 |
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:24
|
|
I'm sure the king of friggin England had lots in 1776.
As regards the Turks, again, who cares if they blow a cork on this, the US is the only game in town when it comes to holding the Russians back. Who do you think they'll turn to, the Germans? French? Any of their EU buddies? Hell these paper tigers couldn't even defend themselves these days.
Btw, at no point did I suggest attacking Turkey. The Kurds can figure out how to get their minority free, not our business unless the Turks start training terrorists. Now Iran is another story. We free the Kurds and go looking for volunteers to help us free the Kurds in Iran. Train up a couple of divisions, give em basic weapons and they become the ground force that follows the air assault into Kurdish areas in Iran.
No, we free the Kurds in northern Iraq and then let a free people vote on their own fate. If they want to be part of a new Iraq it will come out in the wash. If they want to be free, they have a couple divisions that we trained for the Iran fighting. They can look after themselves.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ranskaldan
|
 |
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lancer
I'm sure the king of friggin England had lots in 1776.
As regards the Turks, again, who cares if they blow a cork on this, the US is the only game in town when it comes to holding the Russians back. Who do you think they'll turn to, the Germans? French? Any of their EU buddies? Hell these paper tigers couldn't even defend themselves these days.
Btw, at no point did I suggest attacking Turkey. The Kurds can figure out how to get their minority free, not our business unless the Turks start training terrorists. Now Iran is another story. We free the Kurds and go looking for volunteers to help us free the Kurds in Iran. Train up a couple of divisions, give em basic weapons and they become the ground force that follows the air assault into Kurdish areas in Iran.
No, we free the Kurds in northern Iraq and then let a free people vote on their own fate. If they want to be part of a new Iraq it will come out in the wash. If they want to be free, they have a couple divisions that we trained for the Iran fighting. They can look after themselves. |
Neat and idealistic, but it won't work.
Establishing an independent Kurdistan in northern Iraq would cause Turkey to panic. But if carving up an Arab, Muslim country isn't enough, you're suggesting a subsequent invasion of Iran, to carve them up. Consider that America is trying to GET the support of Muslim countries. That's the first and last way America can actually have a say in what happens in the Middle East.
In the meantime, Turkey would clamp down on Kurdish movements in Turkey, while whichever warlords who appear after Saddam falls in Iraq would swarm into the volatile region, looking for booty. In 10 years, you'd have Iraqis, Iranians, Turks, Kurds, various other foreign expeditions, far-leftists and far-rightists bashing each other in "Free Kurdistan". It'll kinda be like Bosnia plus Palestine plus post-Soviet Afghanistan, times ten. Such a failed region will also be the prime choice for Al-Qaeda's next hideout and headquarters.
In the meantime, the Kurdish children born in the next 10 years can expect live (and fight wars) in a region where infrastructure doesn't exist, politics is mainly AK-47's, and economy is a dream.
Great "freedom" for Kurdistan, I'd say.
Keep the current status-quo: an autonomous Kurdish region in Iraq, increased pressure on Turkey, before and after its introduction through the doors of EU. The Kurds will be able to build their homeland into paradise.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
I think the opinion that Kurds will go on fighting ad infinitum is a bit biased to the fact that they are not being given their freedom because of purely geostrategic reasons.
A semi free kurdistan is established in N. Iraq and is doing just fine under the supervision of the international community.
As for Turkey crossing the doors of the EU, sorry but you can forget about that (talking realisticly here).
But there WILL be pressure for Turkey to become more democratic which will help the Kurds.
After 40% of your population is another ethnicity you give them rights or hell breaks lose (again).
Also I weouldnt be so quick to reward regimes that support me but be more inclined to support the people themselves. (if it does not destroy me).
I think it pays more in the long run.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
well rask I disagree.
The US supports regimes which opress people. People dont hate these regimes so much as they hate the US.
And it will blow up when democracy is installed in these countries.
Prime example of that is S. Korea. The antimericanism there is so strong now it is something the PM has to take under serious consideration when policy making.
The US support for brutal regims have mae S. Koreans more anti-american than the N. Koreans will ever be.
The only thing that still allows some relation with the US is mutual fear by both from eachother.
Also I think it is a bit naive to think that once US or west supported brutal regimes go away, chaos will result.
With the proper attention from the int. community and NO funny games of real politik being forced on them, you'd be surprised how many peope just want
peace.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
not to mention the obvious.
that when under a brutal regime people will radicalize.
into ugly things.
like islamic extremists for example.
so are you fighting the water that comes from the river (and not blocking its source?)
i think so. although i understand full well the real politik implications. but its a choice one makes. and pays.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
I think that rask allured to the opinion that once a kurdish state is formed there will be intrafighting.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ranskaldan
|
 |
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001 time: 00:24
|
|
Yeah... and look what happened to the Balkans.... or Israel/Palestine.
2000 years of flipping Alsace-Lorraine from France to Germany and back didn't solve the problem. Making everyone sit down, be quiet, and work together did. Today no one cares who Alsace-Lorraine belongs to anymore, not because it now belongs to the *right* side (Alsace speaks German so it obviously doesn't), but because the borders are open and the nations are developed.
And as for the dispute about exactly what I said, I mean all parties: internal Kurdish factions, factions of Arab/Turk/Persian minorities in Kurdistan, pockets of foreign factions from Iran and Iraq, and throw in other factions too, the kind that we find in Bosnia and Afghanistan with long names containing some combination of "Freedom", "Democratic", "Islamic", "Liberal", "National", and "Army".
I wouldn't consider that freedom, not really.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|