 |
|
Alex Woehr
|
|
Greenville, SC
May 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
For a war I think the Mongol Horde probably takes the cake. From 1211-1241 Gengis Khan and his son with their comparatively small army took over China, the Turks, Russia and much of eastern Europe, all having armies more numerous and more advanced than their attackers.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Alex Woehr
For a war I think the Mongol Horde probably takes the cake. From 1211-1241 Gengis Khan and his son with their comparatively small army took over China, the Turks, Russia and much of eastern Europe, all having armies more numerous and more advanced than their attackers. |
I think you have a top ten there but you can in no way say that the Mongol army was backward. Gengis developed a military that was eons ahead of its time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Considering Israel outnumbered its enemies, had more weapons, a unified command structure, it was rather surprising they didn't take the whole thing.
|
Nonesense. Israel was able to muster up about 45k troops, and of that, only 15,000 went into field combat while the other 30,000 were defending local positions. The arabs states combined had armies totaling 80,000.
The US had embargoed the whole region, while Britain had embargoed Israel, while supplying the Arab states. Israel had to make do with less than 20,000 light arms that had been smuggled in. Israel had no tanks, no artillery, and 11 obsolete planes. They finally managed to procure weapons from, ironically, checkoslovakia a months after the fighting had started. The arab armies, in contrast, were very well armed.
As for command structure, while the arabs have never been ones to model one's command structure after, there was numerous infighting, suspicion and dissent between the Jewish groups which climaxed when, after the Irgun refused to join the IDF, Ben Gurion attacked an Irgun ship that bringing in arms - resulting in a number of deaths. Add to that vulnerable communication lines and that the arab forces had an overwhelming geographical advantage.
And for an army that was so much larger, better armed and more unified, why did the Israelis have such a high number of casualties?
quote: US state department records from before the war predict a total Israeli victory. |
Source?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
This was during the conquest of Gaul, correct? Didn't the Romans consider Gaul to be unconquerable at one point? |
In fact, the Gauls conquered Rome a few centuries before.
After Ceasar had been in Gaul for nearly ten years, the Gauls finally got their act together and united under one leader, Vercingetorix. They had significant early successes. But Caesar recovered and forced Vercingetorix to take a defensive stand at Alesia. Ceasar built fortifications around Alesia. When Vercingetorix sent for reinforcements. Caesar built defensive works in the other direction as well, facing out. When the Gauls attacked, they attacked from Alesia and from outside Alesia at the same time.
At one point in the line, the Romans were being overwhelmed. But Ceasar rushed reinforcements to the weakened area. The battle was, as I said, extremely close.
In the words of Maximus, aka, Russel Crowe, Roman Victor!
Last edited by Ned on 01-01-2003 at 23:21
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mattaba
|
|
Austerlitz, it was brilliant, Napoleon made is enemies do what he wanted.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Edan
Nonesense. |
Not gonna argue with you here because I don't want to turn this into an ME thread.
Simple facts: at no point did the Arabs ever outnumber the Israelis in Palestine, and by the end of the fighting, the Israelis outnumbers Arab forces in Palestine massively. Despite the arms embargo from the West, the Israelis got quite a bit of arms from the Soviet block, which was far more modern. At the begining it was a bit more iffy, since the Israelis only outnumbered the Arabs 25,000 to 23,000 and didn't have a lot of equipment. However, since they had a non-agression pact with the Jordanians (which they violated), they could concentrate their forces elsewhere.
That's my last word on this in this thread. I've writeen and rewritten this too many damn times in the alst two years to do it again for your personal benefit. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Odin
The Ottomans loosing the siege of Vienna, those Austrians were freaking lucky, and was the begining of the end of Ottoman dominance in eastern Europe. After than goofup the turks would never be as powerful again. |
The loss at the seige of Vienna was totally Kara Mustafa's fault. He neglected to fortify his camp and he refused to storm Vienna. If the city fell by seige, then all inside belonged to him, but if they stormed it, then the soldiers got to loot the city. Frankly, if he'd bothered to move to oppose the Germans and Poles, he could have held on, and then if they'd dug trenches around their camp (the size of the camp was bigger than the city of Vienna), put up some barricades, and had repositioned their troops and artillery to face the threat, things might have been very, very different.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote:
Simple facts: at no point did the Arabs ever outnumber the Israelis in Palestine, and by the end of the fighting, the Israelis outnumbers Arab forces in Palestine massively.
|
Source? (for that matter, you didn't cite your source of American documents, either, so I don't seriously expect a source)
quote: Despite the arms embargo from the West, the Israelis got quite a bit of arms from the Soviet block, which was far more modern.
|
Months after the fighting began. Before then, the Arab armies had armor, artillary and an air force where Israel had none by May 1948. ""the heaviest equipment of any consequence in the Israeli Forces was the 3-inch mortar, of which there were 195, while the "artillery" units had acquired some Hispano-Suiza 20 mm guns and some French 65mm howitzers without sights dating from the beginning of the century. A few Messerschmitt aircraft had been acquired, but were still abroad." _The Arab-Israeli Wars_
quote:
At the begining it was a bit more iffy, since the Israelis only outnumbered the Arabs 25,000 to 23,000 and didn't have a lot of equipment.
|
Again, source? They had armor, artillary and an air force, with 30,000+ well equipped troops and an additional 50,000+ palestinian irregulars in may of 1948. Egypt, Iraq and Syria had air forces, egypt and Syria had tanks, Jordan, Lebenon and Iraq had armored cars, and all had modern artillery.
quote:
However, since they had a non-agression pact with the Jordanians (which they violated), they could concentrate their forces elsewhere.
|
King abbdullah was put as commander in chief of both the invading Arab Legion, but also the forces already within palestine (indeed, the other arab legions suspected that he wanted to take over as much land as he could - and since he annexed the west bank, it appears to be with some merit.). And on May 14th, after several abortive attacks, they captured an Israeli Power station in Neharayim.
quote:
That's my last word on this in this thread. I've writeen and rewritten this too many damn times |
You've rewritten it enough times so that it has very little simmilarity with history. 
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|