 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
reismark
|
 |
Paragon of Virtue
Jan 1970 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Lucky, lucky Giants. Akers should have made that chip shot FG, and Giants would have been going home.
That's ok... they still get a bye, and Green Bay will win on Monday Night to get Home Field. |
The fact is, Imran, the Giants should have had the game put away long before it came down to that. They had two touchdowns wiped out by utter bullshit holding calls by the officials, and another by Kerry Collins' dumb decision after a 90+ yard drive. And even if the Giants had lost, New Orleans still would have had to win to send them home, which ain't no guarantee, since Brooks is hurting and the Carolina D is tough.
And Green Bay plays tomorrow afternoon, not Monday night, on the road (where they're beatable) in the same stadium that just saw the Giants get a well-deserved win and Shockey back up his Pro Bowl berth BIG TIME, against a Jets team that will not only be much more desperate for a win than them but are also far healthier. It's not a cakewalk by any means.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
SnowFire
|
 |
New York City, NY
Jan 1970 time: 00:24
|
|
Haven't really followed football much, but I did watch the Eagles-Giants game. What a weird, weird game. I will say that if the Giants were lucky, so were the Eagles at times; and for Reismark, "shouldn't have been that close?" You're arguing that turnovers shouldn't ruin your day? It was quite a close game in spirit as well as number.
I can't comment on the Holding calls (it looks to me like they should be being called on half the plays, so I'm useless as an observer- it always looks like a penalty), but the interception by the Giants in OT was quite a questionable call. On the instant replay, it sure looked to me like the defender flagrantly grabbed the reciever's face mask, which should have been 15 yards right there since you can kill people that way. Then again, maybe his hand just got in front of the mask at the angle that the camera was at... oh well.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord_Davinator
|
|
Kathmandu
Nov 2000 time: 10:54
|
|
why the hell is it called football?
geez man... you use your foot on the ball for like 2 times in a game
|
|
|  |
 |
|
reismark
|
 |
Paragon of Virtue
Jan 1970 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
The Jets aren't going to be more desperate for a win, because even if they win, they might not go! The Packers realize that they NEED to win in order to have any chance of going to the Superbowl. And while the Jets have Pennington... he's no Farve, and game time temp? I bet it will be under 40... and you know Farve's record in games under 40 degrees right? |
Imran, the Jets' chances are all dependent on two games which will have already taken place by the time they step on the field. If New England beats Miami, then the Jets are in a "win and you're in" situation - they'd take the AFC East with a win over the Packers. If Miami wins, then you look to the Cleveland/Atlanta game. If Atlanta wins that game, then the Jets will get a wild card with a win. If Cleveland wins, the Jets are eliminated before they're even on the field. If it gets to that, then yes, Green Bay will win, but I think New England & Atlanta will get the job done to give the Jets their in and their motivation. Bottom line is, the Jets will know their fate by kickoff - and in three of the four situations, the Jets will lock up a playoff berth if they win.
CORRECTION: In the case of a wild card, either Denver has to win or Kansas City has to lose. But I think the Patriots win anyway. 
BTW, Weather.com says temperature in East Rutherford one hour before kickoff will be 41 degrees. But that doesn't matter - the Jets have proven they can win big games in cold weather.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|