 |
| |
|
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
Was going over the backbone reasons for building crawlers, and re-remembered an important point. It's touched on in the strat guide, but perhaps not spelled out explicitly, so I figured it warranted a post.
The A#1 reason to build crawlers as quickly as you get the tech for it is RAPID DEVELOPMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE.
Play a test scenario. Build two bases. Have one base work on developing core infrastructure, and have the other one build it's crawler suite to maximize mineral counts first, and THEN build infrastructure. Of course, the base that is not building crawlers will take an early lead in infrastructure development, but remember, if you set those crawlers to harvesting minerals, then each subsequent crawler will take less time to build, and even without rushing anything, the base that builds crawlers first will finish its infrastructure FAR ahead of the base that does not (creating LOTS of turn advantage for you).
So, if you want to toss up infrastructure faster than anybody else, run FM for cash (to help pay rush-costs), and build crawlers like they're going out of style to "give yourself" a huge industry bonus, and you're set.... 
-=Vel=-
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Velociryx
|
|
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
Back indeed, Sir SMACed.....even tho I don't get much opportunity to play the game these days, I can't seem to stay away from my first real home on the 'net....
And Artemis, I shall do some copy/paste magic and send you a copy of the file, as soon as I hit "submit" on this post... Ahhhh, and I'm glad you've joind the ranks of the crawler-addicted!
SMACed has a point though....crawlers make the game really easy to run away with. Liberal use of them is one of the keys to doing such things as....oh...say, rushing half a dozen SP's to completion in a single turn, which can pretty much lock up the game....even though the AI doesn't take a mineral hit when they switch from one thing to another, if they've got 300 mins built up on a project, and you steal it out from under them by building it first, they'll invariably switch to a military unit, and once completed, they lose all but ten of the excess minerals, which can put you REALLY far ahead of the game. Do that to a faction 2-3 times and they're as good as toast....too much lost capacity...OUCH! And, in MP, they're big time targets!
-=Vel=-
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Artemis
|
|
Sydney, Australia
Jan 2001
time: 05:13
|
|
On that note then, I will limit myself to two crawlers per base at any given time - shaking already. Only play SP so I like the AI to give me a run for my money. Mind you it already does because the one thing I know for sure is that for everything I know there are ten things I don't.
Vel, the link comes up with 'could not find page requested'. I have emailed you my email address. It's the old saying "I am not paranoid - everyone is out to get me", so my email is not in my profile. Thanks for your help on this tho'.
------------------
-you become responsible for what you tame-
[This message has been edited by Artemis (edited January 12, 2001).]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blake
|
 |
Brainfallocatione
Oct 2000
time: 17:13
|
|
One usful comparison I found was:
Recycling Tanks, cost 4 rows, gives 3 "resource points"
Crawler, cost 3 rows, gives 4 nuts, or 2 minerals/energy
The comparison clearly shows that in the early game crawlers are always a better deal than tanks, especially considering 2 minerals is worth more than nuts or energy in the early game. This assumes spare terraforming, and forest poliferates like crazy and there should be plenty spare once IndAuto comes along.
Anyway I used to be a (resource) crawler addict but I weaned myself off them, usually one per base is enough for me (for an extra farm/condensor tile). I still have no difficulty winning on transcend, and I get a better framerate. I still use the little buggers to hurry SP's, but usually make them the rover variety.
On a side note I played a OCC recently and discovered that mirrors outside your territory don't boost solar panel output. I discovered this after building my energy park. sob. My game became a 2CC
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Artemis
|
|
Sydney, Australia
Jan 2001
time: 05:13
|
|
OCC, 2CC??
------------------
-you become responsible for what you tame-
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Helium Pond
|
|
Los Anheles, California, Good Ole U S of A
Nov 1999
time: 05:13
|
|
I got really tired of supply crawlers because they're a lot of freakin' work and not much fun. I use them now, but sparingly. I don't generally go over 3 or 4 per base.
Blake: I wonder if, by chance, the solar collecter had a forest underneath it? I built a huge energy farm once, and forest spread underneath it, and I realized that the forests were knocking out the effectiveness of my mirrors. You can't build mirrors on top of forest, but unless you put a farm under the mirror, forest can spread under mirrors, effectively "killing" them. Just wondering if that could have been a factor.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DogberryMan
|
|
This might sound stupid, but what is a one city or two city challenge?
------------------
"Are you good men and true?" Much Ado About Nothing, Act III, Scene III
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Rynn:
|
 |
New York, NY
Jun 2000
time: 00:13
|
|
DogberryMan:
As the name implies, the OCC is to transcend (at transcend level) by building only ever one City - ben done several times, so the challenge became ever more limiting - prototypes only, then only the oroginal scout, then zero facilities, etc.
All in the name of making the game more challenging for the elite players.
the 2CC is, as said, the sdame concept but with 2 bases.
There are many such challenges in the old threads such as the lumberjack challenge (all you can do is build and then cut forests for the 5 mins credit) and the probe challenge (must set your research at 9999 years and steal every tech - no trading allowed either)
They tend to be a lot of fun and certainly make you hone skills that otherwise might be underutilized.
IIRC Vel finished the OCC as the Gaians with one lone mindworm garrison and something like 55 crawlers bringing in the energy needed to purchase transcendence. Easiest factions seem to be gaians, pirates, drones, with miriam being by far the hardest.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Blake
|
|
Brainfallocatione
Oct 2000
time: 17:13
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Helium Pond on 01-12-2001 01:06 AM
Blake: I wonder if, by chance, the solar collecter had a forest underneath it? I built a huge energy farm once, and forest spread underneath it, and I realized that the forests were knocking out the effectiveness of my mirrors. You can't build mirrors on top of forest, but unless you put a farm under the mirror, forest can spread under mirrors, effectively "killing" them. Just wondering if that could have been a factor.
|
I've noticed forests spread under mirrors, I know it reduces the tile to a forest output, but I think it still has the mirror effect. It also seems that you can built bases on mirros and they still act as mirrors. In my game the park was freshly built and there was no forest nearby. I should probably test the territory thing, but I've also found with mirrors and solar panels it sometimes gives you the wrong values for the food/min/energy box which comes up, making tests difficult. In my game when I built a city on my energy park my bases energy output shot up about 50%.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Blake
|
|
Brainfallocatione
Oct 2000
time: 17:13
|
|
quote:
Blake,
I think the map in the base screen can only show 8 values of a particular resource, with the highest one being 8+. Thus you have to resort to manually removing the worker or crawler from the square and noting the difference to obtain the production value of those very high production squares.
|
That is true, however the situation I was dealing with my solar park was the solar panels producing 2 naturally (low terrain + uranium flats) and then in theory another +4 from the surronding mirrors, for a expected total of +6, I only got 2 energy, until I built a city in the middle of the park.
Anyway I thought I had better test this, so I made a scenerio with a large flat energy park, half was in my territory and half in neutral territory. The result was that any mirror in your territory increases the output of an adjacant solar panel which is being worked, regardless if the solar panel is in your territory or not. Then the drones were nice enough to build a base next to my park so I tested enemy territory too, mirrors don't work in enemy territory either. I tested this by moving the crawler back and forth over the border, and crawling energy. In entirely neutral/enemy territory the value was 2 energy, in my territory 6 energy. To be sure I also set my SE to +4 effic and cranked energy to 100% and genned a turn to make sure that amount of energy was correctly credited, it was.
So any echlon mirror built in neutral/another players territory does NOT help your solar panels, atleast in SMAX v2. I'm also guessing this is why I thought that sometimes the energy given at the crawler resource select dialoug was inaccurate, because both times I recall it given "wrong" values my park was partly in neutral or pactmate territory.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13.
Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-01-2001 05:07
|
|