 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:24
|
|
I know that changing from 70 to 80 or vice versa does the same for me. But since I cant notice the difference, I guess it's psychological.
When going down to 60 down, you can actually notice the screen "moving"(for lack of a better word).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
I thought the movies go at 25 fps? |
IIRC, movies generally go at ~24 fps (something like 23.97 or something), with NTSC going at ~30 fps and PAL going ~25fps
I usually set my monitors at 75 or 80 hz.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
at lower refresh rates the screen will "tremble".
however, make absolutely sure that your monitor supports the refresh rate you have set for it.
otherwise it might break down.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Wraith
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Aug 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
--"is this psychological or is there a real reason for it?"
A large number of people have that complaint, so there's probably a real reason for it It does vary by person and by conditions; flourescent lighting will make it worse. Personally, I never run below 75.
--"what to laptops typically run at?"
LCD monitors do not use a refresh rate per-se. Instead they have a delay time, the time it takes a pixel to light up or darken. However, this won't cause the same sort of problems the low refresh rate does, it'll just cause streaking in fast-moving graphics.
--"For comparison purposes, a movie runs at 48 frames per second"
48? I thought movies were 24.
--"Yeah, but isn't FPS a whole other thing than refresh rate?"
You're getting two different things mixed up. Refresh rate is how often the screen is redrawn. FPS as you are using it is how many full screens the video card can draw. FPS as it is being used above is basically equivalent to the refresh rate, namely how many times the image on the screen is redrawn.
Wraith
First snow, then silence
This thousand dollar screen
Dies so beautifully
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:24
|
|
"48? I thought movies were 24."
No. 24 unique pictures. But 48 actual frames on all modern projectors, including IMAX. The film contains two identical frames adjacent.
"I thought the movies go at 25 fps?"
OK, ignore the 24 v. 48 question for a moment. Even film shipped to PAL-land will contain 24 unique pictures. But the DVD pressing is adifferent matter. When a PAL DVD is pressed, it is first interleaved (making 48 fields), then pre-filtered so that you won't have wavy lines on interlaced TVs when displayed, then 2:2 pulldown is added which just repeats one frame/two fields per second to bringing it from 48 to 50 Hz.
For NTSC DVD, after interleaving and pre-filtering, when a DVD is played, the player adds 3:2 pulldown, meaning that one out of every five frames/two fields is just a repeat bringing it from 48 to 60 Hz.
Last edited by DanS on 02-01-2003 at 23:03
|
|
|  |
 |
|
optimus2861
|
|
Halifax, NS
Nov 2000 time: 01:24
|
|
My laptop (LCD) runs at 60 Hz, though I don't seem to notice it as badly as 60 Hz on a monitor. I run my home monitor at 85 Hz, and when it occasionally drops down to 60 (Civ3 does this for a moment when it starts up, don't know why), it does hurt my eyes.
I think I heard a techincal explanation for why this is, but I don't remember all the details any more. Something to do with your brain beginning to perceive the individual images as opposed to "melding" them into one "continuous" image, or something like that...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|