 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:25
|
|
we might not have to put up with that amine **** today...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:25
|
|
"Unlikely. Russia would not be able to bring in sufficient troops and supplies to do so, not until modern technology and a trans-Siberia railroad. "
No Meiji restoration, no Russo-Japanese war in 1905.
Russia was aggressively settling Sakhalin.
Not a big leap from Sakhalin to Hokkaido. The only reason the Japanese ever controlled Hokkaido was after the Meiji, and some of the land reforms. No Meiji, I don't see Japan expanding to Hokkaido.
How many troops does Russia need to take over Korea and Manchuria in 1905, or earlier, like late 19th century?
I don't state when Russia would expand, but I think with a weak China and weak Japan, Russia would expand into the far east at some point.
"Just because the Restoration failed didn't mean Bakufu would still be around."
Why not? What other alternative government do you see in Japan?
No Russo-Japanese war, you don't get any 1905 'revolution' and subsequent crackdown and reforms by the government.
What effects would losing this 1905 revolution have on the government, on Russian strength for the first world war?
What effects would the Anglo-Japanese alliance absence have on the British?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:25
|
|
That's some serious speculation material ! 
First, the shogunate would have been forced by both external and internal pressures to modernize, but it would have been reluctant to do it, and Japan's modernization would have been extremely slow, like China's.
Japan would have not been associated to WW1, and its industry would have been scarce by WW2, as no ruler would have sacrificed the whole agriculture as Meiji did. However, there would have been more industry than in China, since years of isolation and internal trade had accumulated huge capital reserves, and Japanese commercial methods were quite efficient. In all cases, Japanese economy wouldn't have been completely dependant of Europe unlike China's.
Incidentally, WW2 might have never been called "World War" as Japan would have played a nearly useless role, being under control of the most influencial European countries there (probably NL).
Without Pearl Harbor, the US might have remained isolationsitic for a longer time during WW2, until it realized that USSR progresses are too threatening. USSR might have taken whole Germany and Greece because of such a lag, and maybe Italy would have known some Soviet occupation.
After the war, Japan may have struggled against western influence, maybe through an important communist party. Had Japan and Germany been part of the Soviet Empire, the USSR might still be around today.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|