 |
President for Term 8, Run-off
This poll is closed. |
| Arnelos |
   |
30 |
47.62% |
| Aro |
   |
32 |
50.79% |
| Abstain/Banana |
   |
1 |
1.59% |
| Total: |
63 voters |
100% |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Arnelos
|
 |
of the Free World
Sep 2002
time: 00:25
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by GhengisFarb
Yes, your VP choice, and their willingness to perform the duty could be useful in determining who we would choose to support. |
I had wanted to keep that a surprise, but I agree that the voters likely deserve that information.
My first choice as Vice President is the SAME PERSON it was last term, but he's accepted for this term (he turned me down last time).
That person is Nimitz.
He is fully willing to serve, as he's getting a brand new computer and should be able to host turnchats now (where he says it would have been difficult before).
His would-be replacement to the Court is the issue I've been trying to wrestle with over the past week.
Of course, if I don't win, Nimitz stays on the Court 
As for panag, if he's available this Friday, he may very well end up running a turnchat (because my availability for that evening is pretty shaky). Picking Nimitz for next term isn't really a vote of no confidence against panag, as I have faith (unlike some...) that he could have handled himself in a turnchat far better than it seems many would expect (and may yet show that this Friday if he's around). It's that I had told Nimitz from the beginning that if he wanted the position, it was his. Since he now wants it, its his 
I hope that's acceptable to everyone.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GhengisFarb
|
 |
I want my HAMBURGERS!!
May 2002
time: 23:25
|
|
So the tickets are:
Arnelos/Nimitz
(the pacifistic socialists)
VERSUS
Aro/Aggie
(the militant enonomists)
Last edited by GhengisFarb on 16-01-2003 at 09:02
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Arnelos
|
|
of the Free World
Sep 2002
time: 00:25
|
|
So, in other words...
Arnelos/Nimitz
(pro-development, pro-space race, pro-democracy)
VERSUS
Aro/Aggie
(pro-war, pro-domination, pro-theocratic socialism?)
Last edited by Arnelos on 16-01-2003 at 09:06
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Arnelos
|
|
of the Free World
Sep 2002
time: 00:25
|
|
pfft.
It was those Hawks that were always pushing for knights before marketplaces and cavalry before banks!
The DIA has always stood for building more marketplaces, banks, courthouses, etc. We also voted, nearly unanimously, in favor of building WALL STREET at the earliest available opportunity in the most recent vote on prioritizing large construction projects.
No role-play there!
I and Nimitz have been clearly in favor of building up the financial situation for the nation and others such as our wonderful Domestic Minister Spiffor have done nothing but promote the construction of additional financial institutions to increase the money and economic strength of our economy.
The socialists and hawks, on the other hand, have done nothing but attempt to thwart our efforts to expand the Apolytonian economy. They have, at every turn, tried to prevent us from constructing marketplaces, banks, the Wall Street small wonder, and other pro-financial moves. They have also supported attacking critical trade partners from which we make HUNDREDS of LPT per turn in lucrative trade deals!
No, GhengisFarb, it is the communist hawks who stand against common sense business interests!
If you'd like to come over to the side of the pro-business community, perhaps you should become a builder 
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25.
Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
16-01-2003 07:40
|