 |
|
123john321
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
(...)Personally, I think it's time to see this regime fall. |
Yup, North Kearon is more of a theart to the Western civ than Iraq...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:25
|
|
We can walk and chew gum at the same time.
Edit: SK saying they don't want a regime change...
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2...2911603253.html
It would put large strains on SK, but would it be better to stand by while paying a repressive regime to limp along? I think everybody would be receptive to helping SK shoulder the burden. The SK policy seems unprincipled to me.
Last edited by DanS on 27-01-2003 at 07:39
|
|
|  |
 |
|
123john321
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
We can walk and chew gum at the same time. |
Yes, you can, I the Brits help (which they will...)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:25
|
|
This is a very freaky thing for all the nations around it - Japan, South Korea, China, Russia. Just imagine the millions of millions of refugees pouring across borders and massing themselves in half-rickety boats across the Yellow and Japan Seas, not to mention the missiles that may be launched in any direction.
Yes, I know that there would be millions of refugees, but this would be a much better situation than watching them starve and toiling away in death camps. It's a matter of conscience. I don't want my tax dollars going to perpetuating a regime that makes Hitler look like a boy scout in comparison.
We have a precedent for this. Just as Hungary did for the East Germans, China should not enforce its treaty with NK to repatriate refugees. This would funnel the refugees in one direction, where they can be processed in an orderly fashion.
China could then pass them along by boat to SK. SK is a first world country and is able to handle this. The US should stand ready to help them and do much of the heavy lifting.
That's the way that this government falls without the missiles starting to fly.
Last edited by DanS on 29-01-2003 at 06:27
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ranskaldan
|
 |
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001 time: 00:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
The US cannot take down this regime, without a nuke landing in Tokyo, as mentioned above.
The NKers have to do it themselves. The only thing we can do is encourage a situation where the threat is internal, not external. Mass migration is one way to undermine the regime from within. It has been successful in the past in similar circumstances. |
Well, as UR points out, China for one would NOT voluntarily agree to such a plan.
The problem, as I see it, is with Kim Jong-Il himself. Apparently he is content with ruling a medieval fiefdom that will eventually implode into his face, because he is too scared to save his own ass with reforms (as his large neighbour to the north has demonstrated). In fact, I think this is a problem endemic to all hereditory monarchies - the heirs grow up in a high-place and intensely paranoid of falling from it.
What North Korea needs the most is a leader-change - one that looks like an innocent succession of power. But is there any way to instigate this without creating mayhem in North Korea immediately?
Last edited by ranskaldan on 29-01-2003 at 10:41
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
most likely the military or the other party leaders get 60 virgins in this life, so they are somewhat not interested in change
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|