 |
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
If the US was trying to make Iraq a colony, good for them! They would be part of a stable democracy with the right to travel and free speech. Nobody would be trying to exterminate the minorities in their country as Saddam is. Sure, the US and allies would gain the oil wealth of the country but do you think Iraqi people would see any of that anyway?
When the euros took over countries they crushed the people under an iron boot. Hell, concentration camps were invented during the Boer war and only perfected by the Germans later. These countries peoples are full of criticism over US foriegn policy but the forget that the US isn't the mass murderers when it comes to modern foriegn policy. We didn't instigate imperialism, colonialism. We didn't invade African nations or try to assimilate Algeria like the French. We weren't the ones who enslaved South Americans to work in gold mines like Spain and Portugal or gave small pox to American Indians like the English.
Sure, we supported people like the Shah of Iran but that was to contain the Soviets. Because of these efforts of containment eastern europe is free, the Russians themselves have basic rights.
Yet the european people have discovered morality all of a sudden and accuse the US of improper foriegn policy.
It's fairly funny, but we consider the source.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"We didn't invade African nations or try to assimilate Algeria like the French."
Well if the french had tried the US style in Algeria, they would have massacred at least 10 times as many natives, put the rest into reservations, and had no serious problems with independence movements....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
Hersh, it was mostly early colonizers that did that...euros. Later, when the US liberated became independant it was again mostly euro immigrants that headed west and came into conflict w/ the Indians. The US cavalry became involved only when the euros got themselves into trouble encroaching on Indian land. The folks that were then considered Americans were mostly in the original 13 colonies and many opposed what immigrants who headed west were doing to both the Indians and the buffalo...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
First the US ended the british declaration on the settlement limits ofter independence. Second the US claimed those lands and organised them as territories, later states. Third the US government violated or embraced the violation of virtually all treaties made with native Americans.
Conclusion: It's been the Euros' fault! (And I blame the yankees for the Boer war)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
Eh well, it was worth a shot.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Chris 62
You forgot how Britian renegged on the 1783 treaty, and egged on the natives to attack the Americans in the period between the revolution and the war of 1812, a major factor in the US never again believing the natives would not keep their word. |
Did both sides really need that to confirm their mutual trust?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Seeker
|
 |
London Ontario
Jan 1970 time: 00:25
|
|
It looks like this:
A socialist government is elected* with a mandate of nationalizing US owned companies or otherwise threatening US interests. They throw out the old officer/industry guys.
The US spends billions to first create, and then assist, an opposition that will take over the country and run it in compliance with US wishes. The oppostion is usually a brutal paramilitary with advanced weapons, intel, and air support, vs some farmers with AKs and machetes (who are ignorant, poor, and thus equally brutal).
*or threatens to be elected, in which the US backed Army must 'save the people from themselves' by taking over and doing a good ole disappearance of intellectuals and liberal-types.
Also, of course, those cases in which the 'socialist' government is just a bunch of thugs who called them selves 'Marxist' to get money from the Soviets (the case in too many African countries to count).
I suppose it is a defensible policy if you believe the US is this really great country that will save the world, and therefore it has to protect its interests at all costs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Demerzel
|
|
I think I'll quote one of the American members of this forum with one slight change
"Yawn... gee, another Anti-European thread. How original. Yawn... I'll give it 0.00000000000000001 / 10"
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|