 |
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
Summing up my post......if an animal is VERY similar to a human, why is it okay to kill/harm/commit a horrible act to an animal-but one you would NEVER do to a human?
Is it because they aren’t intelligent, and thus don’t deserve the same protection human beings get?
There are plenty of higher level animals which are on the level of, or close to human intelligence......primates and Cetacean's
(whale + dolphins) are basically on the same level we are.......and many other mammals are close......anyone who has owned dogs or cats for much of their life will tell you they are FAR from unintelligent.....
Dolphins have much larger, and even more organized brains then humans do......you COULD say they are more intelligent, though they haven’t had the luck to discover tool use, or the advantage of an education......look at a 15 year old human who has never been taught anything, and a 15 year old dolphin and tell me who displays more intelligence....
So, intelligence isn’t the issue?
Ah, its must be because were humans, and their animals, right?
Well what is a "human"? Someone who is born a vegetable, or becomes one is still considered human and given the protection that normal humans receive. Phenotype variants(Siamese twins) and genotype mutants(people with 6 fingers...downe syndrome....plenty of examples) are still considered human.
Ah, so its not the "body" then, its the DNA right?
Any student of science will tell you that we shair more then 97% of our DNA with primates.......and DNA between people can vary 3-7%….
Humans have emotions which animals do not?
Wrong again........higher level mammals have the same emotions we do...
Only humans use tools!
Wrong......primates use tools, dolphins have been known to use tools, otters use tools......
Humans have a soul-animals don’t!
You cant prove this any more then you can prove that humans have a soul....unless you can prove your opinion with facts, it has no merit, and thus it is despotic to force it upon others.
I know this comes off as VERY aggressive, and probably somewhat arrogant, but will someone PLEASE prove to me why higher levels mammals, or other sentient animals shouldn’t receive the same protection that humans do?
Im pissed off because someone I cannot disagree with if I value my job....she went on in great detail how it is fine to exploit monkeys etc........venting here.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JCG
|
 |
between a rock and a hard place
Feb 2002 time: 00:24
|
|
Obviously rats, mosquitoes, et al can transmit serious disease, thus surely they do not deserve anything.
On the other hand, as far as "higher level mammals", you're kinda right as far as the theory goes....Still, I believe we should "follow" the example of most other species and take care of our own mess first and foremost.
Btw, as far as I know (and I could be wrong), only humans have self-consciousness, opinions, the liberty to think in abstract terms, and the ability of acting in ways not related whatsoever to our own survival (which is most of what we do each day in our free time).
Any other animal can do all that?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
I am against cruelty to animals , because it stains the soul of the human that does that, for cruelty's sake.
But experiments are fine with me.
except dogs. Dogs ARE men's best friends, and betraying the firm bond that humanity has formed for them is wrong. |
I agree with Azazel. Actually I agree so often with Azazel I'm making him my spokesman on all issues.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dissident
because we are hungry and that is the way nature works. |
Nature is an INCREDIBLY weak word, be specific.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
My coworker insists it has been demonstrated that pigs have the same intelligence of a human 3 year old. I think she's high, but that's the argument.
Cruelty to any living thing for cruelty's sake is wrong, indeed. |
They are heh, pigs are actually really smart.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Kill them painlesly, process, pick off supermarket and eat.
Dolphins are not tasty so there is no problem.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
no i havent eaten any but i rely on the tastes of my ancestors
if they were tasty we would eat them
i'm sure someone took a bite sometime down the line
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp
"Nature" isn't a weak word where I come from.... |
There is no such thing as "natural"....nature is relative.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
"Oh, yeah, sure, keep the cute furry animals:
-What are you?
-I'm an Otter.
-What do you do?
-I swim around on my back and do cute human things with my hands.
-You're free to go.
-What are you?
-I'm a cow.
-Get on the truck.
-I'm an animal, I have rights!
-You're a baseball glove, now get on the ****ing truck with your brother!"
-Dennis Leary
But seriously folks...
We eat animals. We're omnivors.
I agree that to the extent we can still eat the things we want to eat w/o being uncessarily cruel to the animals, we should do that.
I support medical experimentation because, as distasteful as it may be, it helps save human lives in the future, and that's our primary goal, isn't it? The survival of the species? It's sure as hell the other species' goal.
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|