain an economic structure working under that strain. No-one disputes that Capitalism is abetter wealth creator than any other economic system but left in isolation a command lead economy can also work.
I vaguelly recall having this argument before so to save time and effort, I'll conceed the argument now but I do have a valid point.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Carver
|
 |
reprocessing plutonium, Yongbyon, NK
Jan 2002 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Fez
Uh huh, and can you still point to that example today? Is the Soviet Union alive today? From the way I see it, you just been debunked. Capitalism is the only system that works pal. Live with it.
|
Administration and poor budgeting were the SU's main problems in later years. Communism has never failed as an economic plan when applied appropriately. China, India, Iran, Cuba, and others, have all benefitted from central planning and government involvment in enterprise, to varying degrees.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
Shouldn't this be in the CivIII-PtW forum?
Well, then, we wouldn't get to hear Fez's wonderful arguing skills... 
-OT-
Capitalism and Communism, in my opinion, are evenly matched. When cold war pressure is put on them, communism might strain, which is why I only evenly matched the two. Completely isolated, Communism is better. Besides, the USSR was not completely truly "Communism". Do you know all the under-the-table swag the leaders were getting?!?
Eh, I'll guess we will have to wonder which is better, until we get the Great Alliance gov't form. 
-/OT-
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|