 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:25
|
|
As of right now, a showdown over Iraq in the UN seems to be fast approching:
Jan 27: UN weapons inspectors report
Jan 28: US State of the Union speech
Jan 31: Summit between Bush and Blair in Camp David.
As various threads state, the possibility that the UN explicitly renounce a invasion of Iraq at this point seems possible, which brings up the point about Tony Blair's political position.
Popular support for a war right now in the UK is very low, and the same is true or support within the ruling party: unlike in the US, popular opinion (and party opinion) in the UK can bring down governments, with votes of no confidence.
So, lets take the following, possible scenerio (likely one, too):
The US declares that time has run out for Iraq, that a war will soon be on, but the UN refuses to support Bush, thus makin this war, one of the "willing"; Blair, having gone in too deep, has to back Bush and send Britian to war as well. What happens in Britian then?
1) Mass protests by anti-war groups, but Labor backbenchers decide to stick with Tony?
2) ditto, except that Labor backbenchers revolt, throwing the current Labor leadership (that is, Tony) into a political crisis?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Proteus_MST
|
|
Would Blairs decision be backed by his government?
This is the big question.
I remember reading about rising dissence about the War in Iraq within the party and the parliament.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...requestid=74494
If Blair acts smart he will support Bushs war only if the UN give their O.K.
And I somehow trust Blair more on this matter than George W. Bush
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
Various fairly prominent anti war types in the Labour Party have been rather quiet. It is quite likely that they have been more or less promised no war without an explicit UN mandate. Time will tell.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Viceroy
|
 |
tu mumbai se, mai Bombay se
Nov 2000 time: 05:25
|
|
Blairs position is still too stong for even a bad war to threaten his position, especially as the opposition is even more pro war, and the lib dems are still not breaking into 2nd position. At the end of the day, British politics is about re-election, MP's will think carefully, do they support the war in Iraq .. probably not, will they still have their seat at the next election, probably .. so they will not be too concerned. Of course, there are a few MP's who have put their own morality before party, and it is those that are making noises now.
I would not say that support for war amongst the British people is very low, Id say an American attack on Iraq without UN agreement would certainly not be supported, however, a UN backed war on Iraq would receive a 50/50 for/against.
A lot of the protesters at the recent anti war rallies are the usual suspects, along with a few religious groups who should (in my opinion) have been out on the streets in equal measure after Sep 11th .. but thats another thread.
War in Iraq will not threaten blair, however, if a credible opposition was to come about, (ie IDS replaced with Kenneth Clarke) and big mistakes were made, and people were killed .. then I believe blair would find for the first time, his job on the line.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|