 |
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: We are attacking Iraq because if they get nukes, they can do whatever they please in the ME. Take over Kuwait again? Sure... they have nukes. |
What about Iran? Or Libya? Egypt? What about North Korea? South Africa? In fact, North Korea has recently announced..... 
quote: We weren't funding terrorists. We were funding and training guerilla fighters, some of whom later became terrrorists. |
If your going to play on words, then the suicide bombers are also "GUERILLA FIGHTERS". Technically that is. So I suppose you are correct....and remember, Al Qaeda isn't a TERRORIST organization, it is a GUERILLA organization 
[QUOTE} . There is evidence is Iraq is trying to get nukes, and if it does they will be able to run rampant and undermine our power. Having a hostile power with nukes nessecarily undermines your power in a region. Not paranoia, smart foreign policy. [/QUOTE]
Where is this evidence? I surely haven't seen me...It may have slipped me by. Could you please point me to the evidence?
Also, if your goinng to attack Iraq on the basis that "If they get nukes (and theyre trying to!) then our power will decline!)", well, North Korea....We have the proof, and most experts are saying theyre just a "tad" bit closer than Iraq to actually GETTING those nukes. Also rememeber that its projected that once North Korea has it, they can hit Seoul (The capital of South Korea), Tokyo (The capital of Japan), Alaska, and the entire West Coast (Although thats being debated...). And its projected that they'll soon be able to hit the entire continental United States by the end of the year. Iraq does not even have that power. So instead of worrying about how much power we can project in the ME or Korean Penninsula (sp), we should be worrying about matters a tad closer to home.
quote: BY the way Tassadar, get those posts back yet? |
Not yet 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Shi Huangdi
|
 |
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999 time: 00:24
|
|
"If your going to play on words, then the suicide bombers are also "GUERILLA FIGHTERS". Technically that is. So I suppose you are correct....and remember, Al Qaeda isn't a TERRORIST organization, it is a GUERILLA organization "
The Mujaheddin wasn't using terror tactics, at least not that i know of. But whatever the case is their main method of fighting was guerilla warfare against Soviet forces.
"Where is this evidence? I surely haven't seen me...It may have slipped me by. Could you please point me to the evidence?"
It's been pointed in other threads here already they have been trying to acquire nukes. Feel free to search for the thread if you like.
"well, North Korea....We have the proof, and most experts are saying theyre just a "tad" bit closer than Iraq to actually GETTING those nukes. Also rememeber that its projected that once North Korea has it, they can hit Seoul (The capital of South Korea), Tokyo (The capital of Japan), Alaska, and the entire West Coast (Although thats being debated...). And its projected that they'll soon be able to hit the entire continental United States by the end of the year. Iraq does not even have that power. So instead of worrying about how much power we can project in the ME or Korean Penninsula (sp), we should be worrying about matters a tad closer to home. "
I don't think it's too likely NK is just going to nuke the United States. The fact of the matter is NK jusn't hasn't been agressive lately, it's only act of agression was the Koreasn war and that was after being given the OK by Stalin. Iraq on the other hand has been rather agressive lately, attacking Iran, Kuwait, and threatening to attack Israel. I think for the most part Russia and China will be able to keep a leash on NK.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
Attacking civilians makes one a terrorist. Attacking the Russian army, on the other hand, is fully justified. They knew the risks before invading another country. |
Oh really?
Then explain to me please how in the hell a camel loaded with bags full of explosives and left on MARKET square could be attack vs. army? You know, only crazy would call market a military target.
Or perhaps you could explain to silly Russian, why those guys made bombs inside of various things- photo cameras, pack of sigaretes, etc and quite often inside childish TOYS and thrown them everywhere and when someone piked them up...boom. This isn't a terrorism right?
Just to make you fell a bit better, I'll change one word in your claim.
quote: Attacking the Russian army, on the other hand, is fully justified. They knew the risks before invading another country. |
It should be:
Attacking the US army, on the other hand, is fully justified. They knew the risks before invading another country.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|