 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002
time: 06:24
|
|
Irrigate or mine?
Personally my opinion is irrigate. I think that Pamplona has enough other lands who can be irrigated and where it can get his production from, but I'd like to hear the opinion of the Spanish nobles about it, specially the opinion from Pamplona's Governor, señor Ruby_Maser.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002
time: 06:24
|
|
Yes, the first cow will be irrigated to get the extra commerce.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002
time: 06:24
|
|
From the Pamplona thread:
quote:
Originally posted by ruby_maser
Concerning the second cow, I am of the opinion it should be mined. Strong growth will not be an early problem for this city. With one cow producing 4 food, another producing 3, and a flood plain to the south with the potential for 3 when irrigated, I was able to push the city to size 5 and still have growth within 4 turns. I see growth a secondary issue to shield production. Corruption will take a bite out of this city's shields and maximizing that will be prove more difficult early on. Later, when our labor force has less priorities and mining mountains is not prohibitive, it could always be revised to produce more food.
|
This looks like a valid reason for me. Since it is probable that Pamplona would expent several turns being size 2 and eventually come back after poping some settlers or workers, it is desirable to have an equilibrium between food and production while in size 2. So, go for that mining.
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24.
Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2003 23:34
...when I get home from work 
|