 |
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
This is an unfinished theme that I have been exploring recently. Any thoughts or criticisms are welcome as I would like to pursue this idea further. Please remember this is in the raw.
What is more important than the Nation?
Why is the Nation more important than the individual? What is greater than Nation? Is the sanctity of the Nation supreme?
The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. When is this not true? The individual is of prime importance. Would you like to be the symbolic sacrifice for the survivors?
Our myths are dominated by the heroic individual. He is heroic for two reasons, because he is born to win or he is born to die. There can be no middle ground for the hero. The Nation is supreme, but the mythical hero sustains its counterfeit soul. I say counterfeit, because the Nation squashes its individuals. It is precisely because of this reason that it is impossible to have heroes in a Nation. A Nation by definition has no individuals. It is a colony beast. It is a multi-celluar creature in which the individual cells have gained consciousness.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
In its current state, the Nation generates a certain number of elite individuals who act on the behalf or for the entertainment of the masses or the hoarde depending on your view. These individuals are more equal than others, to steal a line from Orwell.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:24
|
|
I am one of those people who couldn't care less about "the Nation". I'd consider myself European but that's about it, in football I'll support Holland and that's as far as it goes.
I am more important to myself than any nation, the people I care about are more important than any nation. And Jaakko has a point, this does have a tinge of fascist rhetoric about it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
Thanks SlowHand, I was waiting for someone to bring up God and family. Family is more important than Nation. My family are the only ones who give a **** whether or not I eat. The problem here is that the Nation doesn't really respect the sanctity of the home any more. The Bill of Rrights was our guard against tyranny, but the War on Drugs and the War on Terrorism has almost completely eroded the Bill of Rights. Now with the Rico Act and the Patriot Act, the government can seize your property without the benefit of a court trial, lock you away without legal representation among other things.
Sandman: The species? Glib, but interesting, could you expound a little more on that please? We are certainly not a United Planet or anything.
lightblue: You say you couldn't care less about the Nation. That is a fairly cavalier statement. Are you saying that you don't care when someone betrays their Nation's interests. Where do you stand on treason? A traitor in one Nation is a hero in another. Same question for you paiktis. I am not saying you are wrong, but this isn't a simplistic issue.
Orange: I agree with you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MosesPresley
lightblue: You say you couldn't care less about the Nation. That is a fairly cavalier statement. Are you saying that you don't care when someone betrays their Nation's interests. Where do you stand on treason? A traitor in one Nation is a hero in another. Same question for you paiktis. I am not saying you are wrong, but this isn't a simplistic issue.
|
Hmm, let me explain where I come from. I carry a Dutch passport, I've grown up in Luxembourg and have lived in the UK for the past 6 years. I don't have roots, and would not call any particular place home over the other. As such I'd say I do not have a Nation in the meaning you assign to it.
In general I assign respect for human rights a far greater importance, so if those would be endangered by the actions of whatever government of whatever nation I would find myself in, then acting against this government would not be an act of treason on my part, but rather a justified fight.
The only people that can commit treason in my view are those that endanger the freedom of other people, and as such are more likely to be politicians rather than someone sending back research data to China or something.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
Thanks Ari Rahikkala.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Everything's more important than the nation. A nation is simply an arbitrary lasso thrown around a group of people. They are invented realities, they do not describe real things. Nations are things of the past. One day they will all be abolished. |
I agree che, but what will they be replaced by: A Family of Man, the United Planet, any ideas on what that might look like? The Nation appears to our strongest social construct right now, but it leads to endless wars, so logically, I assume there must be an alternative.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by statusperfect
That's post modern bullshit |
Hardly. Post-modernism would see the nation as being as valid as any other group, since they would all be arbitrarily created groups, even familes, ethnicities, etc. On the other hand, those who've studied nationalism and the concept of nation intensely, such as I have, know that the concept of nation is only a little more than 200 years old, that nations are arbitrarily created (ask the Finns for example) and have little to do with geography (the Jews) or language (the Swiss). In simple words, nations are simply groups of people that call themselves a nation and that others agree they are a nation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|