 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Urban Ranger
|
|
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
The time for special economic regions is loooooong past. He could have tried it 10 years ago. |
10 years ago? I am not sure if he has been in power for that long.
quote: Originally posted by DanS
Re the repurcussions to China of mass migration, this is all true to a point. But it would give a certain amount of control to the situation. The repurcussions could be foreseen and planned for, just as they were in Afghanistan for a similar number of refugees. Does this part of China have less infrastructure than Afghanistan? |
No, yet DPRK has a lot more people. Yes, something could be done about it, but the drain is significant. I should know, Hong Kong was the First Port of Asylum for Vietnamese boat people. [Dreadful Brits] Another thing is, unless ROK will take all of them unconditionally, otherwise, a million or two refugees waiting for aid is a heavy burden.
quote: Originally posted by DanS
Right now, nobody has control over the situation. We don't even know if Kim Jong Il has a realistic end-game. He might be signing checks that nobody's ass can ever cash. This is a much more dangerous situation than a couple of million refugees well provisioned for. |
I think the Sunshine Policy is right. You need to contact the North Koreans, not put them in isolation like the US has been doing. Actually they just need food and fuel and trading partners.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:25
|
|
"Actually they just need food and fuel and trading partners."
And why should we care? What do we get in return for this?
The NK government is a bunch of nutfvcks and has no legitimacy as far as I'm concerned. They couldn't spend our money effectively, and I'm loathe to put good money after bad.
It's time for freedom for the people of NK. We should demand it!
I think the Sunshine Policy is right.
It appears to be morphing into an abomination, where SK is supporting a hideous regime in return for NK not committing suicide.
All true negotiations have a walk away point for each side. What the Sunshine Policy is turning into--no walk away point for SK--takes away support for negotiations, by giving NK a distorted dataset for what the SK and the world community are willing to accept. This causes highly dangerous situations, in that NK thinks it can shoot for the moon and get it.
(As an aside, that's precisely why the Palestinian Authority did the correct thing in walking away from Camp David. In the long-term, the PA effectively communicated the parameters of an acceptable deal.)
I was all for the Sunshine Policy a couple of years ago, given that I thought it was a very temporary thing designed to get the ball rolling.
The erratic nature of NK diplomacy may be the result of political infighting.
Ali: It could be. I don't think we have a good handle on the internal politics of NK, at least publically here in the West.
Last edited by DanS on 30-01-2003 at 00:45
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:25
|
|
To close the loop, Kim Jong Il came into power in 1994, 9 years ago, as UR points out.
Last edited by DanS on 30-01-2003 at 21:10
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ranskaldan
|
 |
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001 time: 00:25
|
|
The idealistic approach, of course, would be to bring down the current NK government, and install a democratic government that allows free trade. Yes, but how realistic is that? How many lives will be lost in the ensuing power vacuum? How badly will the state be torn apart -- and where would those missiles fly once the NK military is rended into factions? More importantly, with the country in shambles and whipped into a frenzy, what democratic leader will emerge?
This "several decades of despotism", unfortunately, may be the only way NK can elevate itself out of the current mess. Not the current starve-the-people-and-build-nukes despotism, of course; NK is surrounded by countries whose dictators, while in power, did a lot better.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Felch
|
 |
Germantown, Maryland
Sep 2001 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ranskaldan
How many lives will be lost in the ensuing power vacuum? How badly will the state be torn apart -- and where would those missiles fly once the NK military is rended into factions? More importantly, with the country in shambles and whipped into a frenzy, what democratic leader will emerge?
|
Who gives a ****? We gave them fuel, in exchange for not making nukes. They made nukes. They owe us for all the oil we gave them, when they were acting in bad faith. Until they pay us back, they shouldn't get anything from us other than a pounding.
Seriously, you all are basing your views on the assumption that America is always wrong. Sometimes we are wrong. We were wrong to trust North Korea. We're wrong to be focusing on Iraq. We're wrong to negotiate with the gangsters in Pyongyang. If we dealt with them as they deserve to be treated, razing cities, plowing salt into their fields, et al., we would be in the right.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|