Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > Can Blair survive Bush?
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (2): [ 1   2   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
GePap is offline GePap
King
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:25
  Old Post 21-01-2003 22:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Can Blair survive Bush? Inflate your Upload Space

As of right now, a showdown over Iraq in the UN seems to be fast approching:

Jan 27: UN weapons inspectors report
Jan 28: US State of the Union speech
Jan 31: Summit between Bush and Blair in Camp David.

As various threads state, the possibility that the UN explicitly renounce a invasion of Iraq at this point seems possible, which brings up the point about Tony Blair's political position.
Popular support for a war right now in the UK is very low, and the same is true or support within the ruling party: unlike in the US, popular opinion (and party opinion) in the UK can bring down governments, with votes of no confidence.

So, lets take the following, possible scenerio (likely one, too):
The US declares that time has run out for Iraq, that a war will soon be on, but the UN refuses to support Bush, thus makin this war, one of the "willing"; Blair, having gone in too deep, has to back Bush and send Britian to war as well. What happens in Britian then?

1) Mass protests by anti-war groups, but Labor backbenchers decide to stick with Tony?
2) ditto, except that Labor backbenchers revolt, throwing the current Labor leadership (that is, Tony) into a political crisis?

Proteus_MST is offline Proteus_MST
Prince

Dec 2001
time: 06:25
  Old Post 21-01-2003 22:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Would Blairs decision be backed by his government?
This is the big question.
I remember reading about rising dissence about the War in Iraq within the party and the parliament.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/mai...requestid=74494

If Blair acts smart he will support Bushs war only if the UN give their O.K.
And I somehow trust Blair more on this matter than George W. Bush

CerberusIV is offline CerberusIV
King

Oct 2002
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 00:43 Visit CerberusIV's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

Various fairly prominent anti war types in the Labour Party have been rather quiet. It is quite likely that they have been more or less promised no war without an explicit UN mandate. Time will tell.

Az is offline Az
King
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000
time: 07:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 00:56
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

It depends the way war on Iraq goes.

I don't really see an alternative. The tories are actually very supportive of Blair. now if they could actually switch sides without getting flag for inconsistency... nah, that would be too ... continental.

Dauphin is offline Dauphin
Emperor
Caught in a tuna net
Jan 1970
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 00:58
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

The government majority is so big that a massive back bench revolt is required.

There is also no guarentee that the Tories would vote against the government if IDS is made privy to the things Tony "knows".

KrazyHorse is offline KrazyHorse
King
Macedonia
May 2001
time: 00:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 01:04 Visit KrazyHorse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

A vote of no confidence is doubtful. But Tony might be in for a leadership review sometime before the next election if he massively violates the wishes of his caucus, as a war without UN support is likely to do.

KrazyHorse is offline KrazyHorse
King
Macedonia
May 2001
time: 00:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 01:06 Visit KrazyHorse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

This is, of course, assuming I'm reading Brit politics correctly. I'm not as plugged in to them as I am to Canadian and American politics.

chegitz guevara is offline chegitz guevara
King
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 01:17 Visit chegitz guevara's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

Massive anti-war protests could bring Blair down. No one thought tax protests would bring down Thatcher. Most likely Blair would resign rather than face a vote of no-confidence, which would force an election.

You Brits need to hop to it. Blair needs to be reminded he serves the interests of the British elites, not the American government.

Az is offline Az
King
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000
time: 07:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 01:22
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote:

You Brits need to hop to it. Blair needs to be reminded he serves the interests of the British elites, not the American government.

Clear Skies is offline Clear Skies
Prince
looking for a saviour in these dirty streets
Jul 2000
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 03:06 Visit Clear Skies's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#10 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

There's already steam building in the Cabinet over the issue - and not just Clare Short shooting her mouth off either (though we all love it when she does). Cook and even Brown himself are said to have reservations about a war on Iraq.
Also...what size is Blair's majority again? 160 something? So it requires a revolt of a little over 80 to push a vote the other way...I'd say it's unlikely, but not impossible. Especially with public opinion swinging so obviously away from a war. 77% (from www.mori.com) oppose a unilateral war against Iraq, while 39% oppose even UN-backed military action.

The Viceroy is offline The Viceroy
Prince
tu mumbai se, mai Bombay se
Nov 2000
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 03:38
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#11 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

Blairs position is still too stong for even a bad war to threaten his position, especially as the opposition is even more pro war, and the lib dems are still not breaking into 2nd position. At the end of the day, British politics is about re-election, MP's will think carefully, do they support the war in Iraq .. probably not, will they still have their seat at the next election, probably .. so they will not be too concerned. Of course, there are a few MP's who have put their own morality before party, and it is those that are making noises now.

I would not say that support for war amongst the British people is very low, Id say an American attack on Iraq without UN agreement would certainly not be supported, however, a UN backed war on Iraq would receive a 50/50 for/against.

A lot of the protesters at the recent anti war rallies are the usual suspects, along with a few religious groups who should (in my opinion) have been out on the streets in equal measure after Sep 11th .. but thats another thread.

War in Iraq will not threaten blair, however, if a credible opposition was to come about, (ie IDS replaced with Kenneth Clarke) and big mistakes were made, and people were killed .. then I believe blair would find for the first time, his job on the line.

Provost Harrison is offline Provost Harrison
Emperor
The farce is strong with this one.
Feb 2000
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 03:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#12 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

It is very scary that Blair is still intent on taking the country into war in the face of the majority being opposed to it. He is really going to cause trouble if he keep going ahead.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 04:15
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#13 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

I can just see Blair being overthrown because France vetoed a U.N. authorization for war against Iraq.

My god, but the people of England must really love and respect France.

The Viceroy is offline The Viceroy
Prince
tu mumbai se, mai Bombay se
Nov 2000
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 04:23
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#14 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

Nahh won't happen .. the British people couldn't overthrow maggie for 3 terms, and Blair will be no different.

some people don't like what is happening, but when they look at the alternatives, they suddenly realise, who else is there ???

Blair will not loose an election, he will stand down sometime in his 3rd term.

KrazyHorse is offline KrazyHorse
King
Macedonia
May 2001
time: 00:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 04:48 Visit KrazyHorse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#15 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote:
Originally posted by Ned
I can just see Blair being overthrown because France vetoed a U.N. authorization for war against Iraq.

My god, but the people of England must really love and respect France.


Yeah, right. The only reason the UN won't authorize force is that the French will veto it. It has nothing to do with the fact that the US has failed to provide any evidence whatsoever of Saddam possessing WMD.

The Viceroy is offline The Viceroy
Prince
tu mumbai se, mai Bombay se
Nov 2000
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 04:53
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#16 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

One of the reasons maybe the french enjoy veto'ing american SC resolutions, is that you DONT respect them!

ThePantaloonDog is offline ThePantaloonDog
Chieftain
Baltimore, Maryland but currently in dirty, dirty New London CT
Feb 2001
time: 00:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 05:22
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#17 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

Blair will survive.

I think this was already mentioned but the U.K. really doesn't have any alternatives. I believe this is why despite doing very little his first term Blair was elected to a second term if I'm understanding British politics correctly.

lightblue is offline lightblue
Chieftain
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 05:23
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#18 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

If you add the Tories to Tony's majority they'll need a lot more for a succesfull revolt. There's no way IDS is gongi to vote against the government on this, they're coming out with more hawkish language than the government is. Anyway, Tories have their fingers in lot of corporations and war means nice new contracts

DanS is offline DanS
Emperor
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970
time: 00:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 05:52 Visit DanS's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#19 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Blair is a smart cookie. His star is not hitched to Bush's.

It seems unlikely that the backbench would revolt, when troops are in the field. I guess the UK has a "support the troops" political dynamic while so close to action?

Shi Huangdi is offline Shi Huangdi
Emperor
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999
time: 00:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 08:23
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#20 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

I guess Britain is now seeing the consequence of giving one party such a lopsided majority. It seems Blair has a free hand to do pretty much whatever he wants now...

Park Avenue is offline Park Avenue
Emperor
Liberal and defender of freedoms for the people
Oct 1999
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 17:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#21 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Someone mentioned the church leaders.

How about we demand the same proof from them in their profession that they are demanding from Blair.

MikeH is offline MikeH
Emperor
Ming on rakastajani
May 1999
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 17:27 Visit MikeH's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#22 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

I don't think Blair will be forced out over this.

I think he might insist that there is a UN resolution before we go to war. Otherwise he's really shooting himself in the foot... that said, with his majority and the main opposition party even more out of touch with the public on this issue then I'm not sure even that would force him out. Would they vote out Tony and then vote in the Tories who have much stronger support for unilateral war against Iraq? Seems unlikely.

KrazyHorse is offline KrazyHorse
King
Macedonia
May 2001
time: 00:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 18:33 Visit KrazyHorse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#23 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote:
Originally posted by DanS
Blair is a smart cookie. His star is not hitched to Bush's.

It seems unlikely that the backbench would revolt, when troops are in the field. I guess the UK has a "support the troops" political dynamic while so close to action?


Nothing like the US', from what I've seen...

KrazyHorse is offline KrazyHorse
King
Macedonia
May 2001
time: 00:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 18:34 Visit KrazyHorse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#24 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

quote:
Originally posted by MikeH
I don't think Blair will be forced out over this.

I think he might insist that there is a UN resolution before we go to war. Otherwise he's really shooting himself in the foot... that said, with his majority and the main opposition party even more out of touch with the public on this issue then I'm not sure even that would force him out. Would they vote out Tony and then vote in the Tories who have much stronger support for unilateral war against Iraq? Seems unlikely.


That's the thing. He might not be in for a majority government next time round if he does anything like this (fight without UN). What's the current breakdown of Parliament?

MikeH is offline MikeH
Emperor
Ming on rakastajani
May 1999
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 18:40 Visit MikeH's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#25 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

We support the troops, not the politicians. Massive difference. We know it's not the soldiers fault if they are sent into action so there's no point blaming them.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/vote2001/

Labour: 413, Conservative: 166, Lib Dem: 52, others: 28

KrazyHorse is offline KrazyHorse
King
Macedonia
May 2001
time: 00:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 18:41 Visit KrazyHorse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#26 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Wow. The Lib Dems are in for some pickups (I would guess) if Blair does anything rash. Maybe they could be the official opposition...

MikeH is offline MikeH
Emperor
Ming on rakastajani
May 1999
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 18:55 Visit MikeH's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#27 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

Yes. The Liberals are the least pro war party of the three. And the most left wing. You'd assume that any votes lost from labour because of anti-war feelings would go to the lib dems.

Labour would have to lose a huge number of seats to lose power though. Blair is mainly seen to be doing a good job as well by most people. He comes across as a good leader anyway. We're always very critical of our leaders. That's what being in a democracy is about. The opposition leaders really aren't very inspiring.

KrazyHorse is offline KrazyHorse
King
Macedonia
May 2001
time: 00:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 18:57 Visit KrazyHorse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#28 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

Don't even know who your opposition leaders are. I've got enough to keep track of over here. 4 of the 5 major parties have (or will have) switched their leaders in a period of ~18 months.

MikeH is offline MikeH
Emperor
Ming on rakastajani
May 1999
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 19:04 Visit MikeH's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#29 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

Charles Kennedy - Liberal Democrats

Ian and/or Duncan Smith - Conservatives but he's even more low profile than William Hague was before him so no-one knows who he is either.

Clear Skies is offline Clear Skies
Prince
looking for a saviour in these dirty streets
Jul 2000
time: 05:25
  Old Post 22-01-2003 20:05 Visit Clear Skies's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#30 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

Kennedy is the only one of the three with a positive approval rating, and it's high as well - over 35% IIRC.

 
Pages (2): [ 1   2   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25.
Apolyton Time is 00:25.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0759 seconds (92.31% PHP - 7.69% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net