 |
What do you think?
This poll is closed. |
| I say lets work this out and do it. |
   |
2 |
22.22% |
| I reject this idea for one reason or another |
   |
7 |
77.78% |
| Total: |
9 voters |
100% |
|
| |
|
|
ManicStarSeed
|
 |
of my banana plantation
Jun 2002
time: 21:25
|
|
The court has been plagued with cases as of late. I have been mulling over the idea of an amendment that could help the system a little.
In short I am thinking about an amendment to the "Court" section that requires the plantiff of any case to be wronged before bringing a case to court... You know.. in the case of the veto, the senate was wronged so the senate must (as a body) vote to take it to court. Aggie, as the author of the bill had a real case here. In the instance of the MPPS, only the Senate (as a voting body) or Arnelos (The FAM at the time) were wronged, only they had the right to seek justice.
There would have to be some sort of clause modifying the impreachment process where the request for impeachment must go through the senate first before the court hears the case.
In short I think that this can be done without revoking any rights, It just relieves some court burden with the use of some guidelines.
Any suggestions regarding wording are welcome.
Vote and discuss
Thanks
Mss
Last edited by ManicStarSeed on 19-01-2003 at 01:16
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25.
Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
19-01-2003 01:08
. This takes away the rights of the people. I would only support this if it also included some means for the court to do a case without someone bringing it before them.
|