 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
a. not correct.
b. an highly immoral law. |
If you are found guilty of a crime, you are guilty, whether or not you committed the crime. I know, it's circular logic, but that's what we have to deal with. Once you are convicted, you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you could not have committed the crime in order to get the conviction overturned (unless there were serious legal errors).
And yes, it was a terribly immoral law, but from their point of vew they were trying to save these people's souls. We know its bs, but they fervently believed they were doing right not only by the community but also by the condemned.
quote: I've already said that the DP is used to often in the states. My point was totally different: an otherwise moral law COULD become immoral if the amount of people that are against it would be very large, and their resistance to that law very strong. |
That gets into a debat over the nature of morality. Either morality is fixed, as objectivists would argue or it is fluid and changes with society, as we Marxists would argue. I might find the burning of witches and the Death Penalty in general reprehensable, but within their contexts, they are/were moral acts.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:24
|
|
quote:
That gets into a debat over the nature of morality. Either morality is fixed, as objectivists would argue or it is fluid and changes with society, as we Marxists would argue. I might find the burning of witches and the Death Penalty in general reprehensable, but within their contexts, they are/were moral acts.
|
CONSIDERED moral, and WERE moral are two different things.
My argument is that the same act could be moral under different sircumstances, but the reason for the morality or the immorality of the same act would remain the same, because the effects of the same act under different sircumstance would vary greatly. However, I fail to see the utility of witch-burning under any sircumstances. If you have a good example, please, enlighten me. 
and about he DP issue: I admit I don't know all of the sides to it in the US. But since I only brought it as an example, It really doesn't mean anything.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
CONSIDERED moral, and WERE moral are two different things.
My argument is that the same act could be moral under different sircumstances, but the reason for the morality or the immorality of the same act would remain the same, because the effects of the same act under different sircumstance would vary greatly. However, I fail to see the utility of witch-burning under any sircumstances. If you have a good example, please, enlighten me. 
and about he DP issue: I admit I don't know all of the sides to it in the US. But since I only brought it as an example, It really doesn't mean anything. |
An act is moral if it remains justified when made universal. However, this does mean morality may be context sensitive.
For example, making love to a woman may be moral or immoral depending upon her level of consent or her marital status.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|