 |
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
Yes, but having a common identity is not necessary to become a prosperous nation. Secondly with the US overseeing the whole place, that keeps those differences in check while things get on track.
It also took Japan many years to reach the stage they are at now. There was a time when "Made in Japan" meant you were buying utter crap. Now that label carries with it the highest quality in the world (tied with Germany).
Iraq also has one of the largest oil fields in the world sitting under it, and contrast that with Japan where there were absolutley no natural resources available. |
No, but having a common identity means internal stability. There are two big questions regarding this in terms of Iraq. First, will the US (or other western nations) commit the massive number of troops required and second, even with this, will the various factions really get along? Things are only relatively stable in Iraq right now because there is brutal supression of any dissenting opinions. Perhaps a better example would be the Balkans. NATO has a large presence in Kosovo and other areas, but while it may be preventing a massive civil war or genocide, it's hardly making things stable and/or bringing the different groups together.
As for the oil, that's about all Iraq has going for it. Further, what's going to happen with the money that it generates? Obviously, most of the production will be by foreign oil companies and what royalties it does generate need to be effectively channeled.
Going back to Japan, there was a history of taking western innovations and adapting them for Japanese society. Quite often these things were of inferior quality, but the inventiveness, desire for to industrialize, etc. were already prevelant in Japan (same deal with Germany). Japan simply had to catch up on the learning curve of quality. That curve isn't even in sight for Iraq, on top of all the other problems.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ted Striker
|
 |
United States of America
Jan 1970 time: 21:24
|
|
quote:
No, but having a common identity means internal stability. There are two big questions regarding this in terms of Iraq. First, will the US (or other western nations) commit the massive number of troops required and second, even with this, will the various factions really get along? Things are only relatively stable in Iraq right now because there is brutal supression of any dissenting opinions. Perhaps a better example would be the Balkans. NATO has a large presence in Kosovo and other areas, but while it may be preventing a massive civil war or genocide, it's hardly making things stable and/or bringing the different groups together.
|
It will definitley be interesting to see and that is the great question to be answered in the whole Iraq problem. My worry is that if someone assassinates Saddam, what is that going to do for stability?
quote:
Further, what's going to happen with the money that it generates? Obviously, most of the production will be by foreign oil companies and what royalties it does generate need to be effectively channeled.
|
Well, there is a pretty good example of this going on already, in the Northern US/UK protected area of Iraq, there is some prosperity there.
quote:
Going back to Japan, there was a history of taking western innovations and adapting them for Japanese society. Quite often these things were of inferior quality, but the inventiveness, desire for to industrialize, etc. were already prevelant in Japan (same deal with Germany). Japan simply had to catch up on the learning curve of quality. That curve isn't even in sight for Iraq, on top of all the other problems.
|
I'll meet you halfway on this one. The main man who is credited with introducing quality into the Japanese system is an American named Deming. There is an award given out every year in Japan called the Deming award and that goes to corporations and individuals who excel at quality.
I will disagree though that the Iraqi people lack the attributes that are necessary to turn their society into a great country.
Now they don't necessarily have to an industrial powerhouse to be measured as a success. Remember, this is the land of ancient Persia, one of the most civilized empires ever. It's also the land that has Baghdad, which at one time was arguably the most scholastically and culturally advanced city in the world.
So, I don't necessarily see Japan and Germany as proper role models for Iraq. I see them turning into something different, with a lifestyle that is unique in their own way.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|