 |
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp
If you don't consider the widespread use of nerve gas on an unarmed civilian population as evil then I really don't give much concern for your moral standards because you're clearly mad. |
I haven't seen any evidence of that, and I don't consider anything 'evil'. Quite simply, I do not think we can judge what is evil or not, since it depends on the individuals moral code, thus I do not consider it a concept. I do not agree with Saddam, I do not like what he does, but I will never brand someone evil. All they are is a combination of their parent's genes and their experiences, most in early life. I don't see how you can hold someone accountable for that. You can hold him accountable for his actions, and can brand an action an 'evil' action at a pinch, but to brand a person evil. He can control his actions, he cannot control his personality.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lazarus and the Gimp
|
 |
Whale-raping abomination
Aug 2000 time: 05:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drogue
I haven't seen any evidence of that, and I don't consider anything 'evil'. Quite simply, I do not think we can judge what is evil or not, since it depends on the individuals moral code, thus I do not consider it a concept. I do not agree with Saddam, I do not like what he does, but I will never brand someone evil. All they are is a combination of their parent's genes and their experiences, most in early life. I don't see how you can hold someone accountable for that. You can hold him accountable for his actions, and can brand an action an 'evil' action at a pinch, but to brand a person evil. He can control his actions, he cannot control his personality. |
"We are what we do repeatedly"- Aristotle.
He's evil.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:24
|
|
Ok. I can understand where Aristotle is coming from, however I do not agree. I think we know many thing snow that Aristotle did not have access to then, and such even he may be of different opinion now. Anyway, feel free to believe that, but I shall never condemn anyone as being evil.
Last edited by Drogue on 08-01-2003 at 04:05
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drogue
Yes, I believe they should have stopped there. Indeed they tried. Haig I think to was (unless I've got the wrong) wanted us to be lenient on Germany, to keep it as a trading ally, and was against complete invasion and occupation. Sadly, it was not his decision though. However I don't think it was a massive failing that they did, like I don't think it was a massive failing that the UN did not stop at defending Kuwaitm, although I do feel it should not have been done. A difference between Germany and Iraq is that Germany was a threat to all fighting against her, whereas Iraq posed no threat to the USA or UK. I do understand why we went to Iraq, but I feel the UNs mandate only goes so far as defense. If Iraq had invaded the US, I would feel better about invading Iraq.
Germany tried to make peace with England? Not as far as I've read, if you have a source I would be interested. Moreover, we had alliances that we would enforce the neutrality of Belgium. I would have been in favour of stopping at Germany's borders, but even those were disputed at the time. WW1 I'm afraid I know little about so cannot really comment. |
Does the name Rudolph Hess mean anything to you?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
quote: Originally posted by David Floyd
In the latest thread about Iraq, I made the comment that if the US attacks Iraq, I hope that the US loses, or at least takes a massive military beating.
Obviously, I got jumped on because of that comment. I even got called a traitor (oh no, not THAT ).
But my question is, why is it OK for US soldiers to kill Iraqis, but not OK for Iraqis to kill US soldiers? Why is it OK to wish that the US conducts a bloodless (for the US) campaign, destroying the Iraqi military (and incidentally killing thousands), but not OK to wish that the US gets frustrated in its aggression, and takes several thousand (several tens of thousands, even) of casualties?
I just don't see the difference. Maybe someone can help me out here. |
I will never respond to your posts again, or read threads you start.......................I cannot imagine what could possibly fuel such stupidity.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:24
|
|
Respond to what? No one has actually addressed my initial question, that I have seen. The majority of the posts directed against me are simple attempts to justify a war on Iraq, which is not what I'm asking.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:24
|
|
quote: YOu know I always was fond of you until I found out that you were a two faced weasel! |
I have absolutely no clue what you're talking about, but then again I probably wouldn't remember anyway...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|