 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
Hearts of Iron! 
I've been playing it constantly these past couple days (in between finals). There were some problems with earlier patches. For instance, there were problems with the AI not building enough units, but have been fixed for the most part (hence, the Axis states being unusally powerful, and humans being able to beat any country fairly easily). And yes, there are still some problems; for instance if you're a neutral there doesn't seem to be any reaction if the player goes on a conquering spree against other neutrals, but it really isn't a problem as long as you role-play within historical parameters.
But the tactical AI is absolutely brilliant compared to EU II. As an example, I started a UK '36 campaign yesterday. A few months or so after the war started (in '40), I launched an invasion against Germany originally trying to secure a beach-head in the German coastal forts between Denmark and Holland. When I encountered less resistance than I expected, I pushed further inland, seeing if I could encircle some of the German forces on the other side of the Maginot line (most of their troops were in Poland at the time). But before I could make it to the Rhine, I got a little greedy and tried to destroy a couple panzer divisions travelling to the Western front. I was winning the battles, but Germany brought divisions West from the Polish front. Instead of simply reinforcing their losing armour, which I could've defeated as well, they cut off my armies' supplies and any hope of retreat. Then they reinforced their armies, and it was only a matter of time till my armies were destroyed. 
How easy is it? Well, on version 1.02 on very hard, it's definitely a challenge to play as one of the majors except perhaps the US, which is like France and Spain in EU combined, and to a much lesser extent the Soviet Union. England and Japan are very fun, IMO. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
Morrowind runs fine on a weaker processor and slower video card
good game
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I am playing Civ3, Arcanum, and Zangband ringht now
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Blisterz
|
|
Has anyone said Medieval Total war yet?
I got that game a few weeks ago and I must say it is one of the best strategy games I have played in a long time. Its a million times better then shogun as well.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
tinyp3nis
|
 |
compensate this!!
May 2002 time: 07:24
|
|
quote: Whoa! Morrowind is good but it's far from the greatest game ever. There are severe problems with the way the game is set up. |
I have to agree with this... and from certain point on the fun stops, atleast it stopped for me, and the game gets very repeative.
Also, the non linearity is too much from morrowind to take on, it does not work, not nearly as good as i.e Fallout series. Leveling up your character was not very fun either, the non linearity had part with this too. The idea of being able to go all places was kind of nice, but in the end it didn't work very well 
Mike is right, your character can specialize in something but does not have to, even the game does not encourage player to do it either, since you soon find out the best ways to deal with things are simple. Non tieves can open locked doors as easy as thieves with very little effort, and like Mike said warrior/mage fighting styles are not very balanced, there is no use using spells when it takes 5x less time to just beat them up.
quote: The lowest I get in 20 fps. I usually get 40-50 fps. | Would you tell me what machine you have, and also your settings (view distance, shadows and AI distance, maybe resolution too but in morrowind it has little effect on performance). Sure I get 50-100 indoors. Go to the Balmora slit rider and look at the city and tell me what you get in fps... There I get 13...
quote: There is not a single game close to as good it is. Fallout comes closest in the RPG department, but it falls very, very short. And I've played a LOT of games. | I have played many games too. Sorry to step on your toes but it's only fair people hear other opinions too, so they would consider twice buying morrowind. My and my friend certainly don't think it's a great game, he is not even going to finish it! He just said he is too bored with it and don't want to play it nomore.... btw he has also played many games.
I did like both fallouts, actually I think they were great and can't wait to get fallout 3 if they make it.
So there you have it, there are many people who like the game, but also people who don't like it. Actually 66% of the people I know IRL think it's OK (me and my cousin) and 33% of them regret buying (friend I was referring to). I think the guys who made morrowind earned my money, but imho it could have been much much better, and there are tons of better games. But Morrowind is a different game, not many like it now, that is its strong side...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: Ya once the USA entered the war that was true. But for awhile things were looking pretty up for the Axis. After Barbarossa started the Soviets were in a really desperate state and if not for some stupid moves by Hitler, Germany might have won on that front. |
But the point is, Germany were very lucky to be in that position. For instance, if the French beefed up their lines at the Ardennes, or if Red Army caught the Wehrmacht unprepared to fight a defensive war in '41, instead of the other way around, German forces certainly wouldn't have beat the USSR. What it comes down to is that the Germans were pretty damn lucky to get as far as they did, and even then, Soviet and American industry and manpower ultimately made their fight futile.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|