 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Couple things here--
Hysterical title for this thread. Arianna Huffington may be many things, but a Democrat she is definitely NOT. She is an independant conservative reformer. Admittedly, a rare breed, so some confusion is expected.
Secondly, of course these ads are an exaggeration. They're an obvious takeoff of those hyperbolic Drugs = Terrorisms ads that started running last year. No one actually thinks that SUV owners support terrorism. What the ads are trying to do is to get the American consumers to ****ing THINK ABOUT THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR ACTIONS for once. As a people, we are very into instant gratification, me-me-me now-now-now. Our government is the same way--as already pointed out, we were throwing money at our buddies the Taliban when they were burning poppy fields. After all, who could foresee that a brutal, murderous, barbaric regime whose every principle--save one--would use that foreign aid to foster terrorists? Shocking, isn't it?
Anyway, back to the point--the vast majority of people do NOT need SUVs, and that includes you, Rah. The climate I live in is no better or worse than yours, and the roads in Michigan are much worse than those in Illinois. I have always driven small cars, and have never gotten into a single accident. If the cars in your family were getting splattered every winter, I suspect it might have more to do with the driving ability of those involved than on the type of car you drove. If you live in Duluth or Fargo or Sault Sainte Marie or Rochester, that's one thing. But folks in Chicago and Detroit do not need SUVs because of climate conditions. Christ on a crutch, this nonsense gets my blood pressure up.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zkribbler
|
 |
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Feb 1999 time: 21:25
|
|
Imran and rah have a point. Not all SUV's are gas guzzlers. On a rah's Passport, the EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway) are: 17 mpg / 20 mpg. Sure, it doesn't match the milage of my Miata, but then again I can't carry a 8x4 piece of drywall.
Most of the people here are talking about those huge monsters that drink gas.
Like that guy I had to wait for as I was making a left turn the other day. The closer his SUV got to the intersection, the slower it went. And I continued to wait because I knew if I tried to zip in front of him, he'd suddenly speed up and broadside me. The light turned orange and he slowed a bit more, but didn't stop. The light turned red and he entered the intersection, cruising through, chatting blythly on his cell phone. The good news is that, if God answers prayers, he's dead by now. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cia
|
|
Far away from here
Apr 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
I'm just going to climb into my nuclear-powered truck and squish all them pesky terrorists!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MosesPresley
|
|
Mock commercial from GTA 3
Maibatsu Monstrosity SUV (commercial)
Man: "I'm a marketing manager who lives in the suburbs and commutes to work on the highway. I live alone, so of course I needed a car that can seat 12 and is equipped to drive across arctic tundra...it just makes me feel better!"
Woman: "Phil and I just had another kid. So of course we need a bigger SUV. Being a mom is hard, with soccer, football and lacrosse practice, so we bought the new Maibatsu Monstrosity. It's so big...we lost little Joey in the back and couldn't find him for and hour! When I'm rushing to the mall, or talking on my cell phone, I know me and my family are safe. The Maibatsu Monstrosity has 4-wheel drive, and in amphibious mode...it can cross rivers. So far I've only hit a few puddles, but it's good to know it's there. With the time I save taking shortcuts through the strip-mall parking lot I can focus on the important things. Like gazing longingly at the pool boy or...buying more exercise equipment off the TV. So what if it gets 3 miles to the gallon!? I'm a mom, not a conservationist!"
Woman Voice: "The new Maibatsu Monstrosity...mine's bigger!!"
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Skyjack666
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Guynemer
Anyway, back to the point--the vast majority of people do NOT need SUVs, and that includes you, Rah. The climate I live in is no better or worse than yours, and the roads in Michigan are much worse than those in Illinois. I have always driven small cars, and have never gotten into a single accident. |
Ok by that reasoning we should take away any money or any- THING you don't need...wreaks of communism.
This is America, you can have $80,000,000,000.00 and nobody can tell you you can't.
It's the same whiney reasoning behind 're-distribution of wealth'.
Besides, the Government/Auto/Oil Industry are the ones behind burying and clean technology because they are not ready to give up control of the world just yet.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
rah
|
|
Apolyton Prince of Moderators, Master of Reason
|
 |
Lord of the Ferrets
Jan 1970 time: 23:25
|
|
HAHAHAHA, yes, WHO THE HECK does he think he is to tell me what I think I need or don't need. I do a lot of projects around the house that require considerable room for schlepping materials. Most of the time we have to take both vehicles to fit everything in in one trip.
Or I guess he doesn't have a family to worry about their safety. No one is going to tell me that it's not safer to be driving a four-wheel drive vehicle with a higher ground clearance in the snow. (both of ours rated low on the tipover tests) And with all the current trucks and MINIVANS on the road, being up a bit higher drastically improves visability. He's the exact type of person that can K*** my A**. When you ban every 18 wheeler, construction truck, pickup truck, minivan, large cars, buses, etc., THEN, and only then, Might I consider giving up my suv.
You can take chances with your family, I prefer to spend a little extra to help the percentages.
RAH
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Come off it, DL. No one is advocating that SUVs be taken away from people. What is being advocated is that people think about the consequences of their choices when it comes to vehicles, and that the government enforce some sort of mileage standards for SUVs, which are conveniently lacking currently.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:25
|
|
I can see the conservation issue. Perhaps we should all be driving fuel efficient cars. Personally, we have a single Honda civic and like Rah I made the decision to live closer in toward work so that I can easily bicycle or take public Transit.
BUT, our next vehicle will likely be some form of SUV--when I look at what we both "need" and "want" from a vehicle, there are a number of smaller and mid-sized SUVs that fit the bill. Gas economy will be a factor in our decision, but more for economic than environmental reasons.
As for the supporting terror fallacy, I think that has been debunked by enough people here. Why not just say that "Existence supports terror"-- since after all, everbody in a modern society uses some petroleum products
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
quote: Originally posted by rah
What about high performance cars? |
The same thing applies. Merely status symbols, driven in large part by men trying to compensate for sexual inadequacies. I imagine the reason the ads target SUVs as opposed to "high performance cars" is that SUVs, in addition to getting poor mileage, have the extra bugaboo of being a menace to other drivers on the road.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|