 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tribune
|
 |
Vienna, Austria
Nov 1999 time: 06:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DrSpike
Yeah I got the faint impression you liked it. |
quote:
Say, have you played the other games people mentioned at the start, such as Close Combat and Combat Mission. I really like the latter. |
Combat Mission, yes. Possibly the best tactical sim, ever. I happen to prefer Grand Strategy/Political, but as a game, CM deserves 5 Stars, definitely.
TOAW was also mentioned, I think the problem with TOAW is it has too much micro-management. Itīs interesting, but, unlike 3rd Reich, itīs not elegant. One reason why I like 3rd Reich so much is the 3-month-turns, and low unit density. Itīs not micro-management hell at all, but itīs not beer-and-pretzel, either. Rather, it compresses everything important into minimum space, like a zip file. 3rd Reich should be compulsive study for game designers.
Clash of Steel had some promise, but in the final analysis its weaknesses were greater than its strengths. For example, if you concentrated on Strategic Bombers and bombing the Oil Supply, you could totally immobilize the entire German Wehrmacht, including the Infantry. In contrast again, with 3rd Reich design a lot of thought went into keeping players from abusing the system.
There are two new games available: Strategic Command and HoI. I didnīt buy either, SC is really over-simplistic and has some issues, such as using Subs against Capital Ships instead of Merchants, which is simply wrong. My impression is that SC is Axis&Allies with worse graphics.
HoI is another story; I might get tempted, even though I think itīs not a good idea. Europa Universalis and WWII donīt mix. Also, there are probably a lot of paradox bugs , and Iīve heard Japan and Russia always go to war against each other. (Ahistorical events should be possible, but they shouldnīt happen all the time. As it is, itīs not possible to fight WWII without a major front in Siberia. ) All that said, Paradox Games are always interesting (even if sometimes in a weird way ), so I may yet buy HoI, despite my objections.
Ceterum censeo: As good, realistic WWII Grand Strategy games go, 3rd Reich is as yet the only contender. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
it is from a board game by avalonhill
I have 1.3 first edition copies
I have thought about getting a 4th edition copy (I havbe heard it is much better)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
downloaded
can't figure out how to insall right
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tribune
|
 |
Vienna, Austria
Nov 1999 time: 06:24
|
|
2nd Impressions:
-Yes, itīs interesting.
-But itīs not quite as good as the EU series.
-The game is super-detailed (and very time-consuming!) in the Military/Tech sector.
-But itīs disappointing in the Diplomacy sector. Few Events, few things to do really. Donīt expect another EUII here.
-Graphics are ok, but nothing spectacular.
-Music is great.
-Manual seems ok at first glance, but is inaccurate. There are important options in the manual, that are not in the game (Trade Pacts!) Otoh, some things that ARE in the game are not explained in the manual.
-Intro is ok, but shortish, and again not QUITE as good as EUīs.
-Expect to be drawn in by the atmosphere.
-But also expect the game to be extremely time-consuming.
-As a Major Power, there is too much you HAVE to do.
-As a Minor Power, there is too little you CAN do.
-In the final analysis, this game is VERY much a question of personal taste. My verdict:
Somewhere between 5 to 9/10. 
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|