 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
Les Miserables - V. Hugo
The Illiad - Homer
Great Expectations - C. Dickens
War and Peace - L. Tolstoy
EDIT: All Quiet on the Western Front - E. Remarque
Crime and Punishment - F. Dostoyevski
1984 - G. Orwell
The Great Gatsby - F. Scott Fitzgerald
A Farewell to Arms - E. Hemmingway
The Lord of the Rings - J.R.R. Tolkien
Those are my favorites among the great works, anyway.
Last edited by Boris Godunov on 21-12-2002 at 00:14
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
quote: Originally posted by alva
Didn't understand a flippin' word of it( needed a dictionairy, even to read it in dutch, closed it after about 10 pages :
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrhhhhhhhh 
This one put me of reading for 6 months,( picked it up again by reading Wilt(Sharpe) ), I did finish it though. |
I loved Gravity's Rainbow, although it was anything but an easy read. I had a dictionary with me for the first two parts of the book (by that time I had learned the lingo) and it took me close to a year to finish. It is so densely written and it was like reading four books in one. Afterwards, I felt like a taken way too much acid.
The hardest thing about the book, I think, is finding Pynchon's rhythm. Some of his sentences go on for a page or more and I think that really throws some people. I didn't find the rhythm of the book until I got to part two. Overall the book was orgainized like a piece of classical music in four massive movements. (Tangent alert: another book that was written like a piece of classical music is A Clockwork Orange, Anthony Burgess.)
One of the best things about Gravity's Rainbow is that it has left a nice aftertaste in my mind for many years.
I loved The Trial. The endless frustrations of the main character deeply resonated with me and still do.
How good was Journey to the End of the Night? I started to read it a few years ago, but I put it down for some reason. Is it worth picking back up?
* * *
Boris:
You actually read Ulysses cover to cover? I got to the part where he started the stream of consciousness rant about the modality of the visible vs. the immodality of the visible and then the modality of the audible vs. the immodality of the audible. At that point I literally threw the book across the room. It was a little too erudite and seemed to be an exercise in academic mental masturbation.
If I'm wrong, please enlighten me and I will try to read it again.
* * *
Kropotkin:
Please, tell me a little about Steppenwolf. A friend of mine gave it to me years ago and I never read it. I still have it laying around here someplace. Is it really that good? I have the impression it was more of a young man's book, akin to Catcher in the Rye.
* * *
My favorite children's books are: Alice and Wonderland and The Chronicles of Narnia.
Did anyone ever read Thomas Tryon? I absolutely loved "The Other" and "Harvest Home". The Other was another book that I read multiple times as I loved the American Gothic (caps?) atomosphere.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
El León
|
 |
Wisconsin
Sep 2002 time: 23:24
|
|
Can we distinguish novels and literature, please?
Douglas Adams is just about the one of the best novelists I've read... But literature?
Only Wernazumatzin mentioned Homer? 
I guess it will be hopeless to nominate the Bhagavad-Gita, or Jalal Al Din Rumi (I guess poetry is not literature, by the looks of it, which also leaves R.M. Rilke out). Or Cien Años de Soledad. No Dante Alighieri either. No Ovid Metamorphoses, no Aesop fables, (Brecht Threepeny Opera? Ibsen Doll House? Chekhov The Cherry Tree?)
Not to mention Bocaccio Decameron, Stendhal Stories, Pedro Antonio de Alarcón El Sombreo de Tres Picos, Jorge Manrique Coplas a la muerte de mi padre (oops, sorry, no poetry), Maxim Gorki The Mother... oh well. Not too much out there, now is there?
EDIT - Sorry Boris, you also got Homer. Sartre Le Nausee, before I forget. Virginia Woolf The Waves (yep, women can write, too, Mary Shelley Frankenstein)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
10 top books i've read and i remember now(with some spelling errours probably since i translate)
Homer's Odyssey
Homer's Illiad
Hesse's Sidarta
Mourselas' Vamena Kokina Malia
Triantafylopoulou's Savato vradi stin akri tis polis
Dostoyefski's White Nights
Kafka's Metamorphosis
Kazantzakis' Erga kai politeia tou Alexi Zorba
Bizentsos' Erotokritos
Eco's Name of the rose
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by El Leon
Can we distinguish novels and literature, please?
Douglas Adams is just about the one of the best novelists I've read... But literature?
Only Wernazumatzin mentioned Homer? 
I guess it will be hopeless to nominate the Bhagavad-Gita, or Jalal Al Din Rumi (I guess poetry is not literature, by the looks of it, which also leaves R.M. Rilke out). Or Cien Años de Soledad. No Dante Alighieri either. No Ovid Metamorphoses, no Aesop fables, (Brecht Threepeny Opera? Ibsen Doll House? Chekhov The Cherry Tree?)
Not to mention Bocaccio Decameron, Stendhal Stories, Pedro Antonio de Alarcón El Sombreo de Tres Picos, Jorge Manrique Coplas a la muerte de mi padre (oops, sorry, no poetry), Maxim Gorki The Mother... oh well. Not too much out there, now is there?
EDIT - Sorry Boris, you also got Homer. Sartre Le Nausee, before I forget. Virginia Woolf The Waves (yep, women can write, too, Mary Shelley Frankenstein) |
Damn it El Leon! Don't you know that such a list is far too elitist, and how many peole here have actually read all of Dante, or Marquez, or somehting like the decameron! Stick to works form the last 100 years man!
And what of the great Nordic sagas, or the tale of Gilgamesh?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
monolith94
|
 |
New England
Jan 1970 time: 00:24
|
|
"Can we distinguish novels and literature, please?"
No, we can't. Or at least, I can't. I feel that when approaching things from a scholarly mindset, you can't let your guard down one bit!
And stop ragging on Adams! Admittedly his first book wasn't as deep as the others, but consider the circumstances of the other books: a cow pressuring you to eat him, a ruler of the universe who is so out of contact it is ridiculous, an alien race bred in isolation that, when discovering the existence of others, immediately seeks to eliminate them? This is pure satire of an even higher form than, for example, Gulliver's Travels, as it is subtler and, in my opinion, more layered.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
quote: Originally posted by alva
{Gravity's Rainbow}
wasn't this the only book the guy wrote? Even published after he was dead?
|
No, he is still living and he is still writing as densely as ever.
He's a recluse and refuses all interviews, just like Salinger. The big difference is that Pynchon still writes. I think the reason he has written so few books, is that the BIG books (V, GR, M&D) are massively researched. There is a GR companion if you are interested in seeing just how much research was involved. Obviously you don't have to go that deep to enjoy the book as it hits you on many levels, but if you wanted to, it is nice to know you could.
Thomas Pynchon:
V: 1963
The Crying of Lot 49: 1966
Gravity's Rainbow: 1973
Slow Learner: collection of short stories: 1984
Vineland: 1990
Mason & Dixon: 1997 - I still haven't finished this one. I think I'm all Pynchoned out.
The following is good for a laugh.
http://phc.mpr.org/performances/19980606/cowboys.htm
excerpt from "A Prairie Home Companion"
They strung him up, and shot him, and were about to give him poison,
And then one cowboy rose up in his saddle and cried, "Boys, in
All my days on lynch mobs, there was one sure way of lynchin'
That's to lock him in the outhouse with the works of Thomas Pynchon.
So they put the Amarillo Kid in the little house out back
With the works of Thomas Pynchon, a solid four-foot stack.
And he commenced to read The Crying of Lot 49,
And he groaned so loud and mournfully, they knew that he was dyin.
He finally finished that one but on Gravity's Rainbow,
They could hear him sighing and his breath was coming slow.
When they opened up the door, he had passed to his rest,
He had died of suffocation for the book lay on his chest.
He could see the ladies singing, he could smell his long-lost friends,
And his spirit went to Austin where the party never ends.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
Does anyone else here think Kafka was misunderstood? It seems most people find him depressing. I always thought his works were humorous.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
quote: Originally posted by El Leon
Can we distinguish novels and literature, please?
Douglas Adams is just about the one of the best novelists I've read... But literature?
Only Wernazumatzin mentioned Homer? 
I guess it will be hopeless to nominate the Bhagavad-Gita, or Jalal Al Din Rumi (I guess poetry is not literature, by the looks of it, which also leaves R.M. Rilke out). Or Cien Años de Soledad. No Dante Alighieri either. No Ovid Metamorphoses, no Aesop fables, (Brecht Threepeny Opera? Ibsen Doll House? Chekhov The Cherry Tree?)
Not to mention Bocaccio Decameron, Stendhal Stories, Pedro Antonio de Alarcón El Sombreo de Tres Picos, Jorge Manrique Coplas a la muerte de mi padre (oops, sorry, no poetry), Maxim Gorki The Mother... oh well. Not too much out there, now is there?
EDIT - Sorry Boris, you also got Homer. Sartre Le Nausee, before I forget. Virginia Woolf The Waves (yep, women can write, too, Mary Shelley Frankenstein) |
Are you Camille Paglia?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
El León
|
 |
Wisconsin
Sep 2002 time: 23:24
|
|
quote: Damn it El Leon! Don't you know that such a list is far too elitist, and how many peole here have actually read all of Dante, or Marquez, or somehting like the decameron! Stick to works form the last 100 years man! |
Elitist? Or inclusive? I'm not saying every work of García Márquez, but you'd have a tough time getting out of high school in Latin America without having read him. That's alot of people right there.
Or the Gita. Millions of people in India will quote it to you, I bet.
I was also shocked that no one had mentioned Dante - whereas Cervantes was mentioned. I don't think they are elitist, in fact I don't find anyone on the list as hard to read as (with the exception of Sartre and Woolf), say, Pynchon, Joyce, Gaddis, Kafka, and many others from the last 100 years, some of whom have been mentioned. The silmarillion is much harder than most of the works I mentioned.
BTW who is Camille Paglia? Yo soy El León.
And in the end, if you say literature, I asume it is related to "letters," and yes, I would say it is hard then to find people in the last 100 years who have influenced letters. But Adams, Tolkien, Gaddis, are some of my favorite authors. In fact, some of them are even starting to be influential.
Not to mention Joyce's impact on English letters...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|