 |
|
grimreap
|
|
Bristol, England, UK
Nov 2000 time: 05:13
|
|
I have the planetary pack which has both but I tend to play SMAC a lot more, I don't know why but SMACX just seems daunting and a lot tougher (this is mainly due to the extra native life forms, although thinking about it i could just play on rare lifeforms setting).
Which do you lot prefer out of SMAC and SMACX?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Misotu
|
 |
Leamington Spa, England
Dec 1999 time: 05:13
|
|
I like the additions in SMAX (although I have to admit that I haven't used the faction editor so SMACed might well be right about that).
The way I feel about it is this: I like the SMAC factions better, and I still think the Hive is the strongest AI faction. I don't know whether it's because I played SMAC for so long before SMAX came out, but for me the originals still have more distinct personalities ... although I'm starting to get quite fond of Sven.
In terms of the extra facilities/techs, the biggest thing that SMAX put right, in my opinion, was sea nutrients and energy. The balance between land and sea is much improved - minerals on land, nuts/energy from the ocean (assuming you're a forest fiend like me). Coastal bases generate more food than inland bases - and that makes sense to me.
Many of the secret projects are worthwhile and make sense - the Cloudbase and the Energy Grid for starters.
The Aliens ... well, yeah. I'm not so bothered about them although they can be tough little competitors in the early days if they're close.
Generally I choose to play one of the original factions, but in a SMAX environment without the Aliens. So yes, I'd say the add-on pack is a must-have.
[This message has been edited by Misotu (edited January 02, 2001).]
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13. Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|