 |
...
This poll is closed. |
| Hercules |
   |
12 |
75.00% |
| Write-in |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Abstain |
   |
4 |
25.00% |
| Total: |
16 voters |
100% |
|
| |
|
|
Cedayon
|
|
You've got my vote, Herc, but I would like to hear your plans and timetable for dealing with the hive.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hercules
|
 |
in Tir Na Og
Sep 2002
time: 05:25
|
|
I turn my back for a minute!
quote:
If we have to go to war, then I definiatly don't want a
negative police, because of our units being out of base squares. |
exactly.
It is the Dir of Peacekeeping Operations job to carry out the will of the people. As I understand it, that will is first and foremost to safe guard our territory.
The second aim is to build a force of occupation to reign in Yang's expansionist ideas and third, to liberate Hive citizens.
and finally if Yang has not surrendered unconditionally to the Peacekeepers after severe setbacks to his force, to seek his distruction.
I think our covert operation troops have done us proud and have gained us several years catch up.
It costs time a money building and training a military force. I know when those boys and girls are sent overseas, they don't want to hear news of disquiet back home. Severe discontent adds fuel to Yang's propoganda machine.
Most of our defensive build up will be on the Easterns side (and the acquistion of AAA is a great help,) but we will not neglect the western shores.
Some of our military capability will of necessity have the best strike offensive available (counter attack and strike where necessary) and our scientists, I know are working feverishly in that area.
I know our citizens are anxious to' liberate' the ordinary people in Hive territory but our strength is vigilence, precision and patience.
It is not for the Dir of Peacekeeping Operations to move our faction to a 'higher' war footing but I would hope to have the quiet and non alarmist cooperation of the CommissHioner, Alpha talent , Directors and Governors in the development, design and production of military units. Ideas welcome.
I realise that one or two needlejets is one less hospital or other social facility, but view it as a slight delay in the delivery of those important citizen facilities, we we all wish to see. Hell I as much as anybody want to enjoy the delights of those offshore R&R facilities.
Also our director of Foreign Affairs will be working his ass off in the UN trying to secure peace across the planet.
Yang might deliver to the UN his weapons of mass distruction ,so continuation of the conflict is not inevitable
If it comes to a sharp increase in hostilities against Yang, I hope on behalf of the Peacekeepers we will have the full backing of all citizens.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GeneralTacticus
|
 |
of Melbourne, Australia
Dec 2001
time: 15:25
|
|
quote:
I realise that one or two needlejets is one less hospital or other social facility, but view it as a slight delay in the delivery of those important citizen facilities, we we all wish to see. Hell I as much as anybody want to enjoy the delights of those offshore R&R facilities. |
Well, no, not really, in view of the low cost of needlejets relative to the facilities you've mentioned. 3-4 needlejets is 1 less RH or TF, but it constitutes quite a powerful military force in it's own right. A fair trade-off, I'd say, as long as we actually have a use for them.
Last edited by GeneralTacticus on 30-01-2003 at 11:56
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25.
Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
28-01-2003 12:46
)
... well, unless you resolve it diplomatically, but that's no fun 
... if Yang were to go down that path, however, I would become more serious.
|