 |
|  |
 |
|
Locutus
|
|
ACS CTP1/2 Manager & Civ4 Co-Manager
|
 |
Hengelo, The Netherlands
Nov 1999 time: 06:25
|
|
We just discovered the Germans so it's time to discuss what our diplomatic policies should be. A number of questions arise:
1) After the non-tresspassing treaties were signed, we pretty much ignored the Austrians, in preparation for war. Do we wish to change this policy now that we've contacted the Germans?
So far the Germans refused to exchange maps, even after threatening them. But it's not unusual for civs to be very reluctant towards signing any treaties on the first turn, if you walk onto one of their cities. If we agree to withdraw and possibly give some gold, they may very well be more receptive in the next turn or the turns after that.
2) How far should we go in giving them gifts? Should we offer to withdraw? Should we give gold (and how much?)
3) What kind of relationship do we want with these 2 civs? War, peace, non-tresspassing, neutral? It doesn't seem wise to go to war with both of them but most of us seem to agree (at least until this point) that war was necessary for successful expansion. So who's gonna be our first victim, if anyone?
Please post your ideas...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mapfi
|
|
Zurich, Switzerland
Jul 2002 time: 06:25
|
|
Well, my opinion is known... If I was playing this alone I would try to get a peace treaty and maybe even more with both of them and expand south. Since I'm not and have to go along with the warmongering here:
I'd say if we have to go to war then we should choose one civ to battle while trying to get the other one as close to us as possible. Give them gifts, maps, whatever they need (except cities of course) and try getting a military agreement. If we had a peace treaty with the Austrians now this road of action would be quite easy now. Since we don't we can still choose between the two civs but there's also the risk both of them decide to annihilate us. As for chances - I'd say either Germany or Austria is similarly likely to accept so decide on the personality. That's not my field of expertise though - someone knowing all the strategy files will have to tell us.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maquiladora
|
|
Germany are stronger, and what looks like, on much faster terrain, so pummel the Austrians first. Keep the Germans happy while we're dealing with the Austrians.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Turambar
|
|
England
Apr 2002 time: 05:25
|
|
Austria have to go first. It'll be quicker and easier to invade them first because of the two rivers leading from us to them.
Be friendly with the Germnas then. Keep them off our backs! And get their map!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
"Our words are backed by slighty pointy sticks"
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zaphod Beeblebrox
|
|
aachen, germany
Aug 1999 time: 05:25
|
|
make the germans friends if possible, money should only spent initially a little to make them like us, everything else (except cities of course) can be given freely, we don't need to move through their terrain, if we don't want to battle them. and though i'm strongly opposing any attack on austria at the moment, i have to agree, they would be the not as impossible prey (easy would be the wrong word here).
but our main strategy should be to expand east/south while maintaining strong forces on the border/s.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Well... I think they are *more of a concern* that the austrians... they're stronger and we have a worse relationship... not that Austrians are big friends... but...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maquiladora
|
|
We've pretty much decided to go to war with the Austrians first because theyre weaker, so i would say theyre still our main concern. Assimilate the weak to conquer the strong... i just made that up.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|