 |
|
Firelad
|
|
Haifa, Israel.
May 2002 time: 07:25
|
|
The reasons that I talk more about Israel's crimes than of those of other states are:
1.The fact that I live in it,
2.I feel more connection to it as a result, and
3.Also know more about said crimes, also because I live here.
That's all... That's my battle right now because that's where I'm at.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Firelad
|
|
Haifa, Israel.
May 2002 time: 07:25
|
|
Azazel: The B-word is usually uttered by me in a humorous context. In any case, most of the people in Reali are rich Denyatim (you live in Haifa, you know what I mean) - C'mon Gad Ze'evi's son sits in the next classroom. So you know what I mean.
And I do think that the application of my views would make people much happier. Most certainly it will spare many an untimely death.
If you want to read up on my position on what your view seems to be (I may be misunderstanding you, I admit to know next to nothing about it) then read Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. And remember that I view the book as being ambivalent rather than one-sided as most people seem to consider it. But lately I've started to think that there are more parameters to happiness than Soma can bring. Or whatever that thing's called, haven't read the book for a while, don't have it at home.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Firelad
|
|
Haifa, Israel.
May 2002 time: 07:25
|
|
perfect happiness-creating chemical if u get down in very happy yet pointless BNW society.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanielXY
|
|
Germany
Dec 2002 time: 05:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
nice try Daniel.  
The act of protest makes the protesting individual feel good about it. however many others can disagree strongly, thus it would harm them, that balances the odds against protest. There is the big aspect, though. Protesting araises public awareness to certain problems, and keeps the government accountable, which is usually very utilitarian. It keeps the government vigilant to rights and wrongs.
|
Hm, ok...
but a government which does good enough propaganda that the population doesnt feel the need to protest, since there arent any important issues, would still be better than the ones we have, or no?
quote:
My utilitarian point against his thoughts is the destruction of the State of Israel. |
Hm, dont really know, if the overall world happyness would rise or fall in the case of the destruction of Israel. May depends on the circumstances. At least most of the Arab world would like it. Obviously Israel population wouldnt. Dont know about the rest of the world. But I wouldnt take it for granted that the majority would oppose Israel to be taken off the map.
Note: I dont say I want the destruction of Israel, just saying from an Utilitarian view it isnt so clear if it is a good thing or not.
My point being: Utilitarian is just Mob rule for what is right and wrong.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:25
|
|
quote:
Hm, ok...
but a government which does good enough propaganda that the population doesnt feel the need to protest, since there arent any important issues, would still be better than the ones we have, or no?
|
no because an actual good government would be much better in terms of happiness.
quote:
Hm, dont really know, if the overall world happyness would rise or fall in the case of the destruction of Israel. May depends on the circumstances. At least most of the Arab world would like it. Obviously Israel population wouldnt. Dont know about the rest of the world. But I wouldnt take it for granted that the majority would oppose Israel to be taken off the map.
|
most of the arab world would prefer to take Israel off the map. That's undeniable. The question is, whould more happiness ensue from such an event. say, Israel is overrun by the palestinians. does that improve the situation of millions of people in the arab world? not by bit. They still live in dirt poor conditions, the women are still abused, the people are still opressed, children are still born into overpopulating countries, etc.
meanwhile the citizens of Israel suffer from either a corrupt regime that occupies them, or from being refugees in other countries.
Think once again, and realize that I am right.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanielXY
|
|
Germany
Dec 2002 time: 05:25
|
|
Ok maybe in the case of Israel it is discussable if it would lead to more happyness or not.
But I was more talking about it in general than a specific example:
If the mayjority chooses they like to commit genocide on a people (for whatever reasons) it is the right thing to do if you think Utilitarian -> Mob Rule
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Az
|
 |
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000 time: 07:25
|
|
quote:
"most of the arab world would prefer to take Israel off the map. That's undeniable. The question is, whould more happiness ensue from such an event. say, Israel is overrun by the palestinians. does that improve the situation of millions of people in the arab world? not by bit"
Does happiness = improving economic situation?
In terms of plain old emotional happiness, I think the Arabs would be delighted if Israel collapsed. Since there are more Arabs than Israelis, therefore overall happiness has increased if Israel were to collapse.
Of course, one could weigh the decrease of happiness of the Israelis more than the overall boost recieved to the Arabs. How would you gauge the happiness loss and compare to the Arab's happiness gain?
|
I am sorry, I fail to see your logic. Of course most of the arab world would be delighted. but how long this orgasm of hate would last? a day, two, a month at most? then, they'll return to be tortured and prosecuted by their leaders.
meanwhile the lives of the Israeli citizens would be destroyed.
the decision in the last week is not a good one, considering Israel's position. I guess one should be a superpower to have the right to do such things.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maroule
|
|
Hum, some interesting points all around,
I’ll start by the trivial first
1/ Belgians : I love these guys (much nicer than French ), but committed (as a state, don’t take that personally) a near genocide in Congo. Very well documented now, if little publicised, and absolutely horrendous (a bit like what we French did in Madagascar, around 47, I think). Yet army intervention doesn’t necessarily lead to slaughter, it can also prevent it, look at what is happening right now in Ivory Coast. The army is just a tool, state policies are the ones to blame.
2/ thumbs up for anybody taking non violent action to uphold its beliefs.
3/ “most of the arab world would prefer to take Israel off the map. That's undeniable. The question is, would more happiness ensue from such an event.”
Wrong question. Firstly, the ‘Arab street’ would probably be delighted by the disappearance of Israel, but they would also be probably happy just with the creation of a Palestinian state living in peace with Israel. Secondly, the genuine question for Israelis is related to Israel itself, what it is ready to do to ensure its preservation, what are its values, etc.
It has been said before, but Israel is fighting 2 wars, one against fanatic groups, for which it should have all our support, and where compromise is probably not possible. But it mixed that with a second war, against a whole population, by instrumentalising settlers and fanatics, by bullying palestinian civilians and driving them to submission, and by delaying the inevitable (the creation of a viable Palestinian state). This second war goes against the very justification of the original existence of Israel (create a haven for persecuted people). There are ways to separate the two wars, it has all been said before.
Anyway, these days I have the utmost sense of sympathy for anybody going against Sharon…
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maroule
|
|
you did not have problems to withdraw unilaterally from Lebanon when it suited you, even though that was blotched. Allowing a viable palestinian state to exist would also deprive most hardliner palestinians all legitimacy. Those who really want the destruction of Israel (and are hiding behind claims for just a state) would be exposed. As for who would direct this state, don't worry, nature hates emptiness, and it would give a jolt to palestinian politics, fostering it on the administration of this new state.
One sticky point would be Jerusalem, but that will have to be resolved too, if you want to avoid another 50 years of bloodshed.
But I'm not candid, I know how hard these seemingly simple ideas are to implement. I just can't see any other solution, and definitely the preservation of the current status quo is neither possible nor desirable.
I also know I'm not suffering directly from the situation, so it's easier for me to say. Still, I think Likud policies are going nowhere fast, to the detriment of Israelis.
Last edited by Maroule on 16-01-2003 at 15:34
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|